FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2070105801> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2070105801 endingPage "27" @default.
• W2070105801 startingPage "27" @default.
• W2070105801 abstract "Abstract Background: There is a paucity of midterm results comparing the efficacy of minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass (MIDCAB) and off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) with standard coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). In addition, the advent of innovative techniques may have improved midterm results for patients who undergo MIDCAB and OPCAB (MID-OPCAB). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the midterm survival results of higher-risk patient groups who have undergone CABG or MID-OPCAB with or without the use of innovative techniques. Methods: From January 1992 through March 2002, 3670 consecutive patients underwent coronary artery bypass procedures, and their predicted surgical risks were calculated according to the logistic EuroSCORE. The cases of 52 MIDCAB patients and 1796 CABG patients with similar higher-risk EuroSCOREs (11.5 versus 11.4, respectively) who underwent operations from January 1992 to December 1997 were compared (study A). The cases of 89 patients with MID-OPCAB (employing innovative techniques) and 796 patients with CABG (EuroSCORE, 13.2 versus 13.3, respectively) whose operations took place between 1998 and 2002 were also compared (study B). The National Death Index was used to access mortality data, and Kaplan-Meier curves were constructed for each group of patients. Numbers of arterial grafts, numbers of anastomoses, major complications, in-hospital lengths of stay (LOS), and 30-day mortality rates were noted. Results: In study A, there were no significant differences in the 30-day mortality rates (2.5% versus 3.9%), incidences of major complications (11.5% versus 16.6%), and LOS (13 days versus 11.7 days) for the MID-OPCAB and CABG patients, respectively. CABG patients received more arterial grafts (47.1% versus 28.9%; P =.011), received more distal anastomoses (3.4 versus 2.7; P <.001), and had better survival as estimated by Kaplan-Meier curves (94.5 months versus 82.1 months; P =.023). In study B, there were no differences in 30-day mortality rates (3.1% versus 2.3%) and incidences of major complications (10.1% versus 12.7%) for MID-OPCAB and CABG patients, respectively. CABG patients received more arterial grafts (72% versus 57.3%; P =.004) and more distal anastomoses (3.5 versus 2.8; P <.001). However, LOS was shorter for MID-OPCAB patients (7.2 days versus 9.6 days; P =.019), and there was no difference in survival time as estimated by Kaplan-Meier curves (47 months versus 46.4 months; P =.534). Conclusions: The advent of innovative surgery significantly improved LOS and equalized the rate of survival to 5 years in higher-risk MID-OPCAB patients, compared with similar-risk CABG patients." @default.
• W2070105801 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2070105801 creator A5052492760 @default.
• W2070105801 creator A5053928073 @default.
• W2070105801 creator A5062732706 @default.
• W2070105801 creator A5067595858 @default.
• W2070105801 creator A5072997937 @default.
• W2070105801 creator A5077684717 @default.
• W2070105801 date "2005-01-04" @default.
• W2070105801 modified "2023-09-25" @default.
• W2070105801 title "Influence of Innovative Techniques on Midterm Results in Patients with Minimally Invasive Direct Coronary Artery Bypass and Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass" @default.
• W2070105801 cites W1515825864 @default.
• W2070105801 cites W174623179 @default.
• W2070105801 cites W1949761647 @default.
• W2070105801 cites W1964106732 @default.
• W2070105801 cites W1970423350 @default.
• W2070105801 cites W1994061205 @default.
• W2070105801 cites W1996028190 @default.
• W2070105801 cites W2000409991 @default.
• W2070105801 cites W2006055061 @default.
• W2070105801 cites W2013611599 @default.
• W2070105801 cites W2023325651 @default.
• W2070105801 cites W2026486105 @default.
• W2070105801 cites W2041218993 @default.
• W2070105801 cites W2046383076 @default.
• W2070105801 cites W2050151962 @default.
• W2070105801 cites W2055014316 @default.
• W2070105801 cites W2067794941 @default.
• W2070105801 cites W2074508649 @default.
• W2070105801 cites W2078732826 @default.
• W2070105801 cites W2087703196 @default.
• W2070105801 cites W2108349586 @default.
• W2070105801 cites W2136984429 @default.
• W2070105801 cites W2152726623 @default.
• W2070105801 cites W2156202966 @default.
• W2070105801 cites W2156306048 @default.
• W2070105801 cites W2398136463 @default.
• W2070105801 doi "https://doi.org/10.1532/hsf.1062" @default.
• W2070105801 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/14980846" @default.
• W2070105801 hasPublicationYear "2005" @default.
• W2070105801 type Work @default.
• W2070105801 sameAs 2070105801 @default.
• W2070105801 citedByCount "1" @default.
• W2070105801 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2070105801 hasAuthorship W2070105801A5052492760 @default.
• W2070105801 hasAuthorship W2070105801A5053928073 @default.
• W2070105801 hasAuthorship W2070105801A5062732706 @default.
• W2070105801 hasAuthorship W2070105801A5067595858 @default.
• W2070105801 hasAuthorship W2070105801A5072997937 @default.
• W2070105801 hasAuthorship W2070105801A5077684717 @default.
• W2070105801 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2070105801 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2070105801 hasConcept C164705383 @default.
• W2070105801 hasConcept C2776820930 @default.
• W2070105801 hasConcept C2779040412 @default.
• W2070105801 hasConcept C2780069944 @default.
• W2070105801 hasConcept C3017915907 @default.
• W2070105801 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2070105801 hasConcept C8443397 @default.
• W2070105801 hasConceptScore W2070105801C126322002 @default.
• W2070105801 hasConceptScore W2070105801C141071460 @default.
• W2070105801 hasConceptScore W2070105801C164705383 @default.
• W2070105801 hasConceptScore W2070105801C2776820930 @default.
• W2070105801 hasConceptScore W2070105801C2779040412 @default.
• W2070105801 hasConceptScore W2070105801C2780069944 @default.
• W2070105801 hasConceptScore W2070105801C3017915907 @default.
• W2070105801 hasConceptScore W2070105801C71924100 @default.
• W2070105801 hasConceptScore W2070105801C8443397 @default.
• W2070105801 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W2070105801 hasLocation W20701058011 @default.
• W2070105801 hasLocation W20701058012 @default.
• W2070105801 hasOpenAccess W2070105801 @default.
• W2070105801 hasPrimaryLocation W20701058011 @default.
• W2070105801 hasRelatedWork W2011330618 @default.
• W2070105801 hasRelatedWork W2011832514 @default.
• W2070105801 hasRelatedWork W2012552911 @default.
• W2070105801 hasRelatedWork W2094642671 @default.
• W2070105801 hasRelatedWork W2156306048 @default.
• W2070105801 hasRelatedWork W2357277059 @default.
• W2070105801 hasRelatedWork W2378164257 @default.
• W2070105801 hasRelatedWork W2605932040 @default.
• W2070105801 hasRelatedWork W3029851491 @default.
• W2070105801 hasRelatedWork W2107923933 @default.
• W2070105801 hasVolume "7" @default.
• W2070105801 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2070105801 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2070105801 magId "2070105801" @default.
• W2070105801 workType "article" @default.