FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2071228265> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2071228265 endingPage "197" @default.
• W2071228265 startingPage "192" @default.
• W2071228265 abstract "Background Whether the type of electrosurgical current used for endoscopic sphincterotomy influences the frequency of postsphincterotomy complications is unknown. Methods: One hundred eighty-six patients with choledocholithiasis were prospectively randomized to undergo endoscopic sphincterotomy with pure cutting current (n=62, Group A), blended current (n=62, Group B), or pure cutting initially followed by blended current (n=62, Group C). Serum concentrations of amylase and lipase were evaluated in all patients 12 and 24 hours after sphincterotomy. Clinical pancreatitis was classified as mild, moderate, or severe. Postsphincterotomy bleeding was defined as a decrease in hematocrit of greater than 5%. Results: Serum concentrations of amylase and lipase were greater in Groups B and C at 12 and 24 hours after the procedure, as compared with Group A. Clinical mild pancreatitis occurred in 2 patients in Group A (3.2%), 8 in Group B (12.9%), and in 8 in Group C (12.9%). The differences were statistically significant for Group A compared with either Group B or Group C (p=0.048). Postsphincterotomy bleeding occurred in 3 patients (1.6%), one in each group. Conclusion: The use of pure cutting electrosurgical current during endoscopic sphincterotomy in patients with choledocholithiasis is associated with a lesser degree of pancreatic enzyme elevation and lower frequency of pancreatitis, whereas bleeding is not increased compared with blended current. Changing from pure cutting to blended current after the first 3 to 5 mm of the incision is associated with an increased rate of complications compared to the use of pure cutting current for the entire sphincterotomy. (Gastrointest Endosc 2003;57:192–7.) Background Whether the type of electrosurgical current used for endoscopic sphincterotomy influences the frequency of postsphincterotomy complications is unknown. Methods: One hundred eighty-six patients with choledocholithiasis were prospectively randomized to undergo endoscopic sphincterotomy with pure cutting current (n=62, Group A), blended current (n=62, Group B), or pure cutting initially followed by blended current (n=62, Group C). Serum concentrations of amylase and lipase were evaluated in all patients 12 and 24 hours after sphincterotomy. Clinical pancreatitis was classified as mild, moderate, or severe. Postsphincterotomy bleeding was defined as a decrease in hematocrit of greater than 5%. Results: Serum concentrations of amylase and lipase were greater in Groups B and C at 12 and 24 hours after the procedure, as compared with Group A. Clinical mild pancreatitis occurred in 2 patients in Group A (3.2%), 8 in Group B (12.9%), and in 8 in Group C (12.9%). The differences were statistically significant for Group A compared with either Group B or Group C (p=0.048). Postsphincterotomy bleeding occurred in 3 patients (1.6%), one in each group. Conclusion: The use of pure cutting electrosurgical current during endoscopic sphincterotomy in patients with choledocholithiasis is associated with a lesser degree of pancreatic enzyme elevation and lower frequency of pancreatitis, whereas bleeding is not increased compared with blended current. Changing from pure cutting to blended current after the first 3 to 5 mm of the incision is associated with an increased rate of complications compared to the use of pure cutting current for the entire sphincterotomy. (Gastrointest Endosc 2003;57:192–7.)" @default.
• W2071228265 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2071228265 creator A5021790064 @default.
• W2071228265 creator A5028690425 @default.
• W2071228265 creator A5040678332 @default.
• W2071228265 creator A5055033963 @default.
• W2071228265 creator A5060186899 @default.
• W2071228265 creator A5068433446 @default.
• W2071228265 creator A5087791098 @default.
• W2071228265 creator A5088308417 @default.
• W2071228265 date "2003-02-01" @default.
• W2071228265 modified "2023-10-03" @default.
• W2071228265 title "A comparative study of postendoscopic sphincterotomy complications with various types of electrosurgical current in patients with choledocholithiasis" @default.
• W2071228265 cites W1996234263 @default.
• W2071228265 cites W2025986194 @default.
• W2071228265 cites W2034378499 @default.
• W2071228265 cites W2036448952 @default.
• W2071228265 cites W2043813971 @default.
• W2071228265 cites W2045382808 @default.
• W2071228265 cites W2049754380 @default.
• W2071228265 cites W2064153247 @default.
• W2071228265 cites W2071077034 @default.
• W2071228265 cites W2092413051 @default.
• W2071228265 cites W2102305215 @default.
• W2071228265 cites W2320210611 @default.
• W2071228265 cites W3164468 @default.
• W2071228265 doi "https://doi.org/10.1067/mge.2003.61" @default.
• W2071228265 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12556783" @default.
• W2071228265 hasPublicationYear "2003" @default.
• W2071228265 type Work @default.
• W2071228265 sameAs 2071228265 @default.
• W2071228265 citedByCount "57" @default.
• W2071228265 countsByYear W20712282652012 @default.
• W2071228265 countsByYear W20712282652013 @default.
• W2071228265 countsByYear W20712282652014 @default.
• W2071228265 countsByYear W20712282652015 @default.
• W2071228265 countsByYear W20712282652016 @default.
• W2071228265 countsByYear W20712282652017 @default.
• W2071228265 countsByYear W20712282652019 @default.
• W2071228265 countsByYear W20712282652020 @default.
• W2071228265 countsByYear W20712282652021 @default.
• W2071228265 countsByYear W20712282652022 @default.
• W2071228265 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2071228265 hasAuthorship W2071228265A5021790064 @default.
• W2071228265 hasAuthorship W2071228265A5028690425 @default.
• W2071228265 hasAuthorship W2071228265A5040678332 @default.
• W2071228265 hasAuthorship W2071228265A5055033963 @default.
• W2071228265 hasAuthorship W2071228265A5060186899 @default.
• W2071228265 hasAuthorship W2071228265A5068433446 @default.
• W2071228265 hasAuthorship W2071228265A5087791098 @default.
• W2071228265 hasAuthorship W2071228265A5088308417 @default.
• W2071228265 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2071228265 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2071228265 hasConcept C2775967933 @default.
• W2071228265 hasConcept C2777785397 @default.
• W2071228265 hasConcept C2780678043 @default.
• W2071228265 hasConcept C2780959883 @default.
• W2071228265 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2071228265 hasConcept C90924648 @default.
• W2071228265 hasConceptScore W2071228265C126322002 @default.
• W2071228265 hasConceptScore W2071228265C141071460 @default.
• W2071228265 hasConceptScore W2071228265C2775967933 @default.
• W2071228265 hasConceptScore W2071228265C2777785397 @default.
• W2071228265 hasConceptScore W2071228265C2780678043 @default.
• W2071228265 hasConceptScore W2071228265C2780959883 @default.
• W2071228265 hasConceptScore W2071228265C71924100 @default.
• W2071228265 hasConceptScore W2071228265C90924648 @default.
• W2071228265 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W2071228265 hasLocation W20712282651 @default.
• W2071228265 hasLocation W20712282652 @default.
• W2071228265 hasOpenAccess W2071228265 @default.
• W2071228265 hasPrimaryLocation W20712282651 @default.
• W2071228265 hasRelatedWork W2008878688 @default.
• W2071228265 hasRelatedWork W2025966179 @default.
• W2071228265 hasRelatedWork W2028258071 @default.
• W2071228265 hasRelatedWork W2348392966 @default.
• W2071228265 hasRelatedWork W2358350796 @default.
• W2071228265 hasRelatedWork W2365097036 @default.
• W2071228265 hasRelatedWork W2366146800 @default.
• W2071228265 hasRelatedWork W2382704688 @default.
• W2071228265 hasRelatedWork W2393255873 @default.
• W2071228265 hasRelatedWork W3206028959 @default.
• W2071228265 hasVolume "57" @default.
• W2071228265 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2071228265 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2071228265 magId "2071228265" @default.
• W2071228265 workType "article" @default.