Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2071986425> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 78 of
78
with 100 items per page.
- W2071986425 endingPage "329" @default.
- W2071986425 startingPage "327" @default.
- W2071986425 abstract "Adenoidectomy is one of the oldest and most frequent ENT procedures. This study aimed to compare adenoidectomy using suction-cautery adenoidectomy (SCA) to curettage with respect to operative time, postoperative complications, and cost-effectiveness.The data for this retrospective case control study were retrieved from the Medical Records Department at one of the few medical centers that perform this technique in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. The data for each case included the following: patient demographic features, type of procedure, time of operation, occurrence of any postoperative complications, length of hospital stay and cost of the procedure. To minimize the sources of variance in our data, all adenoidectomies were performed by the same consultant otolaryngologist, using either SCA or curettage.Of the 86 patients who underwent adenoidectomy in this study, SCA was performed in half of them (43) and curettage in the other half. The two groups were well matched with no significant group differences in either age or gender (p=0.2 and p=0.19, respectively). There was a significant reduction in operative time (p<0.001) in the SCA group. There were no cases of postoperative hemorrhage after SCA, but there was one case of hemorrhage in the curette group that required a 2nd surgery to control the bleeding. Regarding cost, there were additional profits of more than 700,000 SR (US$180,000) each month with SCA as compared to curettage.The suction cautery technique was superior at reducing operative time, increasing cost-effectiveness and decreasing the risk of postoperative complications. Therefore, we suggest suction cautery as the most appropriate method for adenoidectomy." @default.
- W2071986425 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W2071986425 creator A5005036532 @default.
- W2071986425 creator A5041190937 @default.
- W2071986425 creator A5041707033 @default.
- W2071986425 creator A5081579723 @default.
- W2071986425 date "2011-03-01" @default.
- W2071986425 modified "2023-10-01" @default.
- W2071986425 title "Suction cautery adenoidectomy (SCA): Is the additional cost justified?" @default.
- W2071986425 cites W1995951348 @default.
- W2071986425 cites W1999420754 @default.
- W2071986425 cites W2004290495 @default.
- W2071986425 cites W2015909939 @default.
- W2071986425 cites W2018360963 @default.
- W2071986425 cites W2049065059 @default.
- W2071986425 cites W2089433694 @default.
- W2071986425 cites W2118861783 @default.
- W2071986425 cites W35171098 @default.
- W2071986425 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2010.11.020" @default.
- W2071986425 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21159387" @default.
- W2071986425 hasPublicationYear "2011" @default.
- W2071986425 type Work @default.
- W2071986425 sameAs 2071986425 @default.
- W2071986425 citedByCount "4" @default.
- W2071986425 countsByYear W20719864252014 @default.
- W2071986425 countsByYear W20719864252017 @default.
- W2071986425 countsByYear W20719864252022 @default.
- W2071986425 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2071986425 hasAuthorship W2071986425A5005036532 @default.
- W2071986425 hasAuthorship W2071986425A5041190937 @default.
- W2071986425 hasAuthorship W2071986425A5041707033 @default.
- W2071986425 hasAuthorship W2071986425A5081579723 @default.
- W2071986425 hasConcept C108516343 @default.
- W2071986425 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
- W2071986425 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
- W2071986425 hasConcept C23795335 @default.
- W2071986425 hasConcept C2776008533 @default.
- W2071986425 hasConcept C2777346780 @default.
- W2071986425 hasConcept C2777750650 @default.
- W2071986425 hasConcept C2779073326 @default.
- W2071986425 hasConcept C2779904257 @default.
- W2071986425 hasConcept C42219234 @default.
- W2071986425 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W2071986425 hasConcept C78519656 @default.
- W2071986425 hasConceptScore W2071986425C108516343 @default.
- W2071986425 hasConceptScore W2071986425C127413603 @default.
- W2071986425 hasConceptScore W2071986425C141071460 @default.
- W2071986425 hasConceptScore W2071986425C23795335 @default.
- W2071986425 hasConceptScore W2071986425C2776008533 @default.
- W2071986425 hasConceptScore W2071986425C2777346780 @default.
- W2071986425 hasConceptScore W2071986425C2777750650 @default.
- W2071986425 hasConceptScore W2071986425C2779073326 @default.
- W2071986425 hasConceptScore W2071986425C2779904257 @default.
- W2071986425 hasConceptScore W2071986425C42219234 @default.
- W2071986425 hasConceptScore W2071986425C71924100 @default.
- W2071986425 hasConceptScore W2071986425C78519656 @default.
- W2071986425 hasIssue "3" @default.
- W2071986425 hasLocation W20719864251 @default.
- W2071986425 hasLocation W20719864252 @default.
- W2071986425 hasOpenAccess W2071986425 @default.
- W2071986425 hasPrimaryLocation W20719864251 @default.
- W2071986425 hasRelatedWork W1962792472 @default.
- W2071986425 hasRelatedWork W1995951348 @default.
- W2071986425 hasRelatedWork W2019293533 @default.
- W2071986425 hasRelatedWork W2102818983 @default.
- W2071986425 hasRelatedWork W2188342593 @default.
- W2071986425 hasRelatedWork W2371581300 @default.
- W2071986425 hasRelatedWork W2384975796 @default.
- W2071986425 hasRelatedWork W2385315932 @default.
- W2071986425 hasRelatedWork W2788863200 @default.
- W2071986425 hasRelatedWork W2800672657 @default.
- W2071986425 hasVolume "75" @default.
- W2071986425 isParatext "false" @default.
- W2071986425 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W2071986425 magId "2071986425" @default.
- W2071986425 workType "article" @default.