FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2069476772> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2069476772 endingPage "798" @default.
• W2069476772 startingPage "792" @default.
• W2069476772 abstract "The aim of the study was to analyze the functional and physiologic outcome of patients undergoing laparoscopic rectocele repair compared to a matched cohort undergoing transanal repair.Forty patients with a rectocele who had undergone laparoscopic pelvic floor repair by a laparoscopic gynecologist were matched for age and rectocele size with 40 patients who had undergone a transanal repair by a colorectal surgeon. All patients had clinical evidence of a symptomatic rectocele. All patients were assessed postoperatively with a quality of life (SF-36) score, a modified St. Mark's continence score, a urinary dysfunction score, a Watt's sexual dysfunction score, and a linear analog patient satisfaction score. Fifteen patients in each group had also undergone preoperative and postoperative anal manometry.At 44 months median follow-up, the transanal approach resulted in significantly more patients reporting bowel symptom alleviation (P < 0.002) and higher patient satisfaction (P < 0.003). The bowel symptom improvement was also sustained over a significantly longer period (P < 0.03). Only 11 patients (28 percent) in the laparoscopic group reported more than 50 percent improvement in their bowel symptoms compared to 25 patients (63 percent) in the transanal group. On univariate analysis of 50 percent bowel symptom improvement, a larger rectocele (P < 0.009), transanal repair (P < 0.02), and presenting with obstructive defecation rather than fecal incontinence (P < 0.03) were statistically significant. Rectocele size (P < 0.012) and treatment cohort (P < 0.006) remained significant on multivariate analysis. Postoperatively, bowel symptom alleviation correlated with patient satisfaction in both groups (P < 0.015). Although not statistically significant, five patients (13 percent) in the transanal group developed postoperative fecal incontinence, which was associated with a low maximum anal resting pressure preoperatively that was further diminished postoperatively (P > 0.06). Only one patient (3 percent) in the laparoscopic group reported a decline in fecal continence, but four patients (10 percent) reported worsening of their symptoms of obstructed defecation. Postoperative dyspareunia was reported by 24 patients in total (30 percent), with significantly more in the transanal group (P > 0.05).The transanal repair results in a statistically greater alleviation of bowel symptoms and greater patient satisfaction scores. However, this approach may have a greater degree of functional co-morbidity than the laparoscopic rectocele repair." @default.
• W2069476772 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2069476772 creator A5004049984 @default.
• W2069476772 creator A5038933114 @default.
• W2069476772 creator A5090994845 @default.
• W2069476772 date "2005-04-01" @default.
• W2069476772 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W2069476772 title "Laparoscopic or Transanal Repair of Rectocele? A Retrospective Matched Cohort Study" @default.
• W2069476772 cites W1968104196 @default.
• W2069476772 cites W1975869682 @default.
• W2069476772 cites W1983828899 @default.
• W2069476772 cites W1994461328 @default.
• W2069476772 cites W2000699731 @default.
• W2069476772 cites W2015635389 @default.
• W2069476772 cites W2016021371 @default.
• W2069476772 cites W2026050549 @default.
• W2069476772 cites W2029858655 @default.
• W2069476772 cites W2032480746 @default.
• W2069476772 cites W2037624558 @default.
• W2069476772 cites W2042303109 @default.
• W2069476772 cites W2044843942 @default.
• W2069476772 cites W2045367897 @default.
• W2069476772 cites W2046193565 @default.
• W2069476772 cites W2057281874 @default.
• W2069476772 cites W2062916276 @default.
• W2069476772 cites W2064507717 @default.
• W2069476772 cites W2064697962 @default.
• W2069476772 cites W2085052017 @default.
• W2069476772 cites W2089781424 @default.
• W2069476772 cites W2091293210 @default.
• W2069476772 cites W2130074082 @default.
• W2069476772 cites W2146313117 @default.
• W2069476772 cites W2154412554 @default.
• W2069476772 cites W2325545712 @default.
• W2069476772 cites W2333092299 @default.
• W2069476772 cites W2790238863 @default.
• W2069476772 cites W4252966088 @default.
• W2069476772 cites W4292806894 @default.
• W2069476772 doi "https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-004-0843-1" @default.
• W2069476772 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15785902" @default.
• W2069476772 hasPublicationYear "2005" @default.
• W2069476772 type Work @default.
• W2069476772 sameAs 2069476772 @default.
• W2069476772 citedByCount "37" @default.
• W2069476772 countsByYear W20694767722012 @default.
• W2069476772 countsByYear W20694767722013 @default.
• W2069476772 countsByYear W20694767722014 @default.
• W2069476772 countsByYear W20694767722016 @default.
• W2069476772 countsByYear W20694767722017 @default.
• W2069476772 countsByYear W20694767722018 @default.
• W2069476772 countsByYear W20694767722019 @default.
• W2069476772 countsByYear W20694767722022 @default.
• W2069476772 countsByYear W20694767722023 @default.
• W2069476772 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2069476772 hasAuthorship W2069476772A5004049984 @default.
• W2069476772 hasAuthorship W2069476772A5038933114 @default.
• W2069476772 hasAuthorship W2069476772A5090994845 @default.
• W2069476772 hasConcept C108797546 @default.
• W2069476772 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2069476772 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2069476772 hasConcept C144301174 @default.
• W2069476772 hasConcept C159110408 @default.
• W2069476772 hasConcept C167135981 @default.
• W2069476772 hasConcept C201903717 @default.
• W2069476772 hasConcept C2775944032 @default.
• W2069476772 hasConcept C2776813522 @default.
• W2069476772 hasConcept C2779951463 @default.
• W2069476772 hasConcept C2780120127 @default.
• W2069476772 hasConcept C38180746 @default.
• W2069476772 hasConcept C523026621 @default.
• W2069476772 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2069476772 hasConcept C72563966 @default.
• W2069476772 hasConceptScore W2069476772C108797546 @default.
• W2069476772 hasConceptScore W2069476772C126322002 @default.
• W2069476772 hasConceptScore W2069476772C141071460 @default.
• W2069476772 hasConceptScore W2069476772C144301174 @default.
• W2069476772 hasConceptScore W2069476772C159110408 @default.
• W2069476772 hasConceptScore W2069476772C167135981 @default.
• W2069476772 hasConceptScore W2069476772C201903717 @default.
• W2069476772 hasConceptScore W2069476772C2775944032 @default.
• W2069476772 hasConceptScore W2069476772C2776813522 @default.
• W2069476772 hasConceptScore W2069476772C2779951463 @default.
• W2069476772 hasConceptScore W2069476772C2780120127 @default.
• W2069476772 hasConceptScore W2069476772C38180746 @default.
• W2069476772 hasConceptScore W2069476772C523026621 @default.
• W2069476772 hasConceptScore W2069476772C71924100 @default.
• W2069476772 hasConceptScore W2069476772C72563966 @default.
• W2069476772 hasIssue "4" @default.
• W2069476772 hasLocation W20694767721 @default.
• W2069476772 hasLocation W20694767722 @default.
• W2069476772 hasOpenAccess W2069476772 @default.
• W2069476772 hasPrimaryLocation W20694767721 @default.
• W2069476772 hasRelatedWork W1966199254 @default.
• W2069476772 hasRelatedWork W1973455451 @default.
• W2069476772 hasRelatedWork W1984720346 @default.
• W2069476772 hasRelatedWork W2011698497 @default.
• W2069476772 hasRelatedWork W2025624289 @default.
• W2069476772 hasRelatedWork W2093067876 @default.

• next