FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2068115988> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2068115988 endingPage "375" @default.
• W2068115988 startingPage "361" @default.
• W2068115988 abstract "Click to increase image sizeClick to decrease image size Acknowledgements We would like to thank Brian Garvey for useful comments and Jon Wetlesen for many valuable discussions of the question of moral status over the years. Thanks also go to the participants at the conference Confronting environmental values, Oslo, June 2010 for helpful comments on an earlier draft of this paper. Notes 1. For an interesting discussion of uni-criterial and multi-criterial approaches see Warren (1997 Warren, Mary Anne. 1997. Moral status. Obligations to person and other living things, Oxford: Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar]). 2. It should be pointed out that Warren (1997 Warren, Mary Anne. 1997. Moral status. Obligations to person and other living things, Oxford: Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar]) also defends a grading of moral status. However, her position differs from Wetlesen's in several respects. 3. However, sometimes it is difficult to know when their criticism is directed at ethical theories (or mainstream environmental ethics that is based on such theories) in general,, and when it is directed at standard approaches to the question of moral status in particular (see, O’Neill et al. 2008 O’Neill, John, Holland, Alan and Light, Andrew. 2008. Environmental values, London: Routledge. [Crossref] , [Google Scholar], chap. 6, 7). 4. Another important aspect of O’Neill, Holland and Light's approach is related to our own flourishing and the flourishing of other living things (see, O’Neill et al., 2008 O’Neill, John, Holland, Alan and Light, Andrew. 2008. Environmental values, London: Routledge. [Crossref] , [Google Scholar], pp. 120–121). We will discuss this aspect of O’Neill, Holland and Light's approach in more detail in section 4. 5. We explicitly say ‘a kind of virtue ethics’ because we are not sure whether O’Neill, Holland and Light would endorse a virtue ethical theory as such. Their criticism of ethical theories in chapter 5 suggests that they would be skeptical of endorsing virtue ethics or any other ethical theory which presupposes ‘ethical primitives’. Nevertheless, their proposed alternative approach does make explicit use of virtue and vice terminology, and focuses on human flourishing. Against this background, we find it reasonable to characterise their position as a kind of virtue ethics or a virtue ethics approach. 6. For a more detailed account of environmental virtue ethics, see Sandler and Cafaro (2005 Sandler, Ronald. D., & Cafaro, Philip (Eds). (2005) Environmental virtue ethics (Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Press) [Google Scholar])." @default.
• W2068115988 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2068115988 creator A5064208090 @default.
• W2068115988 creator A5070212672 @default.
• W2068115988 date "2011-10-01" @default.
• W2068115988 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
• W2068115988 title "Reconsidering Approaches to Moral Status" @default.
• W2068115988 cites W1533532177 @default.
• W2068115988 cites W2017452564 @default.
• W2068115988 cites W2046634942 @default.
• W2068115988 cites W2084032075 @default.
• W2068115988 cites W4240446822 @default.
• W2068115988 doi "https://doi.org/10.1080/21550085.2011.605865" @default.
• W2068115988 hasPublicationYear "2011" @default.
• W2068115988 type Work @default.
• W2068115988 sameAs 2068115988 @default.
• W2068115988 citedByCount "1" @default.
• W2068115988 countsByYear W20681159882017 @default.
• W2068115988 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2068115988 hasAuthorship W2068115988A5064208090 @default.
• W2068115988 hasAuthorship W2068115988A5070212672 @default.
• W2068115988 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
• W2068115988 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W2068115988 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W2068115988 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2068115988 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2068115988 hasConcept C198626708 @default.
• W2068115988 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2068115988 hasConcept C27206212 @default.
• W2068115988 hasConcept C2777617010 @default.
• W2068115988 hasConcept C2781017355 @default.
• W2068115988 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
• W2068115988 hasConcept C7991579 @default.
• W2068115988 hasConceptScore W2068115988C111472728 @default.
• W2068115988 hasConceptScore W2068115988C138885662 @default.
• W2068115988 hasConceptScore W2068115988C144024400 @default.
• W2068115988 hasConceptScore W2068115988C15744967 @default.
• W2068115988 hasConceptScore W2068115988C17744445 @default.
• W2068115988 hasConceptScore W2068115988C198626708 @default.
• W2068115988 hasConceptScore W2068115988C199539241 @default.
• W2068115988 hasConceptScore W2068115988C27206212 @default.
• W2068115988 hasConceptScore W2068115988C2777617010 @default.
• W2068115988 hasConceptScore W2068115988C2781017355 @default.
• W2068115988 hasConceptScore W2068115988C77805123 @default.
• W2068115988 hasConceptScore W2068115988C7991579 @default.
• W2068115988 hasIssue "3" @default.
• W2068115988 hasLocation W20681159881 @default.
• W2068115988 hasOpenAccess W2068115988 @default.
• W2068115988 hasPrimaryLocation W20681159881 @default.
• W2068115988 hasRelatedWork W127322547 @default.
• W2068115988 hasRelatedWork W2163335740 @default.
• W2068115988 hasRelatedWork W2348747824 @default.
• W2068115988 hasRelatedWork W2350187356 @default.
• W2068115988 hasRelatedWork W2363845378 @default.
• W2068115988 hasRelatedWork W2368456520 @default.
• W2068115988 hasRelatedWork W2390365288 @default.
• W2068115988 hasRelatedWork W2560435894 @default.
• W2068115988 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
• W2068115988 hasRelatedWork W2898208274 @default.
• W2068115988 hasVolume "14" @default.
• W2068115988 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2068115988 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2068115988 magId "2068115988" @default.
• W2068115988 workType "article" @default.