FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2069845632> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2069845632 endingPage "19" @default.
• W2069845632 startingPage "1" @default.
• W2069845632 abstract "Decisions on whether to modify the seismic performance of an existing building may depend on the comparative economic consequences of the approaches under consideration. The measures of economic consequences assessed include benefit–cost ratio, probable maximum loss, and insurance payments with different deductibles. These measures are applied to a three building complex of welded steel moment frames. Fourteen different repair schemes for the damaged buildings were evaluated for a typical Los Angeles site. The repair and retrofit approaches include: repair to former condition; modify the connections; modify the structural system with braces or shear walls; and, add dampers. The evaluation indicates that for the specific buildings some repair and modification approaches are cost–beneficial, depending on the time period and interest rate assumptions. The preferred options were then examined for PML and insurance indicators of economic impact. Many financial institutions require the probable maximum loss to be less than a threshold number and/or that insurance be purchased to be considered for financing. A PML analysis indicates that only some of the options should be considered further. The best of the near cost–beneficial options reduced the PML by a factor of two. If insurance was bought for a 5-year term, then repairing the buildings to their former condition yields a 19·5% probability of an insurance loss (damage less the amount deductible) being paid in the 5-year period, with a median payment of 6%, and a 10% probability of a payment more than 17%. Modifying the structural system in the most cost-effective manner yields a 5·2% probability of an insurance loss being paid in the 5-year period, with a median payment of 5%, and a 10% probability of a payment more than 15%. The analysis indicates that the key question in making such assessments is whether earthquake insurance is purchased or not. If insurance costs are included in the economic analysis, then more of the approaches to repair are cost effective than if not. © 1998 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd." @default.
• W2069845632 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2069845632 creator A5014622561 @default.
• W2069845632 creator A5044182480 @default.
• W2069845632 date "1998-03-01" @default.
• W2069845632 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
• W2069845632 title "Economic analysis of earthquake retrofit options: an application to welded steel moment frames" @default.
• W2069845632 cites W1980714194 @default.
• W2069845632 cites W2032551471 @default.
• W2069845632 doi "https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1099-1794(199803)7:1<1::aid-tal99>3.0.co;2-d" @default.
• W2069845632 hasPublicationYear "1998" @default.
• W2069845632 type Work @default.
• W2069845632 sameAs 2069845632 @default.
• W2069845632 citedByCount "6" @default.
• W2069845632 countsByYear W20698456322012 @default.
• W2069845632 countsByYear W20698456322014 @default.
• W2069845632 countsByYear W20698456322015 @default.
• W2069845632 countsByYear W20698456322017 @default.
• W2069845632 countsByYear W20698456322019 @default.
• W2069845632 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2069845632 hasAuthorship W2069845632A5014622561 @default.
• W2069845632 hasAuthorship W2069845632A5044182480 @default.
• W2069845632 hasConcept C10138342 @default.
• W2069845632 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W2069845632 hasConcept C134512083 @default.
• W2069845632 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W2069845632 hasConcept C145097563 @default.
• W2069845632 hasConcept C147176958 @default.
• W2069845632 hasConcept C162118730 @default.
• W2069845632 hasConcept C19474535 @default.
• W2069845632 hasConcept C2776829726 @default.
• W2069845632 hasConcept C2988805333 @default.
• W2069845632 hasConcept C29979489 @default.
• W2069845632 hasConcept C66938386 @default.
• W2069845632 hasConcept C78519656 @default.
• W2069845632 hasConceptScore W2069845632C10138342 @default.
• W2069845632 hasConceptScore W2069845632C127413603 @default.
• W2069845632 hasConceptScore W2069845632C134512083 @default.
• W2069845632 hasConceptScore W2069845632C144133560 @default.
• W2069845632 hasConceptScore W2069845632C145097563 @default.
• W2069845632 hasConceptScore W2069845632C147176958 @default.
• W2069845632 hasConceptScore W2069845632C162118730 @default.
• W2069845632 hasConceptScore W2069845632C19474535 @default.
• W2069845632 hasConceptScore W2069845632C2776829726 @default.
• W2069845632 hasConceptScore W2069845632C2988805333 @default.
• W2069845632 hasConceptScore W2069845632C29979489 @default.
• W2069845632 hasConceptScore W2069845632C66938386 @default.
• W2069845632 hasConceptScore W2069845632C78519656 @default.
• W2069845632 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W2069845632 hasLocation W20698456321 @default.
• W2069845632 hasOpenAccess W2069845632 @default.
• W2069845632 hasPrimaryLocation W20698456321 @default.
• W2069845632 hasRelatedWork W1701177536 @default.
• W2069845632 hasRelatedWork W2069845632 @default.
• W2069845632 hasRelatedWork W2417143897 @default.
• W2069845632 hasRelatedWork W2473931637 @default.
• W2069845632 hasRelatedWork W2946093540 @default.
• W2069845632 hasRelatedWork W3006430107 @default.
• W2069845632 hasRelatedWork W3137138558 @default.
• W2069845632 hasRelatedWork W4213058045 @default.
• W2069845632 hasRelatedWork W4246283955 @default.
• W2069845632 hasRelatedWork W4386108146 @default.
• W2069845632 hasVolume "7" @default.
• W2069845632 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2069845632 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2069845632 magId "2069845632" @default.
• W2069845632 workType "article" @default.