FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2068804005> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2068804005 endingPage "482" @default.
• W2068804005 startingPage "476" @default.
• W2068804005 abstract "In Brief Objectives: To develop, validate, and implement a competency assessment tool (CAT) for technical surgical performance in the context of a summative assessment process for the National Training Programme in Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery (NTP). Background: The NTP is an educational initiative by the National Cancer Action Team in England to safely increase the uptake of laparoscopic colorectal surgery. It is the first competency-based national educational initiative for specialist surgeons (consultants), and performance assessment is an integral part of the program. Methods: Content validity was sought using expert opinion by semistructured interviews and the Delphi method. For validity and reliability studies, NTP apprentices and experts were asked to submit video-recorded cases. Construct validity was established between delegates who passed the assessment and those who failed. Concurrent validity was tested by comparing scores with error counts as identified by observational clinical human reliability analysis. A fully crossed design, using generalizability theory methods and D-studies, was used for reliability. Findings: Interviews and the Delphi method revealed a list of characteristics for assessment. A hybrid structure combining task-specific and generic items was used to include important characteristics into the assessment format. Fifty-four cases were submitted. Overall reliability reached G(ACI) = 0.803 when using 2 cases and 2 assessors. Experts scored significantly better than apprentices (3.19 vs 2.60; P = 0.004), and apprentices who passed had better scores than those who failed (2.95 vs 2.28; P < 0.001). There was an inverse correlation between CAT scores and observational clinical human reliability analysis error counts (ρ = −0.520, P < 0.001). The combination of both methods reached overall sensitivity of 100%, specificity of 83.3%, a positive predictive value of 93.8%, and a negative predictive value of 100%. Conclusions: The CAT can reliably assess technical performance in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. The use of CATs to judge specialist technical performance before embarking on independent practice of new procedures is achievable on a national scale and can be adapted by other specialties. This article describes the design, validation, and implementation of a novel tool to objectively assess the quality of the technical performance of specialist laparoscopic colorectal surgeons." @default.
• W2068804005 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2068804005 creator A5001831939 @default.
• W2068804005 creator A5008612028 @default.
• W2068804005 creator A5024723559 @default.
• W2068804005 creator A5026245391 @default.
• W2068804005 creator A5027753939 @default.
• W2068804005 creator A5044425424 @default.
• W2068804005 creator A5049575711 @default.
• W2068804005 creator A5053092315 @default.
• W2068804005 creator A5063450383 @default.
• W2068804005 creator A5072627961 @default.
• W2068804005 creator A5084819345 @default.
• W2068804005 date "2013-03-01" @default.
• W2068804005 modified "2023-10-17" @default.
• W2068804005 title "Is Competency Assessment at the Specialist Level Achievable? A Study for the National Training Programme in Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery in England" @default.
• W2068804005 cites W1583022010 @default.
• W2068804005 cites W1993921437 @default.
• W2068804005 cites W1994706291 @default.
• W2068804005 cites W2000114951 @default.
• W2068804005 cites W2004490046 @default.
• W2068804005 cites W2007144078 @default.
• W2068804005 cites W2009867790 @default.
• W2068804005 cites W2017224397 @default.
• W2068804005 cites W2036051961 @default.
• W2068804005 cites W2051891087 @default.
• W2068804005 cites W2079789058 @default.
• W2068804005 cites W2081210368 @default.
• W2068804005 cites W2088569035 @default.
• W2068804005 cites W2091755610 @default.
• W2068804005 cites W2107835408 @default.
• W2068804005 cites W2128401291 @default.
• W2068804005 cites W2139001711 @default.
• W2068804005 cites W2168909631 @default.
• W2068804005 doi "https://doi.org/10.1097/sla.0b013e318275b72a" @default.
• W2068804005 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23386240" @default.
• W2068804005 hasPublicationYear "2013" @default.
• W2068804005 type Work @default.
• W2068804005 sameAs 2068804005 @default.
• W2068804005 citedByCount "93" @default.
• W2068804005 countsByYear W20688040052013 @default.
• W2068804005 countsByYear W20688040052014 @default.
• W2068804005 countsByYear W20688040052015 @default.
• W2068804005 countsByYear W20688040052016 @default.
• W2068804005 countsByYear W20688040052017 @default.
• W2068804005 countsByYear W20688040052018 @default.
• W2068804005 countsByYear W20688040052019 @default.
• W2068804005 countsByYear W20688040052020 @default.
• W2068804005 countsByYear W20688040052021 @default.
• W2068804005 countsByYear W20688040052022 @default.
• W2068804005 countsByYear W20688040052023 @default.
• W2068804005 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2068804005 hasAuthorship W2068804005A5001831939 @default.
• W2068804005 hasAuthorship W2068804005A5008612028 @default.
• W2068804005 hasAuthorship W2068804005A5024723559 @default.
• W2068804005 hasAuthorship W2068804005A5026245391 @default.
• W2068804005 hasAuthorship W2068804005A5027753939 @default.
• W2068804005 hasAuthorship W2068804005A5044425424 @default.
• W2068804005 hasAuthorship W2068804005A5049575711 @default.
• W2068804005 hasAuthorship W2068804005A5053092315 @default.
• W2068804005 hasAuthorship W2068804005A5063450383 @default.
• W2068804005 hasAuthorship W2068804005A5072627961 @default.
• W2068804005 hasAuthorship W2068804005A5084819345 @default.
• W2068804005 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
• W2068804005 hasConcept C107806365 @default.
• W2068804005 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W2068804005 hasConcept C138496976 @default.
• W2068804005 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W2068804005 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W2068804005 hasConcept C151730666 @default.
• W2068804005 hasConcept C152747807 @default.
• W2068804005 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2068804005 hasConcept C163258240 @default.
• W2068804005 hasConcept C171606756 @default.
• W2068804005 hasConcept C19417346 @default.
• W2068804005 hasConcept C23131810 @default.
• W2068804005 hasConcept C27158222 @default.
• W2068804005 hasConcept C2779343474 @default.
• W2068804005 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W2068804005 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
• W2068804005 hasConcept C42525527 @default.
• W2068804005 hasConcept C43214815 @default.
• W2068804005 hasConcept C49453240 @default.
• W2068804005 hasConcept C509550671 @default.
• W2068804005 hasConcept C60641444 @default.
• W2068804005 hasConcept C62520636 @default.
• W2068804005 hasConcept C70364389 @default.
• W2068804005 hasConcept C70410870 @default.
• W2068804005 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2068804005 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2068804005 hasConceptScore W2068804005C105795698 @default.
• W2068804005 hasConceptScore W2068804005C107806365 @default.
• W2068804005 hasConceptScore W2068804005C121332964 @default.
• W2068804005 hasConceptScore W2068804005C138496976 @default.
• W2068804005 hasConceptScore W2068804005C138885662 @default.
• W2068804005 hasConceptScore W2068804005C142724271 @default.
• W2068804005 hasConceptScore W2068804005C151730666 @default.
• W2068804005 hasConceptScore W2068804005C152747807 @default.

• next