FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2072192593> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2072192593 endingPage "58" @default.
• W2072192593 startingPage "55" @default.
• W2072192593 abstract "When being convicted for petty drug offence or driving under the influence of drugs in Sweden, the driving license may be suspended. To regain the license, the person has to prove that he or she has been drug free during an observation period. This is controlled by urine samples taken at several occasions. However, the risk of manipulation and the risk of false negative urine samples are high. In addition, many people find it difficult or embarrassing to urinate when observed. Hair sampling might therefore be a welcome option to this procedure, with its easy sampling and minimal risk of manipulation. The longer detection window may also provide better information to the physician. The aim of this work was to evaluate if clients preferred hair samples to urine and to investigate practical and interpretive problems or advantages with hair samples. Ninety-nine hair samples and 198 urine samples were collected from 84 clients during the 12 month study period. Hair samples were divided into either one segment (0-3 cm) or two segments (0-3 and 3-6 cm) depending on the length. The hair samples were screened with LC-MS-MS for 20 drugs and confirmation of positive results were performed with GC-MS or LC-MS-MS. The results were compared to urine samples taken at two occasions during the observation period. To cover the timeframe of the urine samples hair was collected 2 weeks after the second sample. The urine samples were analysed with immunochemical screening and positive results confirmed with GC-MS or LC-MS-MS. Seventy-four clients presented with negative results in both urine and hair. Hair analysis identified illegal drugs at seven different occasions whereas urine failed to identify any illegal drugs. However the thresholds used may still be too high to find sporadic use as clients that admitted to use drugs sporadically presented with drug concentrations lower than the agreed thresholds but above the limit of detection. This implicates that the physician must have an understanding and knowledge of the limitations of the screening methods used. Another important outcome was that the clients approved of hair sampling considering it a better means to prove their drug abstinence. In addition, both the clients and the clinicians thought hair sampling easier than urine sampling. We believe that hair analysis can offer several advantages compared to urine analysis for clinicians working with driving license regranting." @default.
• W2072192593 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2072192593 creator A5006119780 @default.
• W2072192593 creator A5029901397 @default.
• W2072192593 creator A5051066499 @default.
• W2072192593 creator A5062540952 @default.
• W2072192593 date "2010-03-01" @default.
• W2072192593 modified "2023-10-15" @default.
• W2072192593 title "Hair analysis for drugs in driver's license regranting. A Swedish pilot study" @default.
• W2072192593 cites W1967586502 @default.
• W2072192593 cites W1970306763 @default.
• W2072192593 cites W1972805770 @default.
• W2072192593 cites W1980766485 @default.
• W2072192593 cites W2056419530 @default.
• W2072192593 cites W2100566086 @default.
• W2072192593 cites W2103906445 @default.
• W2072192593 cites W2133920403 @default.
• W2072192593 cites W2142350299 @default.
• W2072192593 cites W2146322688 @default.
• W2072192593 cites W2165104770 @default.
• W2072192593 cites W2170567881 @default.
• W2072192593 cites W4251471829 @default.
• W2072192593 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2009.12.036" @default.
• W2072192593 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20060247" @default.
• W2072192593 hasPublicationYear "2010" @default.
• W2072192593 type Work @default.
• W2072192593 sameAs 2072192593 @default.
• W2072192593 citedByCount "35" @default.
• W2072192593 countsByYear W20721925932012 @default.
• W2072192593 countsByYear W20721925932013 @default.
• W2072192593 countsByYear W20721925932014 @default.
• W2072192593 countsByYear W20721925932015 @default.
• W2072192593 countsByYear W20721925932016 @default.
• W2072192593 countsByYear W20721925932017 @default.
• W2072192593 countsByYear W20721925932018 @default.
• W2072192593 countsByYear W20721925932019 @default.
• W2072192593 countsByYear W20721925932020 @default.
• W2072192593 countsByYear W20721925932021 @default.
• W2072192593 countsByYear W20721925932023 @default.
• W2072192593 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2072192593 hasAuthorship W2072192593A5006119780 @default.
• W2072192593 hasAuthorship W2072192593A5029901397 @default.
• W2072192593 hasAuthorship W2072192593A5051066499 @default.
• W2072192593 hasAuthorship W2072192593A5062540952 @default.
• W2072192593 hasConcept C106131492 @default.
• W2072192593 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2072192593 hasConcept C140779682 @default.
• W2072192593 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W2072192593 hasConcept C204787440 @default.
• W2072192593 hasConcept C2780026642 @default.
• W2072192593 hasConcept C2781400828 @default.
• W2072192593 hasConcept C2911165735 @default.
• W2072192593 hasConcept C3018197256 @default.
• W2072192593 hasConcept C31972630 @default.
• W2072192593 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2072192593 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2072192593 hasConceptScore W2072192593C106131492 @default.
• W2072192593 hasConceptScore W2072192593C126322002 @default.
• W2072192593 hasConceptScore W2072192593C140779682 @default.
• W2072192593 hasConceptScore W2072192593C142724271 @default.
• W2072192593 hasConceptScore W2072192593C204787440 @default.
• W2072192593 hasConceptScore W2072192593C2780026642 @default.
• W2072192593 hasConceptScore W2072192593C2781400828 @default.
• W2072192593 hasConceptScore W2072192593C2911165735 @default.
• W2072192593 hasConceptScore W2072192593C3018197256 @default.
• W2072192593 hasConceptScore W2072192593C31972630 @default.
• W2072192593 hasConceptScore W2072192593C41008148 @default.
• W2072192593 hasConceptScore W2072192593C71924100 @default.
• W2072192593 hasIssue "1-3" @default.
• W2072192593 hasLocation W20721925931 @default.
• W2072192593 hasLocation W20721925932 @default.
• W2072192593 hasOpenAccess W2072192593 @default.
• W2072192593 hasPrimaryLocation W20721925931 @default.
• W2072192593 hasRelatedWork W2000168451 @default.
• W2072192593 hasRelatedWork W2025693178 @default.
• W2072192593 hasRelatedWork W2393618306 @default.
• W2072192593 hasRelatedWork W2968945962 @default.
• W2072192593 hasRelatedWork W3029526812 @default.
• W2072192593 hasRelatedWork W3031211408 @default.
• W2072192593 hasRelatedWork W3036390192 @default.
• W2072192593 hasRelatedWork W3162218445 @default.
• W2072192593 hasRelatedWork W3165347638 @default.
• W2072192593 hasRelatedWork W31952242 @default.
• W2072192593 hasVolume "196" @default.
• W2072192593 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2072192593 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2072192593 magId "2072192593" @default.
• W2072192593 workType "article" @default.