FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2072323058> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2072323058 endingPage "243" @default.
• W2072323058 startingPage "238" @default.
• W2072323058 abstract "In re S (adult: refusal of treatment),' Sir Stephen Brown, President of the Family Division of the High Court, granted a declaration that a caesarian section and consequential treatment could lawfully be performed upon a pregnant woman despite her refusal of consent. The case arose when Mrs S was admitted to hospital with ruptured membranes and in spontaneous labour. The child was in a position of 'transverse lie' and, in the opinion of Mrs S's medical advisors, there was the gravest risk that her uterus would rupture unless the doctors performed a caesarian section. Also, the baby could not be born alive unless the caesarian section was carried out. Mrs S refused consent to the operation because of her religious beliefs and it was found that her mental condition was such that she was competent to decide about her medical treatment. It was held that the operation was lawful 'in the vital interests of both Mrs S and of the unborn child.' As a consequence of the court's declaration the caesarian section was carried out, despite the fact that the unborn child, although alive when the declaration was made, had already died. The decision has been described as 'reigniting the debate over a woman's right to control her body.'2 Sir Stephen Brown P in re S established that the 'right' of an individual to choose whether to consent to medical treatment is not absolute, but may be qualified where the choice may lead to the death of a viable fetus. The possible significance of this decision is twofold. First, it casts doubt on the principle underlying the decision of the Court of Appeal in re T (adult: refusal of treatment)3 that a competent adult patient's refusal of consent to medical treatment may not be overridden in the patient's best interests. Second, it confirms fears that the courts may protect the interests of the unborn child at the expense of those of the mother. Although decisions similar to re S have been reached in the United States, this is the first time that an English court has declared that a caesarian section is lawful despite the woman's refusal. It is also the first decision to be based on the interests of both the mother and the unborn child. In the United States such declarations have been based solely on the basis of the interests of the unborn child.4" @default.
• W2072323058 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2072323058 creator A5052822881 @default.
• W2072323058 date "1993-03-01" @default.
• W2072323058 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W2072323058 title "Court-Ordered Caesarian Sections: In Whose Interests?" @default.
• W2072323058 doi "https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2230.1993.tb00961.x" @default.
• W2072323058 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11652316" @default.
• W2072323058 hasPublicationYear "1993" @default.
• W2072323058 type Work @default.
• W2072323058 sameAs 2072323058 @default.
• W2072323058 citedByCount "6" @default.
• W2072323058 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2072323058 hasAuthorship W2072323058A5052822881 @default.
• W2072323058 hasBestOaLocation W20723230581 @default.
• W2072323058 hasConcept C131872663 @default.
• W2072323058 hasConcept C138147947 @default.
• W2072323058 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2072323058 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2072323058 hasConcept C187212893 @default.
• W2072323058 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2072323058 hasConcept C2779234561 @default.
• W2072323058 hasConcept C2911037565 @default.
• W2072323058 hasConcept C54355233 @default.
• W2072323058 hasConcept C61434518 @default.
• W2072323058 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2072323058 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2072323058 hasConceptScore W2072323058C131872663 @default.
• W2072323058 hasConceptScore W2072323058C138147947 @default.
• W2072323058 hasConceptScore W2072323058C141071460 @default.
• W2072323058 hasConceptScore W2072323058C17744445 @default.
• W2072323058 hasConceptScore W2072323058C187212893 @default.
• W2072323058 hasConceptScore W2072323058C199539241 @default.
• W2072323058 hasConceptScore W2072323058C2779234561 @default.
• W2072323058 hasConceptScore W2072323058C2911037565 @default.
• W2072323058 hasConceptScore W2072323058C54355233 @default.
• W2072323058 hasConceptScore W2072323058C61434518 @default.
• W2072323058 hasConceptScore W2072323058C71924100 @default.
• W2072323058 hasConceptScore W2072323058C86803240 @default.
• W2072323058 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W2072323058 hasLocation W20723230581 @default.
• W2072323058 hasLocation W20723230582 @default.
• W2072323058 hasOpenAccess W2072323058 @default.
• W2072323058 hasPrimaryLocation W20723230581 @default.
• W2072323058 hasRelatedWork W141977636 @default.
• W2072323058 hasRelatedWork W1585483003 @default.
• W2072323058 hasRelatedWork W1591119109 @default.
• W2072323058 hasRelatedWork W1602201724 @default.
• W2072323058 hasRelatedWork W1770519000 @default.
• W2072323058 hasRelatedWork W1976097977 @default.
• W2072323058 hasRelatedWork W2007897772 @default.
• W2072323058 hasRelatedWork W2035454900 @default.
• W2072323058 hasRelatedWork W2038749989 @default.
• W2072323058 hasRelatedWork W2086665156 @default.
• W2072323058 hasRelatedWork W2087959275 @default.
• W2072323058 hasRelatedWork W2116589172 @default.
• W2072323058 hasRelatedWork W2138063764 @default.
• W2072323058 hasRelatedWork W2167254135 @default.
• W2072323058 hasRelatedWork W2305417143 @default.
• W2072323058 hasRelatedWork W3006321599 @default.
• W2072323058 hasRelatedWork W303716566 @default.
• W2072323058 hasRelatedWork W3154617465 @default.
• W2072323058 hasRelatedWork W934109748 @default.
• W2072323058 hasRelatedWork W1923598663 @default.
• W2072323058 hasVolume "56" @default.
• W2072323058 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2072323058 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2072323058 magId "2072323058" @default.
• W2072323058 workType "article" @default.