FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2068236532> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2068236532 endingPage "e34" @default.
• W2068236532 startingPage "e34" @default.
• W2068236532 abstract "ObjectiveTo explore disparities in counseling of adult female cancer patients for fertility preservation.DesignRetrospective study of female patients with a diagnosis of breast, gynecologic, or hematologic cancer from 2009-2013 at an academic medical center.Materials and MethodsElectronic medical record data for demographics, counseling for fertility preservation, and cancer diagnosis and treatment was obtained for 587 female patients with breast, gynecologic, or hematologic cancer. Retrospective analysis of 353 patients (19-42y; x- = 35.0, SD = 5.31) with available chemotherapeutic treatment data was performed.Results262/353 (74%) women were exposed to a gonadotoxic chemotherapeutic agent; 181 women were diagnosed with breast cancer, 53 with a hematologic (i.e., leukemia/lymphoma) cancer, and 28 with a gynecologic cancer. 161/262 (62%) chemotherapy exposed women had documented counseling for fertility preservation; 77 (29%) women were not counseled, and counseling was not documented in 24 (9%) charts. Younger women were more likely to be counseled than older women; the average age of those counseled was (x- =34.0, SD =5.6yrs), not counseled (x- = 35.0, SD =4.7yrs), and not appropriate for counseling (x- =35.5, SD =4.4 yrs) (p <. 05). Racial differences in counseling were also found (p <. 05) with 86% of Hispanic women, 65% of Asian women, 62% of white women, and 53% of black women with documented counseling. Divorced women were less likely to be counseled than women of any other marital status (p <. 05). Women with gynecological or hematological cancer or who had a lower cancer stage were more likely to be counseled that those with other cancers or higher stages (p <. 05). Logistic regression resulted in no unique variance contribution in a model including age, marital status, race, cancer diagnosis, and stage.ConclusionIn the current study, demographic and diagnostic disparities were evident in the counseling of cancer patients for fertility preservation. Patients who are not offered fertility preservation prior to cancer treatment have previously been found to experience significant regret and poorer quality of life. In addition to emotional harm, disparate counseling for fertility preservation could result in an unnecessary decreased ability for some women to fulfill their future reproductive desires. Equality in the counseling of female cancer patients for fertility preservation is imperative in order to reduce the risk of emotional harm and future infertility. ObjectiveTo explore disparities in counseling of adult female cancer patients for fertility preservation. To explore disparities in counseling of adult female cancer patients for fertility preservation. DesignRetrospective study of female patients with a diagnosis of breast, gynecologic, or hematologic cancer from 2009-2013 at an academic medical center. Retrospective study of female patients with a diagnosis of breast, gynecologic, or hematologic cancer from 2009-2013 at an academic medical center. Materials and MethodsElectronic medical record data for demographics, counseling for fertility preservation, and cancer diagnosis and treatment was obtained for 587 female patients with breast, gynecologic, or hematologic cancer. Retrospective analysis of 353 patients (19-42y; x- = 35.0, SD = 5.31) with available chemotherapeutic treatment data was performed. Electronic medical record data for demographics, counseling for fertility preservation, and cancer diagnosis and treatment was obtained for 587 female patients with breast, gynecologic, or hematologic cancer. Retrospective analysis of 353 patients (19-42y; x- = 35.0, SD = 5.31) with available chemotherapeutic treatment data was performed. Results262/353 (74%) women were exposed to a gonadotoxic chemotherapeutic agent; 181 women were diagnosed with breast cancer, 53 with a hematologic (i.e., leukemia/lymphoma) cancer, and 28 with a gynecologic cancer. 161/262 (62%) chemotherapy exposed women had documented counseling for fertility preservation; 77 (29%) women were not counseled, and counseling was not documented in 24 (9%) charts. Younger women were more likely to be counseled than older women; the average age of those counseled was (x- =34.0, SD =5.6yrs), not counseled (x- = 35.0, SD =4.7yrs), and not appropriate for counseling (x- =35.5, SD =4.4 yrs) (p <. 05). Racial differences in counseling were also found (p <. 05) with 86% of Hispanic women, 65% of Asian women, 62% of white women, and 53% of black women with documented counseling. Divorced women were less likely to be counseled than women of any other marital status (p <. 05). Women with gynecological or hematological cancer or who had a lower cancer stage were more likely to be counseled that those with other cancers or higher stages (p <. 05). Logistic regression resulted in no unique variance contribution in a model including age, marital status, race, cancer diagnosis, and stage. 262/353 (74%) women were exposed to a gonadotoxic chemotherapeutic agent; 181 women were diagnosed with breast cancer, 53 with a hematologic (i.e., leukemia/lymphoma) cancer, and 28 with a gynecologic cancer. 161/262 (62%) chemotherapy exposed women had documented counseling for fertility preservation; 77 (29%) women were not counseled, and counseling was not documented in 24 (9%) charts. Younger women were more likely to be counseled than older women; the average age of those counseled was (x- =34.0, SD =5.6yrs), not counseled (x- = 35.0, SD =4.7yrs), and not appropriate for counseling (x- =35.5, SD =4.4 yrs) (p <. 05). Racial differences in counseling were also found (p <. 05) with 86% of Hispanic women, 65% of Asian women, 62% of white women, and 53% of black women with documented counseling. Divorced women were less likely to be counseled than women of any other marital status (p <. 05). Women with gynecological or hematological cancer or who had a lower cancer stage were more likely to be counseled that those with other cancers or higher stages (p <. 05). Logistic regression resulted in no unique variance contribution in a model including age, marital status, race, cancer diagnosis, and stage. ConclusionIn the current study, demographic and diagnostic disparities were evident in the counseling of cancer patients for fertility preservation. Patients who are not offered fertility preservation prior to cancer treatment have previously been found to experience significant regret and poorer quality of life. In addition to emotional harm, disparate counseling for fertility preservation could result in an unnecessary decreased ability for some women to fulfill their future reproductive desires. Equality in the counseling of female cancer patients for fertility preservation is imperative in order to reduce the risk of emotional harm and future infertility. In the current study, demographic and diagnostic disparities were evident in the counseling of cancer patients for fertility preservation. Patients who are not offered fertility preservation prior to cancer treatment have previously been found to experience significant regret and poorer quality of life. In addition to emotional harm, disparate counseling for fertility preservation could result in an unnecessary decreased ability for some women to fulfill their future reproductive desires. Equality in the counseling of female cancer patients for fertility preservation is imperative in order to reduce the risk of emotional harm and future infertility." @default.
• W2068236532 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2068236532 creator A5005307171 @default.
• W2068236532 creator A5023340631 @default.
• W2068236532 creator A5030152195 @default.
• W2068236532 creator A5064972346 @default.
• W2068236532 creator A5069299895 @default.
• W2068236532 creator A5080372423 @default.
• W2068236532 date "2014-09-01" @default.
• W2068236532 modified "2023-09-30" @default.
• W2068236532 title "Disparities in counseling female cancer patients for fertility preservation: adding insult to injury?" @default.
• W2068236532 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.07.124" @default.
• W2068236532 hasPublicationYear "2014" @default.
• W2068236532 type Work @default.
• W2068236532 sameAs 2068236532 @default.
• W2068236532 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2068236532 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2068236532 hasAuthorship W2068236532A5005307171 @default.
• W2068236532 hasAuthorship W2068236532A5023340631 @default.
• W2068236532 hasAuthorship W2068236532A5030152195 @default.
• W2068236532 hasAuthorship W2068236532A5064972346 @default.
• W2068236532 hasAuthorship W2068236532A5069299895 @default.
• W2068236532 hasAuthorship W2068236532A5080372423 @default.
• W2068236532 hasBestOaLocation W20682365321 @default.
• W2068236532 hasConcept C131872663 @default.
• W2068236532 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2068236532 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2068236532 hasConcept C2777904497 @default.
• W2068236532 hasConcept C2780358164 @default.
• W2068236532 hasConcept C2908647359 @default.
• W2068236532 hasConcept C518429986 @default.
• W2068236532 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2068236532 hasConcept C99454951 @default.
• W2068236532 hasConceptScore W2068236532C131872663 @default.
• W2068236532 hasConceptScore W2068236532C17744445 @default.
• W2068236532 hasConceptScore W2068236532C199539241 @default.
• W2068236532 hasConceptScore W2068236532C2777904497 @default.
• W2068236532 hasConceptScore W2068236532C2780358164 @default.
• W2068236532 hasConceptScore W2068236532C2908647359 @default.
• W2068236532 hasConceptScore W2068236532C518429986 @default.
• W2068236532 hasConceptScore W2068236532C71924100 @default.
• W2068236532 hasConceptScore W2068236532C99454951 @default.
• W2068236532 hasIssue "3" @default.
• W2068236532 hasLocation W20682365321 @default.
• W2068236532 hasOpenAccess W2068236532 @default.
• W2068236532 hasPrimaryLocation W20682365321 @default.
• W2068236532 hasRelatedWork W2075047034 @default.
• W2068236532 hasRelatedWork W2112037607 @default.
• W2068236532 hasRelatedWork W2321844316 @default.
• W2068236532 hasRelatedWork W2947048987 @default.
• W2068236532 hasRelatedWork W2955048361 @default.
• W2068236532 hasRelatedWork W3022733196 @default.
• W2068236532 hasRelatedWork W3026972092 @default.
• W2068236532 hasRelatedWork W3118901434 @default.
• W2068236532 hasRelatedWork W3164078055 @default.
• W2068236532 hasRelatedWork W4287189765 @default.
• W2068236532 hasVolume "102" @default.
• W2068236532 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2068236532 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2068236532 magId "2068236532" @default.
• W2068236532 workType "article" @default.