FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2068277626> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2068277626 endingPage "21" @default.
• W2068277626 startingPage "18" @default.
• W2068277626 abstract "<h3>Abstract</h3> <b>Objectives:</b> To determine the prevalence of drug and alcohol use among newly remanded prisoners, assess the effectiveness of prison reception screening, and examine the clinical management of substance misusers among remand prisoners. <b>Design:</b> A consecutive case study of remand prisoners screened at reception for substance misuse and treatment needs and comparison of findings with those of prison reception screening and treatment provision. <b>Setting:</b> A large adult male remand prison (Durham). <b>Subjects:</b> 548 men aged 21 and over awaiting trial. <b>Main outcome measures:</b> Prevalence of substance misuse; treatment needs of substance misusers; effectiveness of prison reception screening for substance misuse; provision of detoxification programmes. <b>Results:</b> Before remand 312 (57%) men were using illicit drugs and 181 (33%) met DSM-IV drug misuse or dependence criteria; 177 (32%) men met misuse or dependence criteria for alcohol. 391 (71%) men were judged to require help directed at their drug or alcohol use and 197 (36%) were judged to require a detoxification programme. The prison reception screen identified recent illicit drug use in 131 (24%) of 536 men and problem drinking in 103 (19%). Drug use was more likely to be identified by prison screening if an inmate was using multiple substances, using opiates, or had a diagnosis of abuse or dependence. 47 (9%) of 536 inmates were prescribed treatment to ease the symptoms of substance withdrawal. <b>Conclusions:</b> The prevalence of substance misuse in newly remanded prisoners is high. Prison reception health screening consistently underestimates drug and alcohol use. In many cases in which substance use is identified the quantities and numbers of different substances being used are underestimated. Initial management of inmates identified by prison screening as having problems with dependence producing substances is poor. Few receive a detoxification programme, so that many are left with the option of continuing to use drugs in prison or facing untreated withdrawal. <h3>Key messages</h3> In screening for substance use in remand prisoners a positive finding must be considered the norm rather than the exception Present prison reception procedures fail to identify the extent to which substances are used and misused by people newly remanded to prison Provision of detoxification programmes for prisoners identified by reception screening as having serious drug and alcohol related problems is inadequate Prisoners who need help but think that asking for this is more likely to result in punishment than treatment are not likely be truthful about their substance use More consideration needs to be given to reducing substance misuse in prisons by improving assessment at reception and providing better treatment for misusers rather than using random urine screening to detect and punish offenders" @default.
• W2068277626 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2068277626 creator A5066896390 @default.
• W2068277626 creator A5088854963 @default.
• W2068277626 creator A5091141644 @default.
• W2068277626 date "1997-07-05" @default.
• W2068277626 modified "2023-10-11" @default.
• W2068277626 title "Substance use in remand prisoners: a consecutive case study" @default.
• W2068277626 cites W1782492077 @default.
• W2068277626 cites W1973961869 @default.
• W2068277626 cites W2001987588 @default.
• W2068277626 cites W2005745338 @default.
• W2068277626 cites W2038148795 @default.
• W2068277626 cites W2045296797 @default.
• W2068277626 cites W2091833118 @default.
• W2068277626 cites W2103115040 @default.
• W2068277626 cites W2167563976 @default.
• W2068277626 doi "https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.315.7099.18" @default.
• W2068277626 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/2127032" @default.
• W2068277626 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9233320" @default.
• W2068277626 hasPublicationYear "1997" @default.
• W2068277626 type Work @default.
• W2068277626 sameAs 2068277626 @default.
• W2068277626 citedByCount "69" @default.
• W2068277626 countsByYear W20682776262012 @default.
• W2068277626 countsByYear W20682776262013 @default.
• W2068277626 countsByYear W20682776262014 @default.
• W2068277626 countsByYear W20682776262015 @default.
• W2068277626 countsByYear W20682776262016 @default.
• W2068277626 countsByYear W20682776262017 @default.
• W2068277626 countsByYear W20682776262019 @default.
• W2068277626 countsByYear W20682776262020 @default.
• W2068277626 countsByYear W20682776262021 @default.
• W2068277626 countsByYear W20682776262022 @default.
• W2068277626 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2068277626 hasAuthorship W2068277626A5066896390 @default.
• W2068277626 hasAuthorship W2068277626A5088854963 @default.
• W2068277626 hasAuthorship W2068277626A5091141644 @default.
• W2068277626 hasBestOaLocation W20682776262 @default.
• W2068277626 hasConcept C118552586 @default.
• W2068277626 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2068277626 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2068277626 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2068277626 hasConcept C2778272461 @default.
• W2068277626 hasConcept C2780035454 @default.
• W2068277626 hasConcept C2780656516 @default.
• W2068277626 hasConcept C40010229 @default.
• W2068277626 hasConcept C66487177 @default.
• W2068277626 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2068277626 hasConcept C73484699 @default.
• W2068277626 hasConceptScore W2068277626C118552586 @default.
• W2068277626 hasConceptScore W2068277626C15744967 @default.
• W2068277626 hasConceptScore W2068277626C17744445 @default.
• W2068277626 hasConceptScore W2068277626C199539241 @default.
• W2068277626 hasConceptScore W2068277626C2778272461 @default.
• W2068277626 hasConceptScore W2068277626C2780035454 @default.
• W2068277626 hasConceptScore W2068277626C2780656516 @default.
• W2068277626 hasConceptScore W2068277626C40010229 @default.
• W2068277626 hasConceptScore W2068277626C66487177 @default.
• W2068277626 hasConceptScore W2068277626C71924100 @default.
• W2068277626 hasConceptScore W2068277626C73484699 @default.
• W2068277626 hasIssue "7099" @default.
• W2068277626 hasLocation W20682776261 @default.
• W2068277626 hasLocation W20682776262 @default.
• W2068277626 hasLocation W20682776263 @default.
• W2068277626 hasLocation W20682776264 @default.
• W2068277626 hasOpenAccess W2068277626 @default.
• W2068277626 hasPrimaryLocation W20682776261 @default.
• W2068277626 hasRelatedWork W2005941994 @default.
• W2068277626 hasRelatedWork W2026415849 @default.
• W2068277626 hasRelatedWork W2035629245 @default.
• W2068277626 hasRelatedWork W203634985 @default.
• W2068277626 hasRelatedWork W2075728214 @default.
• W2068277626 hasRelatedWork W2113932314 @default.
• W2068277626 hasRelatedWork W2119633315 @default.
• W2068277626 hasRelatedWork W2122904425 @default.
• W2068277626 hasRelatedWork W605879653 @default.
• W2068277626 hasRelatedWork W98548644 @default.
• W2068277626 hasVolume "315" @default.
• W2068277626 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2068277626 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2068277626 magId "2068277626" @default.
• W2068277626 workType "article" @default.