FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2068436203> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2068436203 endingPage "46" @default.
• W2068436203 startingPage "i" @default.
• W2068436203 abstract "Over the last 15 years, many states have implemented high-stakes tests as part of an effort to strengthen accountability for schools, teachers, and students. Predictably, there has been vigorous disagreement regarding the contributions of such policies to increasing test scores and, more importantly, to improving student learning. A recent study by Amrein and Berliner (2002a) has received a great deal of media attention. Employing various databases covering the period 1990–2000, the authors conclude that there is no evidence that states that implemented high-stakes tests demonstrated improved student achievement on various external measures such as performance on the SAT®, ACT, AP®, or NAEP. In a subsequent study in which they conducted a more extensive analysis of state policies (Amrein & Berliner, 2002b), they reach a similar conclusion. However, both their methodology and their findings have been challenged by a number of authors. In this paper, we undertake an extended reanalysis of one component of Amrein and Berliner (2002a). We focus on the performance of states, over the period 1992 to 2000, on the NAEP mathematics assessments for grades 4 and 8. In particular, we compare the performance of the high-stakes testing states, as designated by Amrein and Berliner, with the performance of the remaining states (conditioning, of course, on a state's participation in the relevant NAEP assessments). For each grade, when we examine the relative gains of states over the period, we find that the comparisons strongly favor the high-stakes testing states. Moreover, the results cannot be accounted for by differences between the two groups of states with respect to changes in percent of students excluded from NAEP over the same period. On the other hand, when we follow a particular cohort (grade 4, 1992 to grade 8, 1996 or grade 4, 1996 to grade 8, 2000), we find the comparisons slightly favor the low-stakes testing states, although the discrepancy can be partially accounted for by changes in the sets of states contributing to each comparison. In addition, we conduct a number of ancillary analyses to establish the robustness of our results, while acknowledging the tentative nature of any conclusions drawn from highly aggregated, observational data." @default.
• W2068436203 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2068436203 creator A5018912707 @default.
• W2068436203 date "2003-12-01" @default.
• W2068436203 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W2068436203 title "RECONSIDERING THE IMPACT OF HIGH-STAKES TESTING" @default.
• W2068436203 cites W12354618 @default.
• W2068436203 cites W1988592428 @default.
• W2068436203 cites W2962931718 @default.
• W2068436203 cites W4296149199 @default.
• W2068436203 doi "https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2333-8504.2003.tb01921.x" @default.
• W2068436203 hasPublicationYear "2003" @default.
• W2068436203 type Work @default.
• W2068436203 sameAs 2068436203 @default.
• W2068436203 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2068436203 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2068436203 hasAuthorship W2068436203A5018912707 @default.
• W2068436203 hasConcept C145420912 @default.
• W2068436203 hasConcept C151730666 @default.
• W2068436203 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2068436203 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2068436203 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2068436203 hasConcept C203151758 @default.
• W2068436203 hasConcept C2776007630 @default.
• W2068436203 hasConcept C2777267654 @default.
• W2068436203 hasConcept C81369262 @default.
• W2068436203 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2068436203 hasConceptScore W2068436203C145420912 @default.
• W2068436203 hasConceptScore W2068436203C151730666 @default.
• W2068436203 hasConceptScore W2068436203C15744967 @default.
• W2068436203 hasConceptScore W2068436203C17744445 @default.
• W2068436203 hasConceptScore W2068436203C199539241 @default.
• W2068436203 hasConceptScore W2068436203C203151758 @default.
• W2068436203 hasConceptScore W2068436203C2776007630 @default.
• W2068436203 hasConceptScore W2068436203C2777267654 @default.
• W2068436203 hasConceptScore W2068436203C81369262 @default.
• W2068436203 hasConceptScore W2068436203C86803240 @default.
• W2068436203 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W2068436203 hasLocation W20684362031 @default.
• W2068436203 hasOpenAccess W2068436203 @default.
• W2068436203 hasPrimaryLocation W20684362031 @default.
• W2068436203 hasRelatedWork W1603625206 @default.
• W2068436203 hasRelatedWork W2024165873 @default.
• W2068436203 hasRelatedWork W2030873036 @default.
• W2068436203 hasRelatedWork W2185748377 @default.
• W2068436203 hasRelatedWork W2354509678 @default.
• W2068436203 hasRelatedWork W27803997 @default.
• W2068436203 hasRelatedWork W2804354919 @default.
• W2068436203 hasRelatedWork W288212059 @default.
• W2068436203 hasRelatedWork W2972124004 @default.
• W2068436203 hasRelatedWork W89072677 @default.
• W2068436203 hasVolume "2003" @default.
• W2068436203 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2068436203 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2068436203 magId "2068436203" @default.
• W2068436203 workType "article" @default.