FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2069072410> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2069072410 endingPage "136" @default.
• W2069072410 startingPage "131" @default.
• W2069072410 abstract "Running is becoming an increasingly popular activity among Americans with over 50 million participants. Running shoe research and technology has continued to advance with no decrease in overall running injury rates. A growing group of runners are making the choice to try the minimal or barefoot running styles of the pre-modern running shoe era. There is some evidence of decreased forces and torques on the lower extremities with barefoot running, but no clear data regarding how this corresponds with injuries. The purpose of this survey study was to examine factors related to performance and injury in runners who have tried barefoot running. The University of Virginia Center for Endurance Sport created a 10-question survey regarding barefoot running that was posted on a variety of running blogs and Facebook pages. Percentages were calculated for each question across all surveys. Five hundred and nine participants responded with over 93% of them incorporating some type of barefoot running into their weekly mileage. A majority of the participants (53%) viewed barefoot running as a training tool to improve specific aspects of their running. However, close to half (46%) viewed barefoot training as a viable alternative to shoes for logging their miles. A large portion of runners initially tried barefoot running due to the promise of improved efficiency (60%), an attempt to get past injury (53%) and/or the recent media hype around the practice (52%). A large majority (68%) of runners participating in the study experienced no new injuries after starting barefoot running. In fact, most respondents (69%) actually had their previous injuries go away after starting barefoot running. Runners responded that their previous knee (46%), foot (19%), ankle (17%), hip (14%), and low back (14%) injuries all proceeded to improve after starting barefoot running. Prior studies have found that barefoot running often changes biomechanics compared to shod running with a hypothesized relationship of decreased injuries. This paper reports the result of a survey of 509 runners. The results suggest that a large percentage of this sample of runners experienced benefits or no serious harm from transitioning to barefoot or minimal shoe running." @default.
• W2069072410 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2069072410 creator A5007339656 @default.
• W2069072410 creator A5015651632 @default.
• W2069072410 creator A5063011066 @default.
• W2069072410 date "2014-06-01" @default.
• W2069072410 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
• W2069072410 title "Barefoot running survey: Evidence from the field" @default.
• W2069072410 cites W1974738468 @default.
• W2069072410 cites W1976626613 @default.
• W2069072410 cites W2000794332 @default.
• W2069072410 cites W2026649504 @default.
• W2069072410 cites W2085437812 @default.
• W2069072410 cites W2105501566 @default.
• W2069072410 cites W2118475918 @default.
• W2069072410 cites W2122682917 @default.
• W2069072410 cites W2131710383 @default.
• W2069072410 cites W2151359972 @default.
• W2069072410 cites W2151847628 @default.
• W2069072410 cites W2167498879 @default.
• W2069072410 cites W2168770196 @default.
• W2069072410 cites W2315813938 @default.
• W2069072410 cites W2323178904 @default.
• W2069072410 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jshs.2014.03.008" @default.
• W2069072410 hasPublicationYear "2014" @default.
• W2069072410 type Work @default.
• W2069072410 sameAs 2069072410 @default.
• W2069072410 citedByCount "27" @default.
• W2069072410 countsByYear W20690724102014 @default.
• W2069072410 countsByYear W20690724102015 @default.
• W2069072410 countsByYear W20690724102016 @default.
• W2069072410 countsByYear W20690724102017 @default.
• W2069072410 countsByYear W20690724102018 @default.
• W2069072410 countsByYear W20690724102019 @default.
• W2069072410 countsByYear W20690724102020 @default.
• W2069072410 countsByYear W20690724102021 @default.
• W2069072410 countsByYear W20690724102022 @default.
• W2069072410 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2069072410 hasAuthorship W2069072410A5007339656 @default.
• W2069072410 hasAuthorship W2069072410A5015651632 @default.
• W2069072410 hasAuthorship W2069072410A5063011066 @default.
• W2069072410 hasBestOaLocation W20690724101 @default.
• W2069072410 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2069072410 hasConcept C1862650 @default.
• W2069072410 hasConcept C2779342965 @default.
• W2069072410 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2069072410 hasConcept C99508421 @default.
• W2069072410 hasConceptScore W2069072410C15744967 @default.
• W2069072410 hasConceptScore W2069072410C1862650 @default.
• W2069072410 hasConceptScore W2069072410C2779342965 @default.
• W2069072410 hasConceptScore W2069072410C71924100 @default.
• W2069072410 hasConceptScore W2069072410C99508421 @default.
• W2069072410 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W2069072410 hasLocation W20690724101 @default.
• W2069072410 hasLocation W20690724102 @default.
• W2069072410 hasOpenAccess W2069072410 @default.
• W2069072410 hasPrimaryLocation W20690724101 @default.
• W2069072410 hasRelatedWork W1974612628 @default.
• W2069072410 hasRelatedWork W2012294656 @default.
• W2069072410 hasRelatedWork W2062118519 @default.
• W2069072410 hasRelatedWork W2308151434 @default.
• W2069072410 hasRelatedWork W2416900979 @default.
• W2069072410 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
• W2069072410 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
• W2069072410 hasRelatedWork W3185746031 @default.
• W2069072410 hasRelatedWork W4297785659 @default.
• W2069072410 hasRelatedWork W1937348057 @default.
• W2069072410 hasVolume "3" @default.
• W2069072410 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2069072410 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2069072410 magId "2069072410" @default.
• W2069072410 workType "article" @default.