Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2068278069> ?p ?o ?g. }
- W2068278069 endingPage "1082" @default.
- W2068278069 startingPage "1075" @default.
- W2068278069 abstract "Purpose To determine the differences in the visual results, pain response, biomechanical effect, quality of vision, and higher-order aberrations, among other parameters, in eyes undergoing either photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) or thin-flap LASIK/sub-Bowman keratomileusis (SBK; intended flap thickness of ±100 μm and 8.5-mm diameter) at 1, 3, and 6 months after surgery. Design A contralateral eye pilot study. Participants Fifty patients (100 eyes) were enrolled at 2 sites. Methods The mean preoperative spherical refraction was –3.66 diopters (D) and the mean cylinder was –0.66 D for all eyes. Eyes in the PRK group underwent 8.5-mm ethanol-assisted PRK, whereas in eyes in the SBK group, an 8.5-mm, (intended) 100-μm flap was created with a 60-kHz IntraLase femtosecond laser (Advanced Medical Optics, Santa Ana, CA). All eyes underwent a customized laser ablation using an Alcon LADARVision 4000 CustomCornea excimer laser (Alcon Laboratories, Fort Worth, TX). Main Outcome Measures Preoperative and postoperative tests included best spectacle-corrected visual acuity, uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), corneal topography, wavefront aberrometry, retinal image quality, and contrast sensitivity. Patients completed subjective questionnaires at each visit. Results One- and 3-month UCVA results showed a statistically significant difference: SBK, 88% 20/20 or better vs. 48% 20/20 or better for PRK. At 6 months, UCVA was 94% 20/20 or better for PRK and 92% for SBK. At 1 and 3 months, the SBK group had lower higher-order aberrations (coma and spherical aberration; P≤0.05); at 1, 3, and 6 months, there was no statistically significant difference in spherical aberration and vertical and horizontal coma between the 2 groups. Conclusions At the 1-month follow-up, the thin-flap/SBK group demonstrated clinically and statistically significant better visual acuity than the PRK group. By 3 months, the vision in the 2 groups had begun to equalize, although the SBK eyes continued to have better vision. At 6 months, there were no statistical differences between the 2 groups. Financial Disclosure(s) Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references. To determine the differences in the visual results, pain response, biomechanical effect, quality of vision, and higher-order aberrations, among other parameters, in eyes undergoing either photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) or thin-flap LASIK/sub-Bowman keratomileusis (SBK; intended flap thickness of ±100 μm and 8.5-mm diameter) at 1, 3, and 6 months after surgery. A contralateral eye pilot study. Fifty patients (100 eyes) were enrolled at 2 sites. The mean preoperative spherical refraction was –3.66 diopters (D) and the mean cylinder was –0.66 D for all eyes. Eyes in the PRK group underwent 8.5-mm ethanol-assisted PRK, whereas in eyes in the SBK group, an 8.5-mm, (intended) 100-μm flap was created with a 60-kHz IntraLase femtosecond laser (Advanced Medical Optics, Santa Ana, CA). All eyes underwent a customized laser ablation using an Alcon LADARVision 4000 CustomCornea excimer laser (Alcon Laboratories, Fort Worth, TX). Preoperative and postoperative tests included best spectacle-corrected visual acuity, uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), corneal topography, wavefront aberrometry, retinal image quality, and contrast sensitivity. Patients completed subjective questionnaires at each visit. One- and 3-month UCVA results showed a statistically significant difference: SBK, 88% 20/20 or better vs. 48% 20/20 or better for PRK. At 6 months, UCVA was 94% 20/20 or better for PRK and 92% for SBK. At 1 and 3 months, the SBK group had lower higher-order aberrations (coma and spherical aberration; P≤0.05); at 1, 3, and 6 months, there was no statistically significant difference in spherical aberration and vertical and horizontal coma between the 2 groups. At the 1-month follow-up, the thin-flap/SBK group demonstrated clinically and statistically significant better visual acuity than the PRK group. By 3 months, the vision in the 2 groups had begun to equalize, although the SBK eyes continued to have better vision. At 6 months, there were no statistical differences between the 2 groups." @default.
- W2068278069 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W2068278069 creator A5070881806 @default.
- W2068278069 creator A5073106885 @default.
- W2068278069 creator A5086263110 @default.
- W2068278069 date "2009-06-01" @default.
- W2068278069 modified "2023-10-13" @default.
- W2068278069 title "A Prospective, Contralateral Eye Study Comparing Thin-Flap LASIK (Sub-Bowman Keratomileusis) with Photorefractive Keratectomy" @default.
- W2068278069 cites W119203482 @default.
- W2068278069 cites W134877927 @default.
- W2068278069 cites W141778156 @default.
- W2068278069 cites W1965850243 @default.
- W2068278069 cites W1969453535 @default.
- W2068278069 cites W1972866937 @default.
- W2068278069 cites W2004045193 @default.
- W2068278069 cites W2016013481 @default.
- W2068278069 cites W2016121962 @default.
- W2068278069 cites W2020104503 @default.
- W2068278069 cites W2024136510 @default.
- W2068278069 cites W2041949083 @default.
- W2068278069 cites W2042883488 @default.
- W2068278069 cites W2058262801 @default.
- W2068278069 cites W2059759484 @default.
- W2068278069 cites W2064422455 @default.
- W2068278069 cites W2068642721 @default.
- W2068278069 cites W2069438669 @default.
- W2068278069 cites W2079944557 @default.
- W2068278069 cites W2092968771 @default.
- W2068278069 cites W2097407903 @default.
- W2068278069 cites W2100414062 @default.
- W2068278069 cites W2103255857 @default.
- W2068278069 cites W2112940726 @default.
- W2068278069 cites W2113061969 @default.
- W2068278069 cites W2146837898 @default.
- W2068278069 cites W2166226923 @default.
- W2068278069 cites W2168486848 @default.
- W2068278069 cites W2205178949 @default.
- W2068278069 cites W2245260622 @default.
- W2068278069 cites W2275821613 @default.
- W2068278069 cites W27303644 @default.
- W2068278069 cites W4210957604 @default.
- W2068278069 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2009.01.001" @default.
- W2068278069 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19486798" @default.
- W2068278069 hasPublicationYear "2009" @default.
- W2068278069 type Work @default.
- W2068278069 sameAs 2068278069 @default.
- W2068278069 citedByCount "76" @default.
- W2068278069 countsByYear W20682780692012 @default.
- W2068278069 countsByYear W20682780692013 @default.
- W2068278069 countsByYear W20682780692014 @default.
- W2068278069 countsByYear W20682780692015 @default.
- W2068278069 countsByYear W20682780692016 @default.
- W2068278069 countsByYear W20682780692017 @default.
- W2068278069 countsByYear W20682780692018 @default.
- W2068278069 countsByYear W20682780692019 @default.
- W2068278069 countsByYear W20682780692020 @default.
- W2068278069 countsByYear W20682780692021 @default.
- W2068278069 countsByYear W20682780692022 @default.
- W2068278069 countsByYear W20682780692023 @default.
- W2068278069 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2068278069 hasAuthorship W2068278069A5070881806 @default.
- W2068278069 hasAuthorship W2068278069A5073106885 @default.
- W2068278069 hasAuthorship W2068278069A5086263110 @default.
- W2068278069 hasConcept C100136789 @default.
- W2068278069 hasConcept C118487528 @default.
- W2068278069 hasConcept C119767625 @default.
- W2068278069 hasConcept C120665830 @default.
- W2068278069 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
- W2068278069 hasConcept C15336307 @default.
- W2068278069 hasConcept C165788157 @default.
- W2068278069 hasConcept C259533 @default.
- W2068278069 hasConcept C2776882836 @default.
- W2068278069 hasConcept C2778257484 @default.
- W2068278069 hasConcept C2778609529 @default.
- W2068278069 hasConcept C2780161092 @default.
- W2068278069 hasConcept C2780350528 @default.
- W2068278069 hasConcept C2780603455 @default.
- W2068278069 hasConcept C2780827179 @default.
- W2068278069 hasConcept C2781053140 @default.
- W2068278069 hasConcept C54497739 @default.
- W2068278069 hasConcept C70638346 @default.
- W2068278069 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W2068278069 hasConcept C90171120 @default.
- W2068278069 hasConceptScore W2068278069C100136789 @default.
- W2068278069 hasConceptScore W2068278069C118487528 @default.
- W2068278069 hasConceptScore W2068278069C119767625 @default.
- W2068278069 hasConceptScore W2068278069C120665830 @default.
- W2068278069 hasConceptScore W2068278069C121332964 @default.
- W2068278069 hasConceptScore W2068278069C15336307 @default.
- W2068278069 hasConceptScore W2068278069C165788157 @default.
- W2068278069 hasConceptScore W2068278069C259533 @default.
- W2068278069 hasConceptScore W2068278069C2776882836 @default.
- W2068278069 hasConceptScore W2068278069C2778257484 @default.
- W2068278069 hasConceptScore W2068278069C2778609529 @default.
- W2068278069 hasConceptScore W2068278069C2780161092 @default.
- W2068278069 hasConceptScore W2068278069C2780350528 @default.
- W2068278069 hasConceptScore W2068278069C2780603455 @default.
- W2068278069 hasConceptScore W2068278069C2780827179 @default.