FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2071126667> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2071126667 endingPage "547" @default.
• W2071126667 startingPage "546" @default.
• W2071126667 abstract "Reviewed by: Conserving the Enlightenment: French Military Engineering from Vauban to the Revolution John A. Lynn Conserving the Enlightenment: French Military Engineering from Vauban to the Revolution. By Janis Langins. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 2004. ISBN 0-262-12258-8. Illustrations. Notes. Bibliography. Index. Pp. xiv, 532. $55.00. This volume is primarily a history of engineering by a specialist in that field. Military historians will feel a bit out of place at times, for example during Langins's discussion of descriptive geometry. On broader issues, she draws interesting distinctions between artillerist engineers and fortifications engineers. She considers the question as to whether scientific engineering relied primarily on mathematics or experience during the Enlightenment. And above all, Langins reveals the conservative nature of military engineers as a body. Given the state of the historiography, this may be her most important contribution, for she contradicts certain fundamental arguments advanced by Ken Alder, who she praises. Alder claims that engineering was a quintessential revolutionary activity that denies history [Alder, Engineering the Revolution: Arms and Enlightenment in France, 1763-1815 (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1997), 15] and that engineers played a crucial role in shaping the French Revolution. As in her title, Langins [End Page 546] stresses the concept of conserving in several senses. Her main insight into the Enlightenment would seem to be this conservative side of men of science. As a work of military history, the book suffers from limitations but ultimately provides novel and interesting information. The chapters describing the evolution and functions of fortresses from the Renaissance through the reign of Louis XIV provide useful background for readers unversed in this subject, but add nothing new. The bibliography reveals significant gaps; she makes no reference to any books by Jean Chagniot, Jean-Paul Bertaud, Guy Rowlands, and other notable historians. Apparently, she did not look at either my Giant of the Grand Siècle or Wars of Louis XIV, both of which would have been helpful to her. This lack of depth leads her to miss some important points. She portrays the great military engineer, Sébastien le Prestre de Vauban, as universally revered and unchallenged during the reign of Louis XIV; however, his influence and credit were disputed late in his career. In her discussion of Gribeauval's reforms, she also seems unaware of the artillery of nouvelle invention that prefigured Gribeauval's guns during the reign of Louis XIV. Neither does she understand the full range of functions of fortresses, missing their roles in resource mobilization, particularly through the imposition of contributions. She also jumbles together the improvised defensive lines of the War of the Spanish Succession with the permanent fortifications of the pré carré advocated by Vauban. Despite such shortcomings, the real heart of the book, her discussion of the running battle between Marc-René, marquis de Montalembert (1714- 1800) and the Corps of Military Engineers, is highly informative. Langins mines this debate to several purposes. She adds to our technical knowledge of fortress design by aptly explaining the genius and idiosyncrasy of Montalembert's proposals for fortification perpendiculaire, published in eleven volumes between 1776 and 1797. Langins contrasts the lone, innovative Montalembert with the traditionalist Corps of Military Engineers, demonstrating the native conservatism of this corporate body. To my mind, she overstates the contemporary importance of the debate when she insists that it ranks as a third crucial eighteenth-century military/technical controversy, alongside that between artillery conservatives and those who backed the Gribeauval system of cannon and that between proponents of infantry lines or columns. Nonetheless, Langins earns high credit for her admirable blow by blow account of Montalembert's varied arguments and the opposition to them. In short, this is a book for specialists, and as such it does yeoman service. It certainly is a valuable addition to my bookshelf. John A. Lynn University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Urbana, Illinois Copyright © 2005 Society for Military History" @default.
• W2071126667 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2071126667 creator A5062646445 @default.
• W2071126667 date "2005-01-01" @default.
• W2071126667 modified "2023-10-17" @default.
• W2071126667 title "Conserving the Enlightenment: French Military Engineering from Vauban to the Revolution (review)" @default.
• W2071126667 doi "https://doi.org/10.1353/jmh.2005.0113" @default.
• W2071126667 hasPublicationYear "2005" @default.
• W2071126667 type Work @default.
• W2071126667 sameAs 2071126667 @default.
• W2071126667 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2071126667 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2071126667 hasAuthorship W2071126667A5062646445 @default.
• W2071126667 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
• W2071126667 hasConcept C11413529 @default.
• W2071126667 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W2071126667 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W2071126667 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2071126667 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2071126667 hasConcept C2780326160 @default.
• W2071126667 hasConcept C29598333 @default.
• W2071126667 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2071126667 hasConcept C451841 @default.
• W2071126667 hasConcept C48103436 @default.
• W2071126667 hasConcept C541256628 @default.
• W2071126667 hasConcept C558475949 @default.
• W2071126667 hasConcept C74916050 @default.
• W2071126667 hasConcept C95457728 @default.
• W2071126667 hasConceptScore W2071126667C111472728 @default.
• W2071126667 hasConceptScore W2071126667C11413529 @default.
• W2071126667 hasConceptScore W2071126667C138885662 @default.
• W2071126667 hasConceptScore W2071126667C144024400 @default.
• W2071126667 hasConceptScore W2071126667C17744445 @default.
• W2071126667 hasConceptScore W2071126667C199539241 @default.
• W2071126667 hasConceptScore W2071126667C2780326160 @default.
• W2071126667 hasConceptScore W2071126667C29598333 @default.
• W2071126667 hasConceptScore W2071126667C41008148 @default.
• W2071126667 hasConceptScore W2071126667C451841 @default.
• W2071126667 hasConceptScore W2071126667C48103436 @default.
• W2071126667 hasConceptScore W2071126667C541256628 @default.
• W2071126667 hasConceptScore W2071126667C558475949 @default.
• W2071126667 hasConceptScore W2071126667C74916050 @default.
• W2071126667 hasConceptScore W2071126667C95457728 @default.
• W2071126667 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W2071126667 hasLocation W20711266671 @default.
• W2071126667 hasOpenAccess W2071126667 @default.
• W2071126667 hasPrimaryLocation W20711266671 @default.
• W2071126667 hasRelatedWork W2010981661 @default.
• W2071126667 hasRelatedWork W2084910460 @default.
• W2071126667 hasRelatedWork W2111354142 @default.
• W2071126667 hasRelatedWork W2172144143 @default.
• W2071126667 hasRelatedWork W2360131231 @default.
• W2071126667 hasRelatedWork W2481832292 @default.
• W2071126667 hasRelatedWork W2492578904 @default.
• W2071126667 hasRelatedWork W2589066049 @default.
• W2071126667 hasRelatedWork W2601313998 @default.
• W2071126667 hasRelatedWork W4299085373 @default.
• W2071126667 hasVolume "69" @default.
• W2071126667 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2071126667 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2071126667 magId "2071126667" @default.
• W2071126667 workType "article" @default.