FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2067887170> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2067887170 abstract "Forecasting and extracting traffic state likelihood function is a challenging statistical issue in advanced traveler information systems and here new approaches will be explored to determine maximum likelihood of key measurement observed in a traffic sensor network. This problem can be seen as a nonlinear maximum-likelihood or maximum a posteriori (MAP) estimation problems. Practically every urban traveler information or traffic management system is based on traffic collected by point e.g. single or double loop detectors, overhead video cameras [1]. Real-time traffic includes mean speed, traffic density and traffic flow. Traffic management and control with high performance require the estimation/prediction of Maximum Likelihood related to traffic conditions in congestion or accident situations for large spatial and temporal coverage [2]. The traffic condition models are continuously subject to changes over time due to traffic conditions (traffic compositions, incidents …) and environmental factors (dense fog, strong wind, snow …) and missing regarding to problems in distributed sensor network and communication links. Each sensing node in the traffic detector network senses traffic conditions and subsequently, a large number of measurements spatially distributed over traffic network environment will be available. These large streams can not be fully handled at a central processing unit in real time application due to communication links capability and power source limitation. So, as an alternative in distributed strategy, traffic network can be described as a mixture of some elementary geographically distributed conditions. The measurements are thus statistically modeled with a mixture of Gaussians, where each Gaussian component corresponds to one of the elementary conditions. To solve the mentioned distributed maximum likelihood estimator, some distributed methods based on Expectation-Maximization (DEM)-type algorithms have been developed. In the DSN context, [3] has reported an incremental (I-) DEM scheme, while [4] has investigated a Gossip-based (G-) DEM alternative. The first distributed approach will be used here is fully DEM algorithms which can be viewed as an application and adaptation of the incremental EM algorithm [5]. The distributed EM algorithm used here aims to reduce the number of iterations and, hence, the number of communications required. The incremental EM algorithm was shown to converge to a fixed point in [5], and more recently, it was shown that the incremental EM algorithm and the standard EM algorithm have the same fixed points [6]. The second distributed approach, is termed consensus based (CB-) DEM algorithm which implemented for nonlinear ML or MAP parameter estimation based on collected across spatially distributed traffic sensors. The E-step in CBDEM relies on local (per sensor) information. The key difference lies in re-formulating the M-step, where the average log-likelihood of EM's complete data is maximized. CB-DEM lends itself naturally to a general distributed clustering scheme where class-conditional pdfs are even allowed to be non-Gaussian. In addition, CB-DEM relies on bridge sensors offering a more desirable tradeoff between robustness and overhead. The paper is organized as follows. In Section two, we explain how the EM algorithm can be implemented over distributed sensor networks and the general formulations are defined. The decentralized EM is outlined leading to the development of the CB-DEM algorithm are given in Section three. Section four presents the particle filter using the distributed EM algorithm. Section five reviews the case study and simulation results for implementation of standard and fully distributed EM algorithm, Consensus-Based DEM and Particle Filter algorithm based on DEM for mixture density estimation." @default.
• W2067887170 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2067887170 creator A5054668194 @default.
• W2067887170 creator A5073252452 @default.
• W2067887170 date "2011-10-01" @default.
• W2067887170 modified "2023-09-25" @default.
• W2067887170 title "The traffic condition likelihood extraction using incomplete observation in distributed traffic loop detectors" @default.
• W2067887170 cites W1498395183 @default.
• W2067887170 cites W2015245929 @default.
• W2067887170 cites W2099175737 @default.
• W2067887170 cites W2107396783 @default.
• W2067887170 cites W2108970807 @default.
• W2067887170 cites W2158307424 @default.
• W2067887170 cites W2567948266 @default.
• W2067887170 cites W33652460 @default.
• W2067887170 doi "https://doi.org/10.1109/itsc.2011.6082919" @default.
• W2067887170 hasPublicationYear "2011" @default.
• W2067887170 type Work @default.
• W2067887170 sameAs 2067887170 @default.
• W2067887170 citedByCount "1" @default.
• W2067887170 countsByYear W20678871702021 @default.
• W2067887170 crossrefType "proceedings-article" @default.
• W2067887170 hasAuthorship W2067887170A5054668194 @default.
• W2067887170 hasAuthorship W2067887170A5073252452 @default.
• W2067887170 hasConcept C124101348 @default.
• W2067887170 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W2067887170 hasConcept C176715033 @default.
• W2067887170 hasConcept C207512268 @default.
• W2067887170 hasConcept C22212356 @default.
• W2067887170 hasConcept C24590314 @default.
• W2067887170 hasConcept C2779888511 @default.
• W2067887170 hasConcept C31258907 @default.
• W2067887170 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2067887170 hasConcept C64093975 @default.
• W2067887170 hasConcept C76155785 @default.
• W2067887170 hasConcept C79403827 @default.
• W2067887170 hasConcept C94915269 @default.
• W2067887170 hasConceptScore W2067887170C124101348 @default.
• W2067887170 hasConceptScore W2067887170C127413603 @default.
• W2067887170 hasConceptScore W2067887170C176715033 @default.
• W2067887170 hasConceptScore W2067887170C207512268 @default.
• W2067887170 hasConceptScore W2067887170C22212356 @default.
• W2067887170 hasConceptScore W2067887170C24590314 @default.
• W2067887170 hasConceptScore W2067887170C2779888511 @default.
• W2067887170 hasConceptScore W2067887170C31258907 @default.
• W2067887170 hasConceptScore W2067887170C41008148 @default.
• W2067887170 hasConceptScore W2067887170C64093975 @default.
• W2067887170 hasConceptScore W2067887170C76155785 @default.
• W2067887170 hasConceptScore W2067887170C79403827 @default.
• W2067887170 hasConceptScore W2067887170C94915269 @default.
• W2067887170 hasLocation W20678871701 @default.
• W2067887170 hasOpenAccess W2067887170 @default.
• W2067887170 hasPrimaryLocation W20678871701 @default.
• W2067887170 hasRelatedWork W1518198909 @default.
• W2067887170 hasRelatedWork W1527895743 @default.
• W2067887170 hasRelatedWork W1967957780 @default.
• W2067887170 hasRelatedWork W1979681712 @default.
• W2067887170 hasRelatedWork W2011083272 @default.
• W2067887170 hasRelatedWork W2015621239 @default.
• W2067887170 hasRelatedWork W2021780229 @default.
• W2067887170 hasRelatedWork W2045487859 @default.
• W2067887170 hasRelatedWork W2051640542 @default.
• W2067887170 hasRelatedWork W2120552701 @default.
• W2067887170 hasRelatedWork W2141993802 @default.
• W2067887170 hasRelatedWork W2145438115 @default.
• W2067887170 hasRelatedWork W2376185634 @default.
• W2067887170 hasRelatedWork W2381043057 @default.
• W2067887170 hasRelatedWork W2947120254 @default.
• W2067887170 hasRelatedWork W3022690034 @default.
• W2067887170 hasRelatedWork W611705921 @default.
• W2067887170 hasRelatedWork W2861257187 @default.
• W2067887170 hasRelatedWork W3108717718 @default.
• W2067887170 hasRelatedWork W3131211774 @default.
• W2067887170 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2067887170 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2067887170 magId "2067887170" @default.
• W2067887170 workType "article" @default.