Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2072233983> ?p ?o ?g. }
- W2072233983 endingPage "826" @default.
- W2072233983 startingPage "805" @default.
- W2072233983 abstract "Irish Aestheticism in Fin-de-Siècle Women’s Writing:Art, Realism, and the Nation Alison Harvey (bio) Much has been written on aestheticism as a European and English movement, whether in regard to the advocacy of l’art pour l’art by French writers such as Théophile Gautier or the espousal of antididactic “art for art’s sake” in the early works of Algernon Charles Swinburne and Walter Pater. But few scholars have turned their attention to the critical relations between aestheticism and Ireland, despite the prevalence of Irish authors in the formative moments of “British” aestheticism. Dennis Denisoff, for example, notes importantly that “two of the most influential contributors to the decadent phase of aestheticism were the Anglo-Irish George Moore and Oscar Wilde.”1 Yet he says nothing more about their Irishness or its potential significance to their decadent or aesthetic representations, turning instead to the influences on Moore and Wilde of the writings of Gautier, Baudelaire, Huysmans, and Pater (all of whose specifically French and English contexts also pass without comment). Richard Begam and Michael Valdez view Wilde’s Irishness as significant only in its absence or even eradication from his aestheticism, asserting that Wilde’s aestheticism “dared not speak its Irishness”—as if to suggest that Wilde’s national identity was as taboo as his sexuality.2 In contrast to these readings, recent work by Joseph Bristow, Declan Kiberd, and Jerusha McCormack situates Wilde’s Irishness firmly within the analytical frame, positing that Wilde’s Irishness in exile is itself central to his antimoralistic critique and subversion of English conventions in his works and life.3 As a colonial figure in the metropole, Wilde has an outsider’s point of view on Englishness that informs his aestheticist critique of key [End Page 805] Victorian forms and ideals. His focus on beautiful surfaces questions mimetic realism, and he challenges Victorian realist emphases on authenticity and sincerity, by asserting, in the words of his character Vivian, that “as a method, Realism is complete failure” and that “lying, the telling of beautiful untrue things, is the proper aim of art.”4 At the same time, Wilde’s aestheticism also satirizes the frivolity and exclusions of English upper-crust society, as his depictions of decadent English culture carefully expose its mannerisms as all surface, all mask, all shallowness and no depth. Wilde’s critiques of Englishness from his exilic or “nomadic” position within and against English culture thus constitute one compelling form of Irish aestheticism.5 But I am also interested in how the undertheorized phenomenon of Irish aestheticism appears in works that focus on Ireland itself during the turbulent fin-de-siècle period of decolonization, when the nation was undergoing political, social, economic, and cultural revolutions leading up to independence in 1921. One such form of Irish aestheticism emerges in the critically neglected fictions of coauthors Edith Somerville and Martin Ross, Emily Lawless, and Katherine Cecil Thurston, whose works stand in marked contrast to Wilde’s exilic aestheticism and its central focus on the cultural limitations of English society. These writers’ engagements with debates about art, beauty, and ugliness that preoccupy the tradition of l’art pour l’art also differ importantly from another manifestation of aestheticism in Ireland in works associated with the Irish revival. Revival writers including W. B. Yeats, Augusta Gregory, and J. M. Synge fused aestheticist modes—symbolism, myth, legend, allegory, and dream, among others—with nationalist politics as part of a project of forging and fostering a sovereign Irish identity and nation-to-be. Writing mainly in verse and drama rather than in prose or the novel form, revivalist authors emphasize Celtic and Gaelic myth and legend over contemporary Irish life, an emphasis that aligns their works formally with central aspects of British aestheticism while also differentiating them nationally from British imperialist depictions of Ireland and Irishness.6 Like Wilde, revivalists critique Englishness, though their works focus on Ireland, not England; they counter British colonialism by proffering “authentic” Irish forms and figures in place of colonial representations of Irishness. At the same time, however, the subversive and critical energies that characterize Wilde’s Irish aestheticism in England become considerably blunted when..." @default.
- W2072233983 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W2072233983 creator A5047899688 @default.
- W2072233983 date "2014-01-01" @default.
- W2072233983 modified "2023-10-17" @default.
- W2072233983 title "Irish Aestheticism in Fin-de-Siècle Women’s Writing: Art, Realism, and the Nation" @default.
- W2072233983 cites W1264614319 @default.
- W2072233983 cites W1493865929 @default.
- W2072233983 cites W1496047290 @default.
- W2072233983 cites W1501791444 @default.
- W2072233983 cites W1512773166 @default.
- W2072233983 cites W1513333779 @default.
- W2072233983 cites W1531598180 @default.
- W2072233983 cites W1547638630 @default.
- W2072233983 cites W1549863368 @default.
- W2072233983 cites W1559935725 @default.
- W2072233983 cites W1561639581 @default.
- W2072233983 cites W1570714236 @default.
- W2072233983 cites W1583814375 @default.
- W2072233983 cites W1591546924 @default.
- W2072233983 cites W1607592727 @default.
- W2072233983 cites W1959649716 @default.
- W2072233983 cites W2006825166 @default.
- W2072233983 cites W2032412609 @default.
- W2072233983 cites W2038031042 @default.
- W2072233983 cites W2053387406 @default.
- W2072233983 cites W2086951736 @default.
- W2072233983 cites W2107290929 @default.
- W2072233983 cites W2114641803 @default.
- W2072233983 cites W2322654066 @default.
- W2072233983 cites W2329587208 @default.
- W2072233983 cites W2488755339 @default.
- W2072233983 cites W2516208144 @default.
- W2072233983 cites W2742172945 @default.
- W2072233983 cites W2799140838 @default.
- W2072233983 cites W298986018 @default.
- W2072233983 cites W2994820014 @default.
- W2072233983 cites W3159464002 @default.
- W2072233983 cites W567203439 @default.
- W2072233983 cites W567610621 @default.
- W2072233983 cites W578537829 @default.
- W2072233983 cites W583904497 @default.
- W2072233983 cites W603555091 @default.
- W2072233983 cites W604254883 @default.
- W2072233983 cites W615050008 @default.
- W2072233983 cites W623292004 @default.
- W2072233983 cites W629009722 @default.
- W2072233983 cites W651558160 @default.
- W2072233983 cites W652157677 @default.
- W2072233983 doi "https://doi.org/10.1353/mod.2014.0056" @default.
- W2072233983 hasPublicationYear "2014" @default.
- W2072233983 type Work @default.
- W2072233983 sameAs 2072233983 @default.
- W2072233983 citedByCount "2" @default.
- W2072233983 countsByYear W20722339832017 @default.
- W2072233983 countsByYear W20722339832019 @default.
- W2072233983 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2072233983 hasAuthorship W2072233983A5047899688 @default.
- W2072233983 hasConcept C107038049 @default.
- W2072233983 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
- W2072233983 hasConcept C124952713 @default.
- W2072233983 hasConcept C136815107 @default.
- W2072233983 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
- W2072233983 hasConcept C142362112 @default.
- W2072233983 hasConcept C205310680 @default.
- W2072233983 hasConcept C2778355321 @default.
- W2072233983 hasConcept C2780623531 @default.
- W2072233983 hasConcept C2780777687 @default.
- W2072233983 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
- W2072233983 hasConcept C52119013 @default.
- W2072233983 hasConcept C543847140 @default.
- W2072233983 hasConceptScore W2072233983C107038049 @default.
- W2072233983 hasConceptScore W2072233983C111472728 @default.
- W2072233983 hasConceptScore W2072233983C124952713 @default.
- W2072233983 hasConceptScore W2072233983C136815107 @default.
- W2072233983 hasConceptScore W2072233983C138885662 @default.
- W2072233983 hasConceptScore W2072233983C142362112 @default.
- W2072233983 hasConceptScore W2072233983C205310680 @default.
- W2072233983 hasConceptScore W2072233983C2778355321 @default.
- W2072233983 hasConceptScore W2072233983C2780623531 @default.
- W2072233983 hasConceptScore W2072233983C2780777687 @default.
- W2072233983 hasConceptScore W2072233983C41895202 @default.
- W2072233983 hasConceptScore W2072233983C52119013 @default.
- W2072233983 hasConceptScore W2072233983C543847140 @default.
- W2072233983 hasIssue "3" @default.
- W2072233983 hasLocation W20722339831 @default.
- W2072233983 hasOpenAccess W2072233983 @default.
- W2072233983 hasPrimaryLocation W20722339831 @default.
- W2072233983 hasRelatedWork W1762647889 @default.
- W2072233983 hasRelatedWork W2072233983 @default.
- W2072233983 hasRelatedWork W2382781688 @default.
- W2072233983 hasRelatedWork W2387919320 @default.
- W2072233983 hasRelatedWork W2390987860 @default.
- W2072233983 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
- W2072233983 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
- W2072233983 hasRelatedWork W4233521249 @default.
- W2072233983 hasRelatedWork W4243874004 @default.
- W2072233983 hasRelatedWork W629009722 @default.