FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2071008846> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2071008846 endingPage "1831" @default.
• W2071008846 startingPage "1823" @default.
• W2071008846 abstract "Are earthquake source and propagation properties for in-slab earthquakes in the Cascadia region (British Columbia and Washington State) similar to those in the subduction zone of southwest Japan? To answer this question, we compare ground motions for two recent earthquakes of similar magnitude and depth. The comparisons are made for horizontal-component 5% damped response spectral acceleration at frequencies from 0.5 to 10 Hz. The selected Cascadia event is the Nisqually earthquake of 28 February 2001, which occurred within the subducting Juan de Fuca plate with a moment magnitude of M 6.8 at a depth of 51 km. The Japan event is the Geiyo earthquake of 24 March 2001 with M 6.8, at a depth of 60 km within the subducting Philippine Sea plate. Generally, the response spectral amplitudes from the two events overlay each other, when amplitudes are plotted against distance. An interesting relationship is observed however. At low frequencies (0.5-1 Hz) the Nisqually data tend to have higher amplitudes, whereas at high frequency (5-10 Hz) the Nisqually data have lower amplitudes, in comparison to the Geiyo data. The observed “drop through” of the Nisqually data relative to the Geiyo data as frequency increases could be due to either source effects or site effects. (It is not a path effect because there is no indication of differences in the slope of the attenuation curve.) If the observed frequency-dependent amplitude differences are due to source effects, this could imply that in-slab earthquakes in Japan are fundamentally different from those that occur in the Cascadia subduction zone. This would have important implications, as it would cast doubt on the applicability of lessons learned in Japan to hazard assessment in Cascadia. On the other hand, if the observed differences are attributable to site effects, then Japanese observations and results are applicable to Cascadia once we have accounted for differences in site effects. To address the origin of the observed differences in ground motion between the Nisqually and Geiyo earthquakes, we evaluate the influence of site effects on the recorded motions. We correct all response spectra to an equivalent rock motion, using amplifications derived from quarter-wavelength site response calculations for representative regional soil profiles. The site-corrected rock motions from Nisqually and Geiyo are in reasonable agreement with each other at all frequencies, with the exception of some Nisqually observations from West Seattle. We conclude that the observed differences between the Nisqually and Geiyo ground motions are attributable to regional differences in site response." @default.
• W2071008846 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2071008846 creator A5040811104 @default.
• W2071008846 date "2003-08-01" @default.
• W2071008846 modified "2023-10-09" @default.
• W2071008846 title "A Comparison of Ground Motions from the 2001 M 6.8 In-Slab Earthquakes in Cascadia and Japan" @default.
• W2071008846 cites W1487344631 @default.
• W2071008846 cites W1969052312 @default.
• W2071008846 cites W2002707883 @default.
• W2071008846 cites W2027831134 @default.
• W2071008846 cites W2062109374 @default.
• W2071008846 cites W2102817766 @default.
• W2071008846 cites W2103817435 @default.
• W2071008846 cites W2110114457 @default.
• W2071008846 cites W2145588834 @default.
• W2071008846 cites W2165281430 @default.
• W2071008846 cites W2982059467 @default.
• W2071008846 doi "https://doi.org/10.1785/0120020237" @default.
• W2071008846 hasPublicationYear "2003" @default.
• W2071008846 type Work @default.
• W2071008846 sameAs 2071008846 @default.
• W2071008846 citedByCount "19" @default.
• W2071008846 countsByYear W20710088462012 @default.
• W2071008846 countsByYear W20710088462013 @default.
• W2071008846 countsByYear W20710088462014 @default.
• W2071008846 countsByYear W20710088462015 @default.
• W2071008846 countsByYear W20710088462016 @default.
• W2071008846 countsByYear W20710088462018 @default.
• W2071008846 countsByYear W20710088462020 @default.
• W2071008846 countsByYear W20710088462023 @default.
• W2071008846 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2071008846 hasAuthorship W2071008846A5040811104 @default.
• W2071008846 hasConcept C113740112 @default.
• W2071008846 hasConcept C127313418 @default.
• W2071008846 hasConcept C165205528 @default.
• W2071008846 hasConcept C8058405 @default.
• W2071008846 hasConceptScore W2071008846C113740112 @default.
• W2071008846 hasConceptScore W2071008846C127313418 @default.
• W2071008846 hasConceptScore W2071008846C165205528 @default.
• W2071008846 hasConceptScore W2071008846C8058405 @default.
• W2071008846 hasIssue "4" @default.
• W2071008846 hasLocation W20710088461 @default.
• W2071008846 hasOpenAccess W2071008846 @default.
• W2071008846 hasPrimaryLocation W20710088461 @default.
• W2071008846 hasRelatedWork W2029251104 @default.
• W2071008846 hasRelatedWork W2262824164 @default.
• W2071008846 hasRelatedWork W2349064774 @default.
• W2071008846 hasRelatedWork W2352380072 @default.
• W2071008846 hasRelatedWork W2370986896 @default.
• W2071008846 hasRelatedWork W2381438901 @default.
• W2071008846 hasRelatedWork W2383095243 @default.
• W2071008846 hasRelatedWork W2515467626 @default.
• W2071008846 hasRelatedWork W2528697634 @default.
• W2071008846 hasRelatedWork W2978746926 @default.
• W2071008846 hasVolume "93" @default.
• W2071008846 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2071008846 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2071008846 magId "2071008846" @default.
• W2071008846 workType "article" @default.