FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2071490274> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2071490274 endingPage "1037" @default.
• W2071490274 startingPage "1031" @default.
• W2071490274 abstract "Purpose To determine the outcome of gastrostomy tube–to–gastrojejunostomy tube conversion on the basis of the method of original gastrostomy tube placement. Materials and Methods One hundred twenty-four patients (age range, 13–87 years; 72 male and 52 female patients) underwent conversion of a primarily placed gastrostomy tube to a gastrojejunostomy tube at the authors' institution between January 2000 and December 2008. The method of original gastrostomy tube placement was radiologic (n = 27), endoscopic (n = 75), laparoscopic (n = 2), or open surgery (n = 20). The method of placement was correlated with the success rates of gastrostomy-to-gastrojejunostomy tube conversion. Medical records and radiologic images were reviewed to determine the frequency of proximal migration of the jejunostomy tube into the stomach. Follow-up data were available for an average of 136 days after gastrostomy-to-gastrojejunostomy tube conversion (median, 63 days; range, 1–1,300 days). Results Of 124 gastrostomy tube–to–gastrojejunostomy tube conversions, 109 (87.9%) were successfully performed. Procedural conversion failure occurred in one of the 27 radiologically inserted gastrostomy tubes (3.7%) compared to 14 of the 97 (14%) nonradiologically inserted gastrostomy tubes (P = .19), of which 12 were inserted endoscopically and two were inserted surgically. Of the 109 patients with successful tube conversion, jejunal tip malposition occurred at follow-up in 18 (16.5%). Of these, four patients developed aspiration pneumonia (22%), which contributed to patient death in two. The frequency of jejunal tip malposition was 3.8% (one of 26 patients) for radiologically placed gastrostomy tubes and 20% (17 of 83 patients) for nonradiologically placed gastrostomy tubes (P = .07). Combined, 32% of gastrostomy tubes placed nonradiologically resulted in either procedural failure or eventual jejunal tip malposition, compared to 7.4% of radiologically placed gastrostomy tubes (P = .01). Conclusions The frequency of procedural failure or eventual jejunal tip malposition with conversion of radiologically placed gastrostomy tubes to gastrojejunostomy tubes is significantly lower with radiologically placed gastrostomy tubes than with nonradiologically inserted gastrostomy tubes. To determine the outcome of gastrostomy tube–to–gastrojejunostomy tube conversion on the basis of the method of original gastrostomy tube placement. One hundred twenty-four patients (age range, 13–87 years; 72 male and 52 female patients) underwent conversion of a primarily placed gastrostomy tube to a gastrojejunostomy tube at the authors' institution between January 2000 and December 2008. The method of original gastrostomy tube placement was radiologic (n = 27), endoscopic (n = 75), laparoscopic (n = 2), or open surgery (n = 20). The method of placement was correlated with the success rates of gastrostomy-to-gastrojejunostomy tube conversion. Medical records and radiologic images were reviewed to determine the frequency of proximal migration of the jejunostomy tube into the stomach. Follow-up data were available for an average of 136 days after gastrostomy-to-gastrojejunostomy tube conversion (median, 63 days; range, 1–1,300 days). Of 124 gastrostomy tube–to–gastrojejunostomy tube conversions, 109 (87.9%) were successfully performed. Procedural conversion failure occurred in one of the 27 radiologically inserted gastrostomy tubes (3.7%) compared to 14 of the 97 (14%) nonradiologically inserted gastrostomy tubes (P = .19), of which 12 were inserted endoscopically and two were inserted surgically. Of the 109 patients with successful tube conversion, jejunal tip malposition occurred at follow-up in 18 (16.5%). Of these, four patients developed aspiration pneumonia (22%), which contributed to patient death in two. The frequency of jejunal tip malposition was 3.8% (one of 26 patients) for radiologically placed gastrostomy tubes and 20% (17 of 83 patients) for nonradiologically placed gastrostomy tubes (P = .07). Combined, 32% of gastrostomy tubes placed nonradiologically resulted in either procedural failure or eventual jejunal tip malposition, compared to 7.4% of radiologically placed gastrostomy tubes (P = .01). The frequency of procedural failure or eventual jejunal tip malposition with conversion of radiologically placed gastrostomy tubes to gastrojejunostomy tubes is significantly lower with radiologically placed gastrostomy tubes than with nonradiologically inserted gastrostomy tubes." @default.
• W2071490274 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2071490274 creator A5009306509 @default.
• W2071490274 creator A5018571955 @default.
• W2071490274 creator A5041229626 @default.
• W2071490274 creator A5070559235 @default.
• W2071490274 creator A5076374754 @default.
• W2071490274 creator A5083059709 @default.
• W2071490274 date "2010-07-01" @default.
• W2071490274 modified "2023-10-17" @default.
• W2071490274 title "Gastrostomy-to-gastrojejunostomy Tube Conversion: Impact of the Method of Original Gastrostomy Tube Placement" @default.
• W2071490274 cites W1968271922 @default.
• W2071490274 cites W1968505534 @default.
• W2071490274 cites W1987708213 @default.
• W2071490274 cites W1989726269 @default.
• W2071490274 cites W1992787799 @default.
• W2071490274 cites W1993226137 @default.
• W2071490274 cites W2038687292 @default.
• W2071490274 cites W2044286990 @default.
• W2071490274 cites W2051760593 @default.
• W2071490274 cites W2058118072 @default.
• W2071490274 cites W2102619297 @default.
• W2071490274 cites W2109819743 @default.
• W2071490274 cites W2138819737 @default.
• W2071490274 cites W2150770734 @default.
• W2071490274 cites W2426091728 @default.
• W2071490274 cites W2761144577 @default.
• W2071490274 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvir.2010.04.003" @default.
• W2071490274 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20538477" @default.
• W2071490274 hasPublicationYear "2010" @default.
• W2071490274 type Work @default.
• W2071490274 sameAs 2071490274 @default.
• W2071490274 citedByCount "18" @default.
• W2071490274 countsByYear W20714902742013 @default.
• W2071490274 countsByYear W20714902742014 @default.
• W2071490274 countsByYear W20714902742015 @default.
• W2071490274 countsByYear W20714902742016 @default.
• W2071490274 countsByYear W20714902742017 @default.
• W2071490274 countsByYear W20714902742019 @default.
• W2071490274 countsByYear W20714902742020 @default.
• W2071490274 countsByYear W20714902742021 @default.
• W2071490274 countsByYear W20714902742022 @default.
• W2071490274 countsByYear W20714902742023 @default.
• W2071490274 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2071490274 hasAuthorship W2071490274A5009306509 @default.
• W2071490274 hasAuthorship W2071490274A5018571955 @default.
• W2071490274 hasAuthorship W2071490274A5041229626 @default.
• W2071490274 hasAuthorship W2071490274A5070559235 @default.
• W2071490274 hasAuthorship W2071490274A5076374754 @default.
• W2071490274 hasAuthorship W2071490274A5083059709 @default.
• W2071490274 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2071490274 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W2071490274 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2071490274 hasConcept C2777014482 @default.
• W2071490274 hasConcept C2777355116 @default.
• W2071490274 hasConcept C2777551473 @default.
• W2071490274 hasConcept C2777914695 @default.
• W2071490274 hasConcept C2778045676 @default.
• W2071490274 hasConcept C2781338923 @default.
• W2071490274 hasConcept C3017742122 @default.
• W2071490274 hasConcept C61434518 @default.
• W2071490274 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2071490274 hasConcept C78519656 @default.
• W2071490274 hasConcept C78722104 @default.
• W2071490274 hasConceptScore W2071490274C126322002 @default.
• W2071490274 hasConceptScore W2071490274C127413603 @default.
• W2071490274 hasConceptScore W2071490274C141071460 @default.
• W2071490274 hasConceptScore W2071490274C2777014482 @default.
• W2071490274 hasConceptScore W2071490274C2777355116 @default.
• W2071490274 hasConceptScore W2071490274C2777551473 @default.
• W2071490274 hasConceptScore W2071490274C2777914695 @default.
• W2071490274 hasConceptScore W2071490274C2778045676 @default.
• W2071490274 hasConceptScore W2071490274C2781338923 @default.
• W2071490274 hasConceptScore W2071490274C3017742122 @default.
• W2071490274 hasConceptScore W2071490274C61434518 @default.
• W2071490274 hasConceptScore W2071490274C71924100 @default.
• W2071490274 hasConceptScore W2071490274C78519656 @default.
• W2071490274 hasConceptScore W2071490274C78722104 @default.
• W2071490274 hasIssue "7" @default.
• W2071490274 hasLocation W20714902741 @default.
• W2071490274 hasLocation W20714902742 @default.
• W2071490274 hasOpenAccess W2071490274 @default.
• W2071490274 hasPrimaryLocation W20714902741 @default.
• W2071490274 hasRelatedWork W1986086201 @default.
• W2071490274 hasRelatedWork W2029184591 @default.
• W2071490274 hasRelatedWork W2800318707 @default.
• W2071490274 hasRelatedWork W2888331614 @default.
• W2071490274 hasRelatedWork W2979961318 @default.
• W2071490274 hasRelatedWork W3030172381 @default.
• W2071490274 hasRelatedWork W3141826310 @default.
• W2071490274 hasRelatedWork W3141964188 @default.
• W2071490274 hasRelatedWork W4249048524 @default.
• W2071490274 hasRelatedWork W4321172404 @default.
• W2071490274 hasVolume "21" @default.
• W2071490274 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2071490274 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2071490274 magId "2071490274" @default.
• W2071490274 workType "article" @default.