FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2069184669> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2069184669 endingPage "64" @default.
• W2069184669 startingPage "33" @default.
• W2069184669 abstract "Historians who have examined Canadian government administration of First Nation’s resources such as minerals and agricultural land have concluded that Ottawa often failed to manage these resources in the Natives’ best interests. This article argues that the same can be said of the manner in which the Department of Indian Affairs handled First Nation timber. The story is told by examining the case of Charles W. Cox and his roughly fifteen-year (1924–40) association with the timber licence to Long Lac Reserve 77 in northern Ontario. During this period, departmental officials consistently placed patronage considerations ahead of protecting the First Nation’s interests, breaking numerous rules and regulations in the process. They did so even though a string of observers - from members of the First Nation to federal cabinet ministers - made the department acutely aware of the irresponsible manner in which it was managing the reserve’s timber. Throughout this affair, it seemed as though no stimulus could prod government officials into fulfilling their duty as guardian of both the Natives and their resources. Abstract: Les historiens qui se sont penches sur l’administration publique par le Canada des ressources des Premieres nations telles que les mineraux et les terres agricoles ont conclu qu’Ottawa a souvent failli dans sa tâche a gerer ces ressources dans le meilleur interet des Autochtones. Cet article soutient qu’on peut dire la meme chose en ce qui concerne la facon dont le ministere des Affaires indiennes a traite les ressources forestieres des Premieres nations. On raconte l’histoire en examinant le cas de Charles W. Cox et de son implication longue d’environ quinze ans (1924–1940) dans le permis de coupe accorde a la Reserve Long Lac dans le nord de l’Ontario. Au cours de cette periode, les hauts fonctionnaires du ministere ont constamment fait passer le favoritisme avant la protection des interets des Premieres nations, sans hesiter a enfreindre les reglements. Ils agirent ainsi malgre le fait qu’une kyrielle d’observateurs -des membres des Premieres nations aux ministres du Cabinet federal -firent comprendre au ministere que sa facon de gerer les forets de la reserve etait tout a fait irresponsable. Dans toute cette affaire, il semblait qu’absolument rien ne put forcer les fonctionnaires du gouvernement a s’acquitter de leurs devoirs en tant que gardiens a la fois des Autochtones et de leurs ressources." @default.
• W2069184669 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2069184669 creator A5082684353 @default.
• W2069184669 date "2003-03-01" @default.
• W2069184669 modified "2023-10-18" @default.
• W2069184669 title "‘Nothing it seems can be done about it’: Charlie Cox, Indian Affairs Timber Policy, and the Long Lac Reserve, 1924-40" @default.
• W2069184669 cites W1840423626 @default.
• W2069184669 cites W1981724140 @default.
• W2069184669 cites W2121906993 @default.
• W2069184669 cites W2122361759 @default.
• W2069184669 cites W2127153997 @default.
• W2069184669 cites W2143874312 @default.
• W2069184669 cites W2157663863 @default.
• W2069184669 cites W2330794862 @default.
• W2069184669 cites W66455165 @default.
• W2069184669 doi "https://doi.org/10.3138/chr.84.1.33" @default.
• W2069184669 hasPublicationYear "2003" @default.
• W2069184669 type Work @default.
• W2069184669 sameAs 2069184669 @default.
• W2069184669 citedByCount "5" @default.
• W2069184669 countsByYear W20691846692016 @default.
• W2069184669 countsByYear W20691846692017 @default.
• W2069184669 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2069184669 hasAuthorship W2069184669A5082684353 @default.
• W2069184669 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W2069184669 hasConcept C142362112 @default.
• W2069184669 hasConcept C15708023 @default.
• W2069184669 hasConcept C166957645 @default.
• W2069184669 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2069184669 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2069184669 hasConcept C2549261 @default.
• W2069184669 hasConcept C2778137410 @default.
• W2069184669 hasConcept C2780765947 @default.
• W2069184669 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
• W2069184669 hasConcept C54745167 @default.
• W2069184669 hasConcept C95457728 @default.
• W2069184669 hasConceptScore W2069184669C138885662 @default.
• W2069184669 hasConceptScore W2069184669C142362112 @default.
• W2069184669 hasConceptScore W2069184669C15708023 @default.
• W2069184669 hasConceptScore W2069184669C166957645 @default.
• W2069184669 hasConceptScore W2069184669C17744445 @default.
• W2069184669 hasConceptScore W2069184669C199539241 @default.
• W2069184669 hasConceptScore W2069184669C2549261 @default.
• W2069184669 hasConceptScore W2069184669C2778137410 @default.
• W2069184669 hasConceptScore W2069184669C2780765947 @default.
• W2069184669 hasConceptScore W2069184669C41895202 @default.
• W2069184669 hasConceptScore W2069184669C54745167 @default.
• W2069184669 hasConceptScore W2069184669C95457728 @default.
• W2069184669 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W2069184669 hasLocation W20691846691 @default.
• W2069184669 hasOpenAccess W2069184669 @default.
• W2069184669 hasPrimaryLocation W20691846691 @default.
• W2069184669 hasRelatedWork W1480723236 @default.
• W2069184669 hasRelatedWork W2122585864 @default.
• W2069184669 hasRelatedWork W2152849920 @default.
• W2069184669 hasRelatedWork W2312514561 @default.
• W2069184669 hasRelatedWork W2499538714 @default.
• W2069184669 hasRelatedWork W2506414892 @default.
• W2069184669 hasRelatedWork W3091293128 @default.
• W2069184669 hasRelatedWork W416688014 @default.
• W2069184669 hasRelatedWork W4236445862 @default.
• W2069184669 hasRelatedWork W4243967174 @default.
• W2069184669 hasVolume "84" @default.
• W2069184669 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2069184669 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2069184669 magId "2069184669" @default.
• W2069184669 workType "article" @default.