FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2071304878> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2071304878 endingPage "1277" @default.
• W2071304878 startingPage "1271" @default.
• W2071304878 abstract "Purpose To determine the agreement between peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness measurements from Stratus time domain optical coherence tomography (OCT) and Cirrus spectral domain OCT (Carl Zeiss Meditec, Dublin, CA) in normal subjects and subjects with glaucoma. Design Evaluation of diagnostic test or technology. Participants A total of 130 eyes from 130 normal subjects and subjects with glaucoma were analyzed. The subjects were divided into groups by visual field criteria: normal (n = 29), glaucoma suspect (n = 12), mild glaucoma (n = 41), moderate glaucoma (n = 18), and severe glaucoma (n = 30). Methods Peripapillary RNFL thickness was measured with Stratus Fast RNFL and Cirrus 200×200 Optic Disc Scan on the same day in 1 eye of each subject to determine agreement. Two operators used the same instruments for all scans. Main Outcome Measures Student paired t testing, Pearson's correlation coefficient, and Bland-Altman analysis of RNFL thickness measurements. Results The average age of the glaucoma group was significantly more than that of the normal group: 68.3±12.3 years versus 55.7±12.1 years, respectively. For Stratus OCT, the average RNFL thickness (mean ± standard deviation) was 99.4±13.2 μm, 94.5±15.0 μm, 79.0±14.5 μm, 62.7±10.2 μm, and 51.0±8.9 μm for the normal, suspect, mild, moderate, and severe groups, respectively. For Cirrus OCT, the corresponding measurements were 92.0±10.8 μm, 88.1±13.5 μm, 73.3±11.8 μm, 60.9±8.3 μm, and 55.3±6.6 μm. All Stratus-Cirrus differences were statistically significant by paired t testing (P<0.001) except for the moderate group (P = 0.11). For average RNFL, there was also a highly significant linear relationship between Stratus minus Cirrus difference and RNFL thickness (P<0.001). Bland-Altman plots showed that the systematic difference of Stratus measurements are smaller than Cirrus at thinner RNFL values but larger at thicker RNFL values. Conclusions RNFL thickness measurements between Stratus OCT and Cirrus OCT cannot be directly compared. Clinicians should be aware that measurements are generally higher with Stratus than with Cirrus except when the RNFL is very thin, as in severe glaucoma. This difference must be taken into account if comparing Stratus measurements with Cirrus measurements. Financial Disclosure(s) Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references. To determine the agreement between peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness measurements from Stratus time domain optical coherence tomography (OCT) and Cirrus spectral domain OCT (Carl Zeiss Meditec, Dublin, CA) in normal subjects and subjects with glaucoma. Evaluation of diagnostic test or technology. A total of 130 eyes from 130 normal subjects and subjects with glaucoma were analyzed. The subjects were divided into groups by visual field criteria: normal (n = 29), glaucoma suspect (n = 12), mild glaucoma (n = 41), moderate glaucoma (n = 18), and severe glaucoma (n = 30). Peripapillary RNFL thickness was measured with Stratus Fast RNFL and Cirrus 200×200 Optic Disc Scan on the same day in 1 eye of each subject to determine agreement. Two operators used the same instruments for all scans. Student paired t testing, Pearson's correlation coefficient, and Bland-Altman analysis of RNFL thickness measurements. The average age of the glaucoma group was significantly more than that of the normal group: 68.3±12.3 years versus 55.7±12.1 years, respectively. For Stratus OCT, the average RNFL thickness (mean ± standard deviation) was 99.4±13.2 μm, 94.5±15.0 μm, 79.0±14.5 μm, 62.7±10.2 μm, and 51.0±8.9 μm for the normal, suspect, mild, moderate, and severe groups, respectively. For Cirrus OCT, the corresponding measurements were 92.0±10.8 μm, 88.1±13.5 μm, 73.3±11.8 μm, 60.9±8.3 μm, and 55.3±6.6 μm. All Stratus-Cirrus differences were statistically significant by paired t testing (P<0.001) except for the moderate group (P = 0.11). For average RNFL, there was also a highly significant linear relationship between Stratus minus Cirrus difference and RNFL thickness (P<0.001). Bland-Altman plots showed that the systematic difference of Stratus measurements are smaller than Cirrus at thinner RNFL values but larger at thicker RNFL values. RNFL thickness measurements between Stratus OCT and Cirrus OCT cannot be directly compared. Clinicians should be aware that measurements are generally higher with Stratus than with Cirrus except when the RNFL is very thin, as in severe glaucoma. This difference must be taken into account if comparing Stratus measurements with Cirrus measurements." @default.
• W2071304878 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2071304878 creator A5002558627 @default.
• W2071304878 creator A5006087398 @default.
• W2071304878 creator A5057271336 @default.
• W2071304878 creator A5072420087 @default.
• W2071304878 date "2009-07-01" @default.
• W2071304878 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
• W2071304878 title "Comparison of Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Measurements Using Time Domain and Spectral Domain Optical Coherent Tomography" @default.
• W2071304878 cites W1969028027 @default.
• W2071304878 cites W1969790819 @default.
• W2071304878 cites W1983859476 @default.
• W2071304878 cites W1994187238 @default.
• W2071304878 cites W2000806360 @default.
• W2071304878 cites W2002202844 @default.
• W2071304878 cites W2017209995 @default.
• W2071304878 cites W2035696983 @default.
• W2071304878 cites W2043777090 @default.
• W2071304878 cites W2052153819 @default.
• W2071304878 cites W2056111978 @default.
• W2071304878 cites W2062991617 @default.
• W2071304878 cites W2076673551 @default.
• W2071304878 cites W2085232786 @default.
• W2071304878 cites W2102640376 @default.
• W2071304878 cites W2126236141 @default.
• W2071304878 cites W2418802570 @default.
• W2071304878 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2008.12.032" @default.
• W2071304878 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/2713355" @default.
• W2071304878 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19395086" @default.
• W2071304878 hasPublicationYear "2009" @default.
• W2071304878 type Work @default.
• W2071304878 sameAs 2071304878 @default.
• W2071304878 citedByCount "185" @default.
• W2071304878 countsByYear W20713048782012 @default.
• W2071304878 countsByYear W20713048782013 @default.
• W2071304878 countsByYear W20713048782014 @default.
• W2071304878 countsByYear W20713048782015 @default.
• W2071304878 countsByYear W20713048782016 @default.
• W2071304878 countsByYear W20713048782017 @default.
• W2071304878 countsByYear W20713048782018 @default.
• W2071304878 countsByYear W20713048782019 @default.
• W2071304878 countsByYear W20713048782020 @default.
• W2071304878 countsByYear W20713048782021 @default.
• W2071304878 countsByYear W20713048782022 @default.
• W2071304878 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2071304878 hasAuthorship W2071304878A5002558627 @default.
• W2071304878 hasAuthorship W2071304878A5006087398 @default.
• W2071304878 hasAuthorship W2071304878A5057271336 @default.
• W2071304878 hasAuthorship W2071304878A5072420087 @default.
• W2071304878 hasBestOaLocation W20713048782 @default.
• W2071304878 hasConcept C118487528 @default.
• W2071304878 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W2071304878 hasConcept C153294291 @default.
• W2071304878 hasConcept C2776058522 @default.
• W2071304878 hasConcept C2778527774 @default.
• W2071304878 hasConcept C2778818243 @default.
• W2071304878 hasConcept C2779735895 @default.
• W2071304878 hasConcept C2780592520 @default.
• W2071304878 hasConcept C2780827179 @default.
• W2071304878 hasConcept C2781448682 @default.
• W2071304878 hasConcept C2910804505 @default.
• W2071304878 hasConcept C2983497740 @default.
• W2071304878 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2071304878 hasConceptScore W2071304878C118487528 @default.
• W2071304878 hasConceptScore W2071304878C121332964 @default.
• W2071304878 hasConceptScore W2071304878C153294291 @default.
• W2071304878 hasConceptScore W2071304878C2776058522 @default.
• W2071304878 hasConceptScore W2071304878C2778527774 @default.
• W2071304878 hasConceptScore W2071304878C2778818243 @default.
• W2071304878 hasConceptScore W2071304878C2779735895 @default.
• W2071304878 hasConceptScore W2071304878C2780592520 @default.
• W2071304878 hasConceptScore W2071304878C2780827179 @default.
• W2071304878 hasConceptScore W2071304878C2781448682 @default.
• W2071304878 hasConceptScore W2071304878C2910804505 @default.
• W2071304878 hasConceptScore W2071304878C2983497740 @default.
• W2071304878 hasConceptScore W2071304878C71924100 @default.
• W2071304878 hasIssue "7" @default.
• W2071304878 hasLocation W20713048781 @default.
• W2071304878 hasLocation W20713048782 @default.
• W2071304878 hasLocation W20713048783 @default.
• W2071304878 hasLocation W20713048784 @default.
• W2071304878 hasOpenAccess W2071304878 @default.
• W2071304878 hasPrimaryLocation W20713048781 @default.
• W2071304878 hasRelatedWork W1981900389 @default.
• W2071304878 hasRelatedWork W2010788813 @default.
• W2071304878 hasRelatedWork W2061322523 @default.
• W2071304878 hasRelatedWork W2084027315 @default.
• W2071304878 hasRelatedWork W2086126450 @default.
• W2071304878 hasRelatedWork W2170858921 @default.
• W2071304878 hasRelatedWork W2501232351 @default.
• W2071304878 hasRelatedWork W2582186280 @default.
• W2071304878 hasRelatedWork W3030369144 @default.
• W2071304878 hasRelatedWork W3113938851 @default.
• W2071304878 hasVolume "116" @default.
• W2071304878 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2071304878 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2071304878 magId "2071304878" @default.
• W2071304878 workType "article" @default.