FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2069232783> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2069232783 endingPage "695" @default.
• W2069232783 startingPage "673" @default.
• W2069232783 abstract "For me, the distinctive event in the recent history of social and cultural anthropology in the United States has been, since the 1980s, a profound cutting of the discipline (or rather of this influential component of the four-field disciplinary organization of general anthropology) from its moorings that defined it through much of the twentieth century. Certainly the discipline is still wedded functionally to certain aspects of the institutional model which has shaped the identity of social and cultural anthropologists, as pioneered through the works of such figures as Bronislaw Malinowski in England and Franz Boas in the United States. Most anthropologists still begin their careers with a geographical area specialization outside the U.S. (although few receive the intensive areas studies education that was available and encouraged in the U.S. during the 1950s through the 1970s when in the atmosphere of the Cold War and development studies there was a huge investment in such interdisciplinary programs that has since waned; also Europe itself has become a much more legitimate foreign area for U.S. anthropologists, and certain specializations like science and technology studies have gained a prestige and legitimacy equivalent to traditional foreign area specialization). And at least for their initiatory, dissertation research, most anthropologists still participate within the bounds of the method of fieldwork and ethnography, the ethos and pedagogical mythologies of which have been set by the tradition established by the founding figures. However, the ways that careers evolve, and even now are increasingly conceived; the actual nature of the experience of fieldwork and how fieldwork stories are told and passed on professionally as a means of learning its norms; how objects of study are conceptualized; and whose anthropology's primary interdisciplinary partners are-all of these matters crucial to the professional reproduction of anthropology-have changed dramatically. When I became a professional anthropologist in the mid-1970s, I prepared at Harvard through the usual apprentice model. I became identified as a specialist on Oceania, and I did longterm fieldwork in western Polynesia (mainly in the Tongan islands). My fieldwork was shaped categorically through basic concerns with kinship, ritual, politics, and religion by means of resident inquiry in local communities. While, by this time, at least in the graduate student culture, the influence of such French poststructuralists as Foucault and Barthes, the work of feminist scholars, the relevance of British cultural studies, the attempt to create a structuralist history (as against reigning Marxist alternatives), and a sensitivity to the politics of fieldwork (an effect of the short-lived turbulence of the 60's in the US) were all in the atmosphere, so to speak,if not in the class room, I and my colleagues could still be understood to be doing basic peoples and places ethnographic research. While we might have come to see, even then, different theoretical and topical outlines for our apprentice work, it still participated by its very form in adding to the global ethnographic archive, as comparative material or puzzles, for the historic, unfulfilled, and one could say, interrupted, but still ideologically hegemonic grand project of a general science of humans, the special task of social and cultural anthropology being to describe and analyze forms of life that were, if not pre-modern, then non-modern. While many younger anthropologists,especially in the elite graduate programs, did not in their convictions or perceptions subscribe fully to this program, participating in the discipline meant following it anyhow, through the form of the ethnography and the expectations of fieldwork,which were indeed often the major attraction in undertaking training in anthropology. Even then, and certainly before and now, the research projects of anthropologists in the U.S. were quite diverse. …" @default.
• W2069232783 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2069232783 creator A5063688066 @default.
• W2069232783 date "2005-01-01" @default.
• W2069232783 modified "2023-10-03" @default.
• W2069232783 title "The Passion of Anthropology in the U.S., Circa 2004" @default.
• W2069232783 cites W1500706543 @default.
• W2069232783 cites W1513962461 @default.
• W2069232783 cites W1520239515 @default.
• W2069232783 cites W1535655797 @default.
• W2069232783 cites W1550683620 @default.
• W2069232783 cites W1555766061 @default.
• W2069232783 cites W1979731710 @default.
• W2069232783 cites W2076207356 @default.
• W2069232783 cites W2093484810 @default.
• W2069232783 cites W2152534083 @default.
• W2069232783 cites W2158766809 @default.
• W2069232783 cites W2222290688 @default.
• W2069232783 cites W259764504 @default.
• W2069232783 cites W2902278184 @default.
• W2069232783 cites W612918924 @default.
• W2069232783 cites W659478208 @default.
• W2069232783 doi "https://doi.org/10.1353/anq.2005.0036" @default.
• W2069232783 hasPublicationYear "2005" @default.
• W2069232783 type Work @default.
• W2069232783 sameAs 2069232783 @default.
• W2069232783 citedByCount "20" @default.
• W2069232783 countsByYear W20692327832012 @default.
• W2069232783 countsByYear W20692327832013 @default.
• W2069232783 countsByYear W20692327832022 @default.
• W2069232783 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2069232783 hasAuthorship W2069232783A5063688066 @default.
• W2069232783 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W2069232783 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2069232783 hasConcept C19165224 @default.
• W2069232783 hasConcept C205649164 @default.
• W2069232783 hasConcept C2780310893 @default.
• W2069232783 hasConcept C542102704 @default.
• W2069232783 hasConceptScore W2069232783C144024400 @default.
• W2069232783 hasConceptScore W2069232783C15744967 @default.
• W2069232783 hasConceptScore W2069232783C19165224 @default.
• W2069232783 hasConceptScore W2069232783C205649164 @default.
• W2069232783 hasConceptScore W2069232783C2780310893 @default.
• W2069232783 hasConceptScore W2069232783C542102704 @default.
• W2069232783 hasIssue "3" @default.
• W2069232783 hasLocation W20692327831 @default.
• W2069232783 hasOpenAccess W2069232783 @default.
• W2069232783 hasPrimaryLocation W20692327831 @default.
• W2069232783 hasRelatedWork W1975204426 @default.
• W2069232783 hasRelatedWork W1975662923 @default.
• W2069232783 hasRelatedWork W2035745413 @default.
• W2069232783 hasRelatedWork W2069232783 @default.
• W2069232783 hasRelatedWork W2268254551 @default.
• W2069232783 hasRelatedWork W2317722987 @default.
• W2069232783 hasRelatedWork W2321816158 @default.
• W2069232783 hasRelatedWork W2323652808 @default.
• W2069232783 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
• W2069232783 hasRelatedWork W2796310415 @default.
• W2069232783 hasVolume "78" @default.
• W2069232783 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2069232783 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2069232783 magId "2069232783" @default.
• W2069232783 workType "article" @default.