FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2068249095> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2068249095 endingPage "531" @default.
• W2068249095 startingPage "527" @default.
• W2068249095 abstract "BackgroundMultiple valve sugery was performed utilizing beating heart technique through simultaneous antegrade/retrograde perfusion with blood. We herein report our experience with this technique in patients with multiple valve disease processes.MethodsOf 520 consecutive patients operated upon utilizing this method between 2000 and 2007, 59 patients underwent multiple valve surgery. Mean age was 54.2 ± 13.8 years (range, 21 to 83) with 41 males (69.5%) and 18 females (30.5%). Double-valve and triple-valve operations were performed in 54 and 5 patients, respectively.ResultsOf 32 mitral valve replacements, there were 30 biological (93.8%) and 2 mechanical (6.2%) mitral valves. Aortic valve replacement was performed in 25 patients: 22 (88%) with biological and 3 (12%) with mechanical prostheses. Two patients had mitral and tricuspid valve repair. The most common procedure was mitral valve replacement plus tricuspid valve repair (16 patients; 27.1%), mitral valve replacement plus aortic replacement (14 patients; 23.7%), and mitral valve repair plus tricuspid repair (13 patients; 22%). Concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting was performed in 7 (11.8%) of 59 patients. Mean hospital stay was 25.6 ± 29.6 days (range, 3 to 195; median, 17). Early mortality (less than 30 days) occurred in 5 patients (8.4%), and late mortality (more than 30 days) occurred in 2 patients (3.4%). Reoperation for bleeding was needed in 5 patients (8.4%). Intra-aortic balloon pump was required preoperatively and postoperatively in 4 and 1 patients, respectively. Clinical and echocardiographic follow-up in 33 patients at 11.8 ± 16.4 months (range, 1 to 80) showed preserved postoperative left ventricular ejection fraction. Three patients had perivalvular leaks on follow-up but required no surgery. Nineteen patients were lost to follow-up.ConclusionsThis study demonstrates the feasibility and safety of beating heart techniques in multiple valve operations. Further studies are needed to fully evaluate the potential benefits of this method of myocardial perfusion as a means to eliminate ischemia-reperfusion injury, and to preserve ventricular function in multiple valvular surgery. Multiple valve sugery was performed utilizing beating heart technique through simultaneous antegrade/retrograde perfusion with blood. We herein report our experience with this technique in patients with multiple valve disease processes. Of 520 consecutive patients operated upon utilizing this method between 2000 and 2007, 59 patients underwent multiple valve surgery. Mean age was 54.2 ± 13.8 years (range, 21 to 83) with 41 males (69.5%) and 18 females (30.5%). Double-valve and triple-valve operations were performed in 54 and 5 patients, respectively. Of 32 mitral valve replacements, there were 30 biological (93.8%) and 2 mechanical (6.2%) mitral valves. Aortic valve replacement was performed in 25 patients: 22 (88%) with biological and 3 (12%) with mechanical prostheses. Two patients had mitral and tricuspid valve repair. The most common procedure was mitral valve replacement plus tricuspid valve repair (16 patients; 27.1%), mitral valve replacement plus aortic replacement (14 patients; 23.7%), and mitral valve repair plus tricuspid repair (13 patients; 22%). Concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting was performed in 7 (11.8%) of 59 patients. Mean hospital stay was 25.6 ± 29.6 days (range, 3 to 195; median, 17). Early mortality (less than 30 days) occurred in 5 patients (8.4%), and late mortality (more than 30 days) occurred in 2 patients (3.4%). Reoperation for bleeding was needed in 5 patients (8.4%). Intra-aortic balloon pump was required preoperatively and postoperatively in 4 and 1 patients, respectively. Clinical and echocardiographic follow-up in 33 patients at 11.8 ± 16.4 months (range, 1 to 80) showed preserved postoperative left ventricular ejection fraction. Three patients had perivalvular leaks on follow-up but required no surgery. Nineteen patients were lost to follow-up. This study demonstrates the feasibility and safety of beating heart techniques in multiple valve operations. Further studies are needed to fully evaluate the potential benefits of this method of myocardial perfusion as a means to eliminate ischemia-reperfusion injury, and to preserve ventricular function in multiple valvular surgery." @default.
• W2068249095 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2068249095 creator A5007796308 @default.
• W2068249095 creator A5019744156 @default.
• W2068249095 creator A5020277884 @default.
• W2068249095 creator A5040348170 @default.
• W2068249095 creator A5046166607 @default.
• W2068249095 creator A5088429861 @default.
• W2068249095 date "2009-02-01" @default.
• W2068249095 modified "2023-10-17" @default.
• W2068249095 title "Multiple Valve Surgery with Beating Heart Technique" @default.
• W2068249095 cites W1966819829 @default.
• W2068249095 cites W1967005836 @default.
• W2068249095 cites W1981602718 @default.
• W2068249095 cites W1985869946 @default.
• W2068249095 cites W1995144926 @default.
• W2068249095 cites W2020396346 @default.
• W2068249095 cites W2020934774 @default.
• W2068249095 cites W2021191977 @default.
• W2068249095 cites W2055211005 @default.
• W2068249095 cites W2060000513 @default.
• W2068249095 cites W2065405349 @default.
• W2068249095 cites W2071054635 @default.
• W2068249095 cites W2073377374 @default.
• W2068249095 cites W2092102648 @default.
• W2068249095 cites W2102922292 @default.
• W2068249095 cites W2104490745 @default.
• W2068249095 cites W2112373170 @default.
• W2068249095 cites W2112960453 @default.
• W2068249095 cites W2113540924 @default.
• W2068249095 cites W2186776973 @default.
• W2068249095 cites W2328536190 @default.
• W2068249095 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2008.10.030" @default.
• W2068249095 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19161773" @default.
• W2068249095 hasPublicationYear "2009" @default.
• W2068249095 type Work @default.
• W2068249095 sameAs 2068249095 @default.
• W2068249095 citedByCount "34" @default.
• W2068249095 countsByYear W20682490952013 @default.
• W2068249095 countsByYear W20682490952014 @default.
• W2068249095 countsByYear W20682490952015 @default.
• W2068249095 countsByYear W20682490952016 @default.
• W2068249095 countsByYear W20682490952017 @default.
• W2068249095 countsByYear W20682490952018 @default.
• W2068249095 countsByYear W20682490952020 @default.
• W2068249095 countsByYear W20682490952021 @default.
• W2068249095 countsByYear W20682490952022 @default.
• W2068249095 countsByYear W20682490952023 @default.
• W2068249095 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2068249095 hasAuthorship W2068249095A5007796308 @default.
• W2068249095 hasAuthorship W2068249095A5019744156 @default.
• W2068249095 hasAuthorship W2068249095A5020277884 @default.
• W2068249095 hasAuthorship W2068249095A5040348170 @default.
• W2068249095 hasAuthorship W2068249095A5046166607 @default.
• W2068249095 hasAuthorship W2068249095A5088429861 @default.
• W2068249095 hasBestOaLocation W20682490951 @default.
• W2068249095 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2068249095 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2068249095 hasConcept C164705383 @default.
• W2068249095 hasConcept C2775854548 @default.
• W2068249095 hasConcept C2776570981 @default.
• W2068249095 hasConcept C2776820930 @default.
• W2068249095 hasConcept C2777543888 @default.
• W2068249095 hasConcept C2779384505 @default.
• W2068249095 hasConcept C2779946567 @default.
• W2068249095 hasConcept C2780007028 @default.
• W2068249095 hasConcept C2780026749 @default.
• W2068249095 hasConcept C2780679668 @default.
• W2068249095 hasConcept C2780714102 @default.
• W2068249095 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2068249095 hasConceptScore W2068249095C126322002 @default.
• W2068249095 hasConceptScore W2068249095C141071460 @default.
• W2068249095 hasConceptScore W2068249095C164705383 @default.
• W2068249095 hasConceptScore W2068249095C2775854548 @default.
• W2068249095 hasConceptScore W2068249095C2776570981 @default.
• W2068249095 hasConceptScore W2068249095C2776820930 @default.
• W2068249095 hasConceptScore W2068249095C2777543888 @default.
• W2068249095 hasConceptScore W2068249095C2779384505 @default.
• W2068249095 hasConceptScore W2068249095C2779946567 @default.
• W2068249095 hasConceptScore W2068249095C2780007028 @default.
• W2068249095 hasConceptScore W2068249095C2780026749 @default.
• W2068249095 hasConceptScore W2068249095C2780679668 @default.
• W2068249095 hasConceptScore W2068249095C2780714102 @default.
• W2068249095 hasConceptScore W2068249095C71924100 @default.
• W2068249095 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W2068249095 hasLocation W20682490951 @default.
• W2068249095 hasLocation W20682490952 @default.
• W2068249095 hasOpenAccess W2068249095 @default.
• W2068249095 hasPrimaryLocation W20682490951 @default.
• W2068249095 hasRelatedWork W2055633558 @default.
• W2068249095 hasRelatedWork W2071054635 @default.
• W2068249095 hasRelatedWork W2076025268 @default.
• W2068249095 hasRelatedWork W2104490745 @default.
• W2068249095 hasRelatedWork W2115873645 @default.
• W2068249095 hasRelatedWork W2120601508 @default.
• W2068249095 hasRelatedWork W2331507162 @default.
• W2068249095 hasRelatedWork W2345605303 @default.
• W2068249095 hasRelatedWork W3081965096 @default.

• next