FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2071901907> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2071901907 endingPage "288" @default.
• W2071901907 startingPage "279" @default.
• W2071901907 abstract "Background: Although both anatomic double-bundle and single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction procedures are in use, it remains controversial whether the anatomic double-bundle procedure is biomechanically superior. Hypothesis: The anatomic double-bundle procedure would be better than both laterally placed anatomic and nonanatomic transtibial single-bundle procedures at restoring to normal the tibial anterior translation, internal rotation, and pivot-shift instability. It was also hypothesized that tibial internal rotation would be closer to normal after laterally placed anatomic single-bundle reconstruction than after the nonanatomic reconstruction. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: Eight cadaveric knees were mounted in a 6 degrees of freedom rig and tested using the following loading conditions: 90-N anterior and posterior tibial forces, 5-N·m internal and external tibial rotation torques, and a simulated pivot-shift test. Tibiofemoral kinematics during the flexion-extension cycle were recorded with an optical tracking system for (1) intact, (2) anterior cruciate ligament–deficient knee, (3) anatomic double-bundle reconstruction, (4) nonanatomic single-bundle reconstruction, and (5) laterally placed single-bundle reconstruction. Results: Rotational laxity with internal tibial torque and anterior laxity in the simulated pivot shift were significantly less in the double-bundle reconstruction and laterally placed single-bundle reconstruction compared with the nonanatomic single-bundle reconstruction. There were no significant differences between the 3 procedures when anterior and posterior tibial translation forces and external rotation torques were applied. In addition, there were no significant differences between the double-bundle reconstruction and laterally placed single-bundle reconstruction. Conclusion: The postoperative rotational and pivot-shift laxity after anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction was significantly better than that after nonanatomic single-bundle reconstruction. However, there were no significant differences between the double-bundle reconstruction and laterally placed single-bundle reconstruction. Clinical Relevance: This work suggests that a single-bundle reconstruction may be better able to control both knee laxity and pivot-shift instability if the femoral tunnel is moved to a more lateral position and that then the double-bundle reconstruction may not offer significant further advantages." @default.
• W2071901907 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2071901907 creator A5011056961 @default.
• W2071901907 creator A5031724178 @default.
• W2071901907 creator A5052930863 @default.
• W2071901907 creator A5060343018 @default.
• W2071901907 date "2011-01-14" @default.
• W2071901907 modified "2023-09-29" @default.
• W2071901907 title "Biomechanical Comparison of Anatomic Double-Bundle, Anatomic Single-Bundle, and Nonanatomic Single-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstructions" @default.
• W2071901907 cites W1524584804 @default.
• W2071901907 cites W1837373175 @default.
• W2071901907 cites W1913183380 @default.
• W2071901907 cites W1945520291 @default.
• W2071901907 cites W1953146122 @default.
• W2071901907 cites W1966956291 @default.
• W2071901907 cites W1971912981 @default.
• W2071901907 cites W1973523538 @default.
• W2071901907 cites W1979275594 @default.
• W2071901907 cites W1980189499 @default.
• W2071901907 cites W1982282724 @default.
• W2071901907 cites W1995678389 @default.
• W2071901907 cites W2000565725 @default.
• W2071901907 cites W2007851519 @default.
• W2071901907 cites W2018067917 @default.
• W2071901907 cites W2024327781 @default.
• W2071901907 cites W2024385423 @default.
• W2071901907 cites W2032705602 @default.
• W2071901907 cites W2039033323 @default.
• W2071901907 cites W2041126677 @default.
• W2071901907 cites W2043776778 @default.
• W2071901907 cites W2047908157 @default.
• W2071901907 cites W2054802294 @default.
• W2071901907 cites W2058314822 @default.
• W2071901907 cites W2063993024 @default.
• W2071901907 cites W2071207300 @default.
• W2071901907 cites W2077665080 @default.
• W2071901907 cites W2078401969 @default.
• W2071901907 cites W2078772261 @default.
• W2071901907 cites W2085703711 @default.
• W2071901907 cites W2086038263 @default.
• W2071901907 cites W2097216377 @default.
• W2071901907 cites W2102321320 @default.
• W2071901907 cites W2103570019 @default.
• W2071901907 cites W2108603217 @default.
• W2071901907 cites W2112877966 @default.
• W2071901907 cites W2117158455 @default.
• W2071901907 cites W2119702561 @default.
• W2071901907 cites W2128767796 @default.
• W2071901907 cites W2132384485 @default.
• W2071901907 cites W2133533026 @default.
• W2071901907 cites W2138100313 @default.
• W2071901907 cites W213962456 @default.
• W2071901907 cites W2149539028 @default.
• W2071901907 cites W2163635820 @default.
• W2071901907 cites W2168517677 @default.
• W2071901907 cites W2169147400 @default.
• W2071901907 cites W2169839983 @default.
• W2071901907 cites W2171108625 @default.
• W2071901907 cites W2194685141 @default.
• W2071901907 cites W2311677952 @default.
• W2071901907 cites W3164481590 @default.
• W2071901907 cites W4240768176 @default.
• W2071901907 cites W56391876 @default.
• W2071901907 cites W67429352 @default.
• W2071901907 doi "https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546510392350" @default.
• W2071901907 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21239692" @default.
• W2071901907 hasPublicationYear "2011" @default.
• W2071901907 type Work @default.
• W2071901907 sameAs 2071901907 @default.
• W2071901907 citedByCount "182" @default.
• W2071901907 countsByYear W20719019072012 @default.
• W2071901907 countsByYear W20719019072013 @default.
• W2071901907 countsByYear W20719019072014 @default.
• W2071901907 countsByYear W20719019072015 @default.
• W2071901907 countsByYear W20719019072016 @default.
• W2071901907 countsByYear W20719019072017 @default.
• W2071901907 countsByYear W20719019072018 @default.
• W2071901907 countsByYear W20719019072019 @default.
• W2071901907 countsByYear W20719019072020 @default.
• W2071901907 countsByYear W20719019072021 @default.
• W2071901907 countsByYear W20719019072022 @default.
• W2071901907 countsByYear W20719019072023 @default.
• W2071901907 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2071901907 hasAuthorship W2071901907A5011056961 @default.
• W2071901907 hasAuthorship W2071901907A5031724178 @default.
• W2071901907 hasAuthorship W2071901907A5052930863 @default.
• W2071901907 hasAuthorship W2071901907A5060343018 @default.
• W2071901907 hasConcept C105702510 @default.
• W2071901907 hasConcept C159985019 @default.
• W2071901907 hasConcept C175696284 @default.
• W2071901907 hasConcept C192562407 @default.
• W2071901907 hasConcept C2778134712 @default.
• W2071901907 hasConcept C2778434673 @default.
• W2071901907 hasConcept C2780887989 @default.
• W2071901907 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2071901907 hasConcept C91762617 @default.
• W2071901907 hasConceptScore W2071901907C105702510 @default.
• W2071901907 hasConceptScore W2071901907C159985019 @default.

• next