FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2069638824> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2069638824 endingPage "841" @default.
• W2069638824 startingPage "834" @default.
• W2069638824 abstract "Background Although the wireless Bravo pH system is effective, some patients experience retrosternal sensations possibly caused by esophageal sensitivity that may complicate clinical application. Methods Ambulatory pH of 40 consecutive patients with GERD who had erosive esophagitis or nonerosive reflux disease, were monitored for 2 days with the Bravo system. Results were stratified and compared on the basis of self-awareness of the intraesophageal capsule. Results Pathologic acid reflux was diagnosed in 20 patients and normal reflux was diagnosed in 20 patients. Seventeen patients (42.5%) reported retrosternal discomfort, and 12 of them (70.6%) had normal reflux. Patients with retrosternal discomfort were less likely to have moderate endoscopic esophagitis, i.e., Los Angeles classification grades B, C, and D endoscopic esophagitis (p = 0.006), and were less likely to have significantly elevated esophageal acid exposure (p = 0.0036) than those who did not perceive the discomfort. Reported discomfort was not associated with age, gender, or the presence of endoscopic esophagitis. Conclusions The negative correlation between Bravo-capsule–induced retrosternal discomfort and esophageal-acid exposure indicates modified mechanical afferent nerve function after long-term acid stimulation. Capsule-induced retrosternal discomfort in the presence of normal acid exposure suggests functional heartburn. Although the wireless Bravo pH system is effective, some patients experience retrosternal sensations possibly caused by esophageal sensitivity that may complicate clinical application. Ambulatory pH of 40 consecutive patients with GERD who had erosive esophagitis or nonerosive reflux disease, were monitored for 2 days with the Bravo system. Results were stratified and compared on the basis of self-awareness of the intraesophageal capsule. Pathologic acid reflux was diagnosed in 20 patients and normal reflux was diagnosed in 20 patients. Seventeen patients (42.5%) reported retrosternal discomfort, and 12 of them (70.6%) had normal reflux. Patients with retrosternal discomfort were less likely to have moderate endoscopic esophagitis, i.e., Los Angeles classification grades B, C, and D endoscopic esophagitis (p = 0.006), and were less likely to have significantly elevated esophageal acid exposure (p = 0.0036) than those who did not perceive the discomfort. Reported discomfort was not associated with age, gender, or the presence of endoscopic esophagitis. The negative correlation between Bravo-capsule–induced retrosternal discomfort and esophageal-acid exposure indicates modified mechanical afferent nerve function after long-term acid stimulation. Capsule-induced retrosternal discomfort in the presence of normal acid exposure suggests functional heartburn." @default.
• W2069638824 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2069638824 creator A5018249021 @default.
• W2069638824 creator A5026193633 @default.
• W2069638824 creator A5044827208 @default.
• W2069638824 creator A5046164308 @default.
• W2069638824 creator A5071238501 @default.
• W2069638824 creator A5071816278 @default.
• W2069638824 creator A5079519227 @default.
• W2069638824 date "2005-12-01" @default.
• W2069638824 modified "2023-10-18" @default.
• W2069638824 title "Patients with functional heartburn are more likely to report retrosternal discomfort during wireless pH monitoring" @default.
• W2069638824 cites W1873448316 @default.
• W2069638824 cites W1956992458 @default.
• W2069638824 cites W1979634618 @default.
• W2069638824 cites W1991144509 @default.
• W2069638824 cites W1993283904 @default.
• W2069638824 cites W1995242255 @default.
• W2069638824 cites W2001963043 @default.
• W2069638824 cites W2005133417 @default.
• W2069638824 cites W2028867151 @default.
• W2069638824 cites W2056040457 @default.
• W2069638824 cites W2060152915 @default.
• W2069638824 cites W2067455414 @default.
• W2069638824 cites W2081077048 @default.
• W2069638824 cites W2083247558 @default.
• W2069638824 cites W2101185206 @default.
• W2069638824 cites W2119406097 @default.
• W2069638824 cites W2133054348 @default.
• W2069638824 cites W2320864524 @default.
• W2069638824 cites W2418657017 @default.
• W2069638824 cites W2883888396 @default.
• W2069638824 cites W4238265994 @default.
• W2069638824 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/s0016-5107(05)00317-2" @default.
• W2069638824 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16301022" @default.
• W2069638824 hasPublicationYear "2005" @default.
• W2069638824 type Work @default.
• W2069638824 sameAs 2069638824 @default.
• W2069638824 citedByCount "29" @default.
• W2069638824 countsByYear W20696388242012 @default.
• W2069638824 countsByYear W20696388242013 @default.
• W2069638824 countsByYear W20696388242017 @default.
• W2069638824 countsByYear W20696388242019 @default.
• W2069638824 countsByYear W20696388242021 @default.
• W2069638824 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2069638824 hasAuthorship W2069638824A5018249021 @default.
• W2069638824 hasAuthorship W2069638824A5026193633 @default.
• W2069638824 hasAuthorship W2069638824A5044827208 @default.
• W2069638824 hasAuthorship W2069638824A5046164308 @default.
• W2069638824 hasAuthorship W2069638824A5071238501 @default.
• W2069638824 hasAuthorship W2069638824A5071816278 @default.
• W2069638824 hasAuthorship W2069638824A5079519227 @default.
• W2069638824 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2069638824 hasConcept C2776462128 @default.
• W2069638824 hasConcept C2777014526 @default.
• W2069638824 hasConcept C2777819096 @default.
• W2069638824 hasConcept C2778778583 @default.
• W2069638824 hasConcept C2779134260 @default.
• W2069638824 hasConcept C2779920096 @default.
• W2069638824 hasConcept C2779949763 @default.
• W2069638824 hasConcept C2780323790 @default.
• W2069638824 hasConcept C2909576783 @default.
• W2069638824 hasConcept C35785553 @default.
• W2069638824 hasConcept C43270747 @default.
• W2069638824 hasConcept C59822182 @default.
• W2069638824 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2069638824 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2069638824 hasConcept C90924648 @default.
• W2069638824 hasConceptScore W2069638824C126322002 @default.
• W2069638824 hasConceptScore W2069638824C2776462128 @default.
• W2069638824 hasConceptScore W2069638824C2777014526 @default.
• W2069638824 hasConceptScore W2069638824C2777819096 @default.
• W2069638824 hasConceptScore W2069638824C2778778583 @default.
• W2069638824 hasConceptScore W2069638824C2779134260 @default.
• W2069638824 hasConceptScore W2069638824C2779920096 @default.
• W2069638824 hasConceptScore W2069638824C2779949763 @default.
• W2069638824 hasConceptScore W2069638824C2780323790 @default.
• W2069638824 hasConceptScore W2069638824C2909576783 @default.
• W2069638824 hasConceptScore W2069638824C35785553 @default.
• W2069638824 hasConceptScore W2069638824C43270747 @default.
• W2069638824 hasConceptScore W2069638824C59822182 @default.
• W2069638824 hasConceptScore W2069638824C71924100 @default.
• W2069638824 hasConceptScore W2069638824C86803240 @default.
• W2069638824 hasConceptScore W2069638824C90924648 @default.
• W2069638824 hasIssue "6" @default.
• W2069638824 hasLocation W20696388241 @default.
• W2069638824 hasLocation W20696388242 @default.
• W2069638824 hasOpenAccess W2069638824 @default.
• W2069638824 hasPrimaryLocation W20696388241 @default.
• W2069638824 hasRelatedWork W2002868055 @default.
• W2069638824 hasRelatedWork W2020849423 @default.
• W2069638824 hasRelatedWork W2038062995 @default.
• W2069638824 hasRelatedWork W2048527601 @default.
• W2069638824 hasRelatedWork W2265437640 @default.
• W2069638824 hasRelatedWork W2461403891 @default.
• W2069638824 hasRelatedWork W2982075323 @default.
• W2069638824 hasRelatedWork W3029008217 @default.
• W2069638824 hasRelatedWork W4285154846 @default.

• next