FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2071817677> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2071817677 endingPage "466" @default.
• W2071817677 startingPage "459" @default.
• W2071817677 abstract "It is not clear if good methodological quality in developing practice guidelines (GLs) necessarily leads to valid recommendations that, when implemented, are more likely to improve the balance between benefits and harms/costs. We assessed whether or not there is a link between methodological quality and recommendation validity in GLs for the use of fecal occult blood test (FOBT) as a screening test for colorectal cancer (CRC) in the average-risk population. We systematically searched for such practice GLs published in English or in French within the last 7 years. Our inclusion criteria limited the initial 36 GLs to 12. Scores for methodological quality based on the AGREE criteria were attributed to each of these 12 GLs. Likewise, we searched for meta-analysis and other systematic reviews (SRs) addressing the issue, and we selected for inclusion 8 SRs that met basic quality criteria according to the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) of the National Health Service of the United Kingdom (NHS). We used the results and conclusions of these 8 SRs to establish the validity of recommendations made in the 12 included GLs. Regarding methodological quality, the GLs were labeled either “strongly recommend” ( n = 3), “recommend with provisos or alterations ( n = 3), “would not recommend ( n = 2), or “unsure” ( n = 4). The nine GLs recommending for, as well as the three GLs recommending against, mass-screening are equally valid, because the former base their recommendation on the fact that this can decrease CRC-mortality, whereas the latter base their recommendation on the facts that: (1) this procedure would be too expensive and/or not adapted to their local organization of care, and (2) to a lesser extent, the balance between benefits and harms is not crystal-clear from an individual patient perspective. The fact that the 12 GLs fell short of basic quality criteria confirms many previous observations in various areas of medicine. Because the 12 GLs were found to be equally valid regarding their FOBT-related recommendations, no relation could be found between their methodological quality and their content validity." @default.
• W2071817677 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2071817677 creator A5022683883 @default.
• W2071817677 creator A5063272996 @default.
• W2071817677 date "2008-05-01" @default.
• W2071817677 modified "2023-09-25" @default.
• W2071817677 title "Mass colorectal cancer screening: Methodological quality of practice guidelines is not related to their content validity" @default.
• W2071817677 cites W1909311348 @default.
• W2071817677 cites W1973043309 @default.
• W2071817677 cites W1989874898 @default.
• W2071817677 cites W1996924139 @default.
• W2071817677 cites W2001775660 @default.
• W2071817677 cites W2009356814 @default.
• W2071817677 cites W2016896582 @default.
• W2071817677 cites W2019893869 @default.
• W2071817677 cites W2020757388 @default.
• W2071817677 cites W2027177473 @default.
• W2071817677 cites W2060042027 @default.
• W2071817677 cites W2072878220 @default.
• W2071817677 cites W2095757153 @default.
• W2071817677 cites W2097786984 @default.
• W2071817677 cites W2106952837 @default.
• W2071817677 cites W2108062870 @default.
• W2071817677 cites W2115048957 @default.
• W2071817677 cites W2117390352 @default.
• W2071817677 cites W2119839828 @default.
• W2071817677 cites W2120488811 @default.
• W2071817677 cites W2123589563 @default.
• W2071817677 cites W2129829737 @default.
• W2071817677 cites W2138363439 @default.
• W2071817677 cites W2149467064 @default.
• W2071817677 cites W2150798407 @default.
• W2071817677 cites W2160601449 @default.
• W2071817677 cites W2161920747 @default.
• W2071817677 cites W2328703052 @default.
• W2071817677 cites W2471590298 @default.
• W2071817677 cites W2746122474 @default.
• W2071817677 cites W2884209703 @default.
• W2071817677 cites W2953723060 @default.
• W2071817677 cites W2986772077 @default.
• W2071817677 cites W3108422974 @default.
• W2071817677 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2007.12.020" @default.
• W2071817677 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18226597" @default.
• W2071817677 hasPublicationYear "2008" @default.
• W2071817677 type Work @default.
• W2071817677 sameAs 2071817677 @default.
• W2071817677 citedByCount "19" @default.
• W2071817677 countsByYear W20718176772012 @default.
• W2071817677 countsByYear W20718176772013 @default.
• W2071817677 countsByYear W20718176772014 @default.
• W2071817677 countsByYear W20718176772016 @default.
• W2071817677 countsByYear W20718176772017 @default.
• W2071817677 countsByYear W20718176772019 @default.
• W2071817677 countsByYear W20718176772020 @default.
• W2071817677 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2071817677 hasAuthorship W2071817677A5022683883 @default.
• W2071817677 hasAuthorship W2071817677A5063272996 @default.
• W2071817677 hasConcept C109359841 @default.
• W2071817677 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
• W2071817677 hasConcept C121608353 @default.
• W2071817677 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2071817677 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W2071817677 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W2071817677 hasConcept C151730666 @default.
• W2071817677 hasConcept C152541439 @default.
• W2071817677 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2071817677 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2071817677 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2071817677 hasConcept C204787440 @default.
• W2071817677 hasConcept C2777267654 @default.
• W2071817677 hasConcept C2778435480 @default.
• W2071817677 hasConcept C2779158730 @default.
• W2071817677 hasConcept C2779473830 @default.
• W2071817677 hasConcept C2779530757 @default.
• W2071817677 hasConcept C2908647359 @default.
• W2071817677 hasConcept C512399662 @default.
• W2071817677 hasConcept C526805850 @default.
• W2071817677 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2071817677 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
• W2071817677 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2071817677 hasConcept C99454951 @default.
• W2071817677 hasConceptScore W2071817677C109359841 @default.
• W2071817677 hasConceptScore W2071817677C111472728 @default.
• W2071817677 hasConceptScore W2071817677C121608353 @default.
• W2071817677 hasConceptScore W2071817677C126322002 @default.
• W2071817677 hasConceptScore W2071817677C138885662 @default.
• W2071817677 hasConceptScore W2071817677C142724271 @default.
• W2071817677 hasConceptScore W2071817677C151730666 @default.
• W2071817677 hasConceptScore W2071817677C152541439 @default.
• W2071817677 hasConceptScore W2071817677C15744967 @default.
• W2071817677 hasConceptScore W2071817677C17744445 @default.
• W2071817677 hasConceptScore W2071817677C199539241 @default.
• W2071817677 hasConceptScore W2071817677C204787440 @default.
• W2071817677 hasConceptScore W2071817677C2777267654 @default.
• W2071817677 hasConceptScore W2071817677C2778435480 @default.
• W2071817677 hasConceptScore W2071817677C2779158730 @default.
• W2071817677 hasConceptScore W2071817677C2779473830 @default.
• W2071817677 hasConceptScore W2071817677C2779530757 @default.

• next