Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2069059950> ?p ?o ?g. }
- W2069059950 endingPage "54" @default.
- W2069059950 startingPage "44" @default.
- W2069059950 abstract "The promotion of electricity generation from renewable energy sources has led to a substantial expansion of biogas production in Germany, with most biogas plants co-digesting slurry and crops, and maize being by far the most dominant substrate. At present only limited information is available on the agronomic and environmental performance of biogas cropping systems, and on the fertilizer value of biogas residues. In a two-year field experiment at two sites in northern Germany differing in soil quality, we analyzed the dry matter (DM) yield, N yield, methane yield, and the N balance of different cropping systems: (i) maize monoculture (R1), (ii) maize–whole crop wheat followed by Italian ryegrass as a double crop (R2), (iii) maize–grain wheat followed by mustard as a catch crop (R3), and (iv) perennial ryegrass ley (R4). Rotations R1, R2 and R3 were grown at Site 1 (sandy loam), whereas R1 and R4 were tested at Site 2 (humus sand). Crops were supplied with varying amounts (0–360 kg N ha−1, ryegrass: 0–480 kg N ha−1) of biogas residue, cattle slurry, pig slurry, or mineral N fertilizer, which allowed quantifying their N use efficiency in terms of apparent N recovery (ANR) and relative N fertilizer value (RNFV). No significant interactions of crop rotation and fertilizer type on DM and methane yield, plant N recovery, as well as N balance, were detected at Site 1, where R1 (19.3 t DM ha−1; 6750 m3N CH4 ha−1; N: norm conditions, i.e. 273 K, 1024 hPa) clearly out-yielded R2 (16.8 t DM ha−1; 5351 m3N CH4 ha−1) and R3 (12.8 t DM ha−1), while R2 had a higher plant N recovery. At Site 2, the perennial ryegrass ley achieved substantially lower maximum DM and methane yield (13.9 t DM ha−1; 4251 m3N CH4 ha−1) than maize monoculture (17.3 t DM ha−1; 6038 m3N CH4 ha−1). Fertilizer type affected grass performance: application of biogas residue resulted in lower yield and N recovery, but higher N balance than mineral fertilizer and cattle slurry. The N use efficiency of biogas residue application depended on the crop rotation. Biogas residue resulted in higher ANR and RNFV compared to pig slurry in R1, whilst in R2 the reverse occurred, and effects were similar to cattle slurry in R4. The results revealed that, except for grassland, substrate cropping based on biogas residues can exploit the yield potential without causing high N surplus." @default.
- W2069059950 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W2069059950 creator A5000810473 @default.
- W2069059950 creator A5001353658 @default.
- W2069059950 creator A5034886433 @default.
- W2069059950 creator A5041574277 @default.
- W2069059950 creator A5057342113 @default.
- W2069059950 creator A5061890698 @default.
- W2069059950 creator A5085249629 @default.
- W2069059950 date "2013-05-01" @default.
- W2069059950 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
- W2069059950 title "Biogas cropping systems: Short term response of yield performance and N use efficiency to biogas residue application" @default.
- W2069059950 cites W1455846880 @default.
- W2069059950 cites W1608563899 @default.
- W2069059950 cites W1964588802 @default.
- W2069059950 cites W1967544423 @default.
- W2069059950 cites W1970345648 @default.
- W2069059950 cites W1971234026 @default.
- W2069059950 cites W1979449400 @default.
- W2069059950 cites W1982531947 @default.
- W2069059950 cites W1982870074 @default.
- W2069059950 cites W1982893654 @default.
- W2069059950 cites W1984180605 @default.
- W2069059950 cites W1986377457 @default.
- W2069059950 cites W1987641926 @default.
- W2069059950 cites W1998257696 @default.
- W2069059950 cites W1998715256 @default.
- W2069059950 cites W2010198465 @default.
- W2069059950 cites W2010478425 @default.
- W2069059950 cites W2017458065 @default.
- W2069059950 cites W2017922702 @default.
- W2069059950 cites W2019115417 @default.
- W2069059950 cites W2020010522 @default.
- W2069059950 cites W2022922203 @default.
- W2069059950 cites W2026516287 @default.
- W2069059950 cites W2030360561 @default.
- W2069059950 cites W2034917524 @default.
- W2069059950 cites W2035484353 @default.
- W2069059950 cites W2036121744 @default.
- W2069059950 cites W2042569598 @default.
- W2069059950 cites W2045742822 @default.
- W2069059950 cites W2046967339 @default.
- W2069059950 cites W2048651606 @default.
- W2069059950 cites W2052452558 @default.
- W2069059950 cites W2060705129 @default.
- W2069059950 cites W2063433487 @default.
- W2069059950 cites W2063514988 @default.
- W2069059950 cites W2064587654 @default.
- W2069059950 cites W2065533118 @default.
- W2069059950 cites W2074076840 @default.
- W2069059950 cites W2074195479 @default.
- W2069059950 cites W2080029833 @default.
- W2069059950 cites W2080445509 @default.
- W2069059950 cites W2081595137 @default.
- W2069059950 cites W2083234396 @default.
- W2069059950 cites W2083397525 @default.
- W2069059950 cites W2085765456 @default.
- W2069059950 cites W2087693688 @default.
- W2069059950 cites W2090747646 @default.
- W2069059950 cites W2091849403 @default.
- W2069059950 cites W2092238810 @default.
- W2069059950 cites W2093064729 @default.
- W2069059950 cites W2093918519 @default.
- W2069059950 cites W2107000105 @default.
- W2069059950 cites W2110578802 @default.
- W2069059950 cites W2114185778 @default.
- W2069059950 cites W2146630035 @default.
- W2069059950 cites W2156472179 @default.
- W2069059950 cites W2157918818 @default.
- W2069059950 cites W2164904834 @default.
- W2069059950 cites W2167707722 @default.
- W2069059950 cites W2318774355 @default.
- W2069059950 cites W2517147196 @default.
- W2069059950 cites W4234151807 @default.
- W2069059950 cites W4250853539 @default.
- W2069059950 cites W4255293195 @default.
- W2069059950 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2013.01.002" @default.
- W2069059950 hasPublicationYear "2013" @default.
- W2069059950 type Work @default.
- W2069059950 sameAs 2069059950 @default.
- W2069059950 citedByCount "59" @default.
- W2069059950 countsByYear W20690599502013 @default.
- W2069059950 countsByYear W20690599502014 @default.
- W2069059950 countsByYear W20690599502015 @default.
- W2069059950 countsByYear W20690599502016 @default.
- W2069059950 countsByYear W20690599502017 @default.
- W2069059950 countsByYear W20690599502018 @default.
- W2069059950 countsByYear W20690599502019 @default.
- W2069059950 countsByYear W20690599502020 @default.
- W2069059950 countsByYear W20690599502021 @default.
- W2069059950 countsByYear W20690599502022 @default.
- W2069059950 countsByYear W20690599502023 @default.
- W2069059950 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2069059950 hasAuthorship W2069059950A5000810473 @default.
- W2069059950 hasAuthorship W2069059950A5001353658 @default.
- W2069059950 hasAuthorship W2069059950A5034886433 @default.
- W2069059950 hasAuthorship W2069059950A5041574277 @default.
- W2069059950 hasAuthorship W2069059950A5057342113 @default.