FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2070523474> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2070523474 abstract "Background: Competence-based curriculum has become the need of medical education to meet the objectives of institutions aiming to produce skilled physicians. To achieve the optimal competence and performance of graduates a number of traditional evaluation exercises have been practiced. Some of these e.g. OSCE although meet the acceptable standard of reliability and validity is the assessment done in a controlled environment. This leaves the room for performance-based assessment in real clinical situation such as mini clinical evaluation exercise (Mini-CEX). To practice and meet the challenges of Mini-CEX it is vital to undertake faculty development program with a comprehensively chalked down Mini-CEX protocol and its objectives to achieve the intended outcome. Objective: To undertake faculty development on Mini-CEX for its feasibility and acceptability as a method of formative assessment to evaluate the clinical competence of trainees in postgraduate program of Otolaryngology and Head-Neck Surgery. Method: 25 trainees from the four classes of master of surgery program of 2009 in Otolaryngology and Head-Neck Surgery (ORL-HNS) undertook Mini-CEX encounters and assessed by 9 supervisors in a 12-week period of study. Faculty development program was carried out through prior lectures deliberating on background, concept and procedure of Mini-CEX followed by demonstrations using video clip of Mini-CEX encounter recorded in own clinical environment. Students were also exposed to similar settings to take up the Mini-CEX encounter without any hesitation. Trainees were assessed in outpatient clinical setting. Program was evaluated for its feasibility and acceptability with respect to patient’s factors, clinical attributes, supervisor and trainee’s performance and their reported level of satisfaction. Result: Faculty development and trainees orientation in Min-CEX was achieved as feasible and acceptable. Higher rating of satisfaction was reported by majority assessors and trainees as they found Mini-CEX acceptable for formative assessment. Among clinical skills highest rating was received in physical examination and lowest rating in therapeutic skills. Conclusion: A motivated faculty and organized approach towards a comprehensive knowledge on Mini-CEX for its background communication, demonstration of procedure and method to complete the rating forms is the useful guide to adopt Mini-CEX. The faculty and trainees in department of ORL-HNS found Mini-CEX as feasible and acceptable assessment tool to monitor educational activity of postgraduate program through performance-based evaluation in a real clinical situation." @default.
• W2070523474 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2070523474 creator A5027968795 @default.
• W2070523474 date "2011-06-18" @default.
• W2070523474 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
• W2070523474 title "Faculty Development: Mini-CEX as Workplace-Based Assessment" @default.
• W2070523474 cites W1572626630 @default.
• W2070523474 cites W1973975145 @default.
• W2070523474 cites W1991876391 @default.
• W2070523474 cites W1994084271 @default.
• W2070523474 cites W2019155551 @default.
• W2070523474 cites W2037938207 @default.
• W2070523474 cites W2045687230 @default.
• W2070523474 cites W2075555314 @default.
• W2070523474 cites W2118672623 @default.
• W2070523474 cites W2130047516 @default.
• W2070523474 cites W2132892830 @default.
• W2070523474 cites W2144704232 @default.
• W2070523474 cites W2147881750 @default.
• W2070523474 cites W2148142446 @default.
• W2070523474 cites W2340232135 @default.
• W2070523474 cites W42607597 @default.
• W2070523474 doi "https://doi.org/10.5959/eimj.v3i1.88" @default.
• W2070523474 hasPublicationYear "2011" @default.
• W2070523474 type Work @default.
• W2070523474 sameAs 2070523474 @default.
• W2070523474 citedByCount "2" @default.
• W2070523474 countsByYear W20705234742014 @default.
• W2070523474 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2070523474 hasAuthorship W2070523474A5027968795 @default.
• W2070523474 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2070523474 hasConcept C509550671 @default.
• W2070523474 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2070523474 hasConceptScore W2070523474C15744967 @default.
• W2070523474 hasConceptScore W2070523474C509550671 @default.
• W2070523474 hasConceptScore W2070523474C71924100 @default.
• W2070523474 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W2070523474 hasLocation W20705234741 @default.
• W2070523474 hasOpenAccess W2070523474 @default.
• W2070523474 hasPrimaryLocation W20705234741 @default.
• W2070523474 hasRelatedWork W1710126152 @default.
• W2070523474 hasRelatedWork W2053487507 @default.
• W2070523474 hasRelatedWork W2077865380 @default.
• W2070523474 hasRelatedWork W2134894512 @default.
• W2070523474 hasRelatedWork W2138503431 @default.
• W2070523474 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
• W2070523474 hasRelatedWork W2765597752 @default.
• W2070523474 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
• W2070523474 hasRelatedWork W2931662336 @default.
• W2070523474 hasRelatedWork W3049356719 @default.
• W2070523474 hasVolume "3" @default.
• W2070523474 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2070523474 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2070523474 magId "2070523474" @default.
• W2070523474 workType "article" @default.