FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2067659972> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2067659972 endingPage "392" @default.
• W2067659972 startingPage "377" @default.
• W2067659972 abstract "The ability of scientists to apply cloning technology to humans has provoked public discussion and media coverage. The present paper reports on a series of studies examining public attitudes to human cloning in the UK, bringing together a range of quantitative and qualitative methods to address this question. These included a nationally representative survey, an experimental vignette study, focus groups and analyses of media coverage. Overall the research presents a complex picture of attitude to and constructions of human cloning. In all of the analyses, therapeutic cloning was viewed more favourably than reproductive cloning. However, while participants in the focus groups were generally negative about both forms of cloning, and this was also reflected in the media analyses, quantitative results showed more positive responses. In the quantitative research, therapeutic cloning was generally accepted when the benefits of such procedures were clear, and although reproductive cloning was less accepted there was still substantial support. Participants in the focus groups only differentiated between therapeutic and reproductive cloning after the issue of therapeutic cloning was explicitly raised; initially they saw cloning as being reproductive cloning and saw no real benefits. Attitudes were shown to be associated with underlying values associated with scientific progress rather than with age, gender or education, and although there were a few differences in the quantitative data based on religious affiliation, these tended to be small effects. Likewise in the focus groups there was little direct appeal to religion, but the main themes were ‘interfering with nature’ and the ‘status of the embryo’, with the latter being used more effectively to try to close down further discussion. In general there was a close correspondence between the media analysis and focus group responses, possibly demonstrating the importance of media as a resource, or that the media reflect public discourse accurately. However, focus group responses did not simply reflect media coverage." @default.
• W2067659972 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2067659972 creator A5019873776 @default.
• W2067659972 creator A5024113165 @default.
• W2067659972 creator A5043632981 @default.
• W2067659972 creator A5050938204 @default.
• W2067659972 creator A5058635459 @default.
• W2067659972 creator A5072200485 @default.
• W2067659972 creator A5083249992 @default.
• W2067659972 date "2007-07-01" @default.
• W2067659972 modified "2023-10-11" @default.
• W2067659972 title "Towards an understanding of British public attitudes concerning human cloning" @default.
• W2067659972 cites W1495387333 @default.
• W2067659972 cites W1606343386 @default.
• W2067659972 cites W1973152032 @default.
• W2067659972 cites W1986609840 @default.
• W2067659972 cites W1992525863 @default.
• W2067659972 cites W2007587803 @default.
• W2067659972 cites W2031898710 @default.
• W2067659972 cites W2056149273 @default.
• W2067659972 cites W2064675346 @default.
• W2067659972 cites W2073738927 @default.
• W2067659972 cites W2076073554 @default.
• W2067659972 cites W2085671762 @default.
• W2067659972 cites W2114406845 @default.
• W2067659972 cites W2117673123 @default.
• W2067659972 cites W2122956520 @default.
• W2067659972 cites W2123551233 @default.
• W2067659972 cites W2137662236 @default.
• W2067659972 cites W2140822213 @default.
• W2067659972 cites W2155143410 @default.
• W2067659972 cites W2156554529 @default.
• W2067659972 cites W2162282962 @default.
• W2067659972 cites W2347065047 @default.
• W2067659972 cites W2001370634 @default.
• W2067659972 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.03.018" @default.
• W2067659972 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17449156" @default.
• W2067659972 hasPublicationYear "2007" @default.
• W2067659972 type Work @default.
• W2067659972 sameAs 2067659972 @default.
• W2067659972 citedByCount "31" @default.
• W2067659972 countsByYear W20676599722012 @default.
• W2067659972 countsByYear W20676599722013 @default.
• W2067659972 countsByYear W20676599722014 @default.
• W2067659972 countsByYear W20676599722015 @default.
• W2067659972 countsByYear W20676599722016 @default.
• W2067659972 countsByYear W20676599722017 @default.
• W2067659972 countsByYear W20676599722018 @default.
• W2067659972 countsByYear W20676599722019 @default.
• W2067659972 countsByYear W20676599722020 @default.
• W2067659972 countsByYear W20676599722021 @default.
• W2067659972 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2067659972 hasAuthorship W2067659972A5019873776 @default.
• W2067659972 hasAuthorship W2067659972A5024113165 @default.
• W2067659972 hasAuthorship W2067659972A5043632981 @default.
• W2067659972 hasAuthorship W2067659972A5050938204 @default.
• W2067659972 hasAuthorship W2067659972A5058635459 @default.
• W2067659972 hasAuthorship W2067659972A5072200485 @default.
• W2067659972 hasAuthorship W2067659972A5083249992 @default.
• W2067659972 hasBestOaLocation W20676599722 @default.
• W2067659972 hasConcept C121050878 @default.
• W2067659972 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W2067659972 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2067659972 hasConcept C175000728 @default.
• W2067659972 hasConcept C19165224 @default.
• W2067659972 hasConcept C199360897 @default.
• W2067659972 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2067659972 hasConcept C54355233 @default.
• W2067659972 hasConcept C56995899 @default.
• W2067659972 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
• W2067659972 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2067659972 hasConcept C9719361 @default.
• W2067659972 hasConceptScore W2067659972C121050878 @default.
• W2067659972 hasConceptScore W2067659972C144024400 @default.
• W2067659972 hasConceptScore W2067659972C15744967 @default.
• W2067659972 hasConceptScore W2067659972C175000728 @default.
• W2067659972 hasConceptScore W2067659972C19165224 @default.
• W2067659972 hasConceptScore W2067659972C199360897 @default.
• W2067659972 hasConceptScore W2067659972C41008148 @default.
• W2067659972 hasConceptScore W2067659972C54355233 @default.
• W2067659972 hasConceptScore W2067659972C56995899 @default.
• W2067659972 hasConceptScore W2067659972C77805123 @default.
• W2067659972 hasConceptScore W2067659972C86803240 @default.
• W2067659972 hasConceptScore W2067659972C9719361 @default.
• W2067659972 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W2067659972 hasLocation W20676599721 @default.
• W2067659972 hasLocation W20676599722 @default.
• W2067659972 hasLocation W20676599723 @default.
• W2067659972 hasLocation W20676599724 @default.
• W2067659972 hasOpenAccess W2067659972 @default.
• W2067659972 hasPrimaryLocation W20676599721 @default.
• W2067659972 hasRelatedWork W1585122714 @default.
• W2067659972 hasRelatedWork W2044609815 @default.
• W2067659972 hasRelatedWork W2088607405 @default.
• W2067659972 hasRelatedWork W2347415770 @default.
• W2067659972 hasRelatedWork W2351350273 @default.
• W2067659972 hasRelatedWork W2361311680 @default.
• W2067659972 hasRelatedWork W2393170429 @default.

• next