FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2072383802> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2072383802 endingPage "21885" @default.
• W2072383802 startingPage "21885" @default.
• W2072383802 abstract "RationaleThe validated 19-item Readiness for Interprofessional Learning Scale (RIPLS) is often used for assessing attitudes toward interprofessional education (IPE). The 12-item Interdisciplinary Education Perception Scale (IEPS), also used for this purpose, has not been validated among the professions of medicine, pharmacy, and physician assistants (PAs). The discriminatory ability of the two scales has not been directly compared. Comparison of the two will aid educators in selecting the optimal scale.ObjectiveTo compare psychometric properties of the RIPLS and IEPS and to examine the ability of each scale to discriminate mean scores among student subgroups (gender, profession, seniority, and prior IPE exposure).MethodWe conducted a cross-sectional (Qualtrics©) survey (RIPLS and IEPS) of junior and senior students in medicine (n=360), pharmacy (n=360), and the PA profession (n=106). Descriptive statistics were used to report aggregate mean scores of subgroups. The internal consistency of each scale was assessed using Cronbach's α. Concurrent validity was measured by Pearson's correlation coefficients. Independent-sample t-tests and analysis of variances (ANOVAs) were performed to assess the discriminatory ability of each scale. Cohen's d effect sizes were calculated for all significant pair-wise comparisons.ResultsResponse rate was 82%. Cronbach's α was 0.85 (RIPLS) and 0.91 (IEPS). The RIPLS discriminated scores by gender among junior students only, and scores by IPE exposure among all students. The IEPS distinguished score differences for the three professions among junior students and by prior IPE exposure for all three professions. Neither scale detected differences in mean scores by profession among all students or by level of training among the three professions.ConclusionsNeither the RIPLS nor the IEPS has greater discriminatory ability for detecting attitude differences among the student subgroups. Reason for differences may be explained by slightly different scale constructs. The RIPLS is designed to assess students’ own attitude toward interprofessional learning, while the IEPS discerns perceived attitudes about team collaboration for students’ own professions and may be more appropriate for more advanced students." @default.
• W2072383802 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2072383802 creator A5012193786 @default.
• W2072383802 creator A5032038527 @default.
• W2072383802 creator A5053880055 @default.
• W2072383802 creator A5067602842 @default.
• W2072383802 date "2013-01-01" @default.
• W2072383802 modified "2023-10-17" @default.
• W2072383802 title "A comparison of two scales for assessing health professional students’ attitude toward interprofessional learning" @default.
• W2072383802 cites W1966269902 @default.
• W2072383802 cites W1980324524 @default.
• W2072383802 cites W1981665776 @default.
• W2072383802 cites W1989753715 @default.
• W2072383802 cites W2010481334 @default.
• W2072383802 cites W2019084976 @default.
• W2072383802 cites W2048602808 @default.
• W2072383802 cites W2050453477 @default.
• W2072383802 cites W2058672258 @default.
• W2072383802 cites W2061141931 @default.
• W2072383802 cites W2067242727 @default.
• W2072383802 cites W2072167211 @default.
• W2072383802 cites W2073307555 @default.
• W2072383802 cites W2101906880 @default.
• W2072383802 cites W2117953600 @default.
• W2072383802 cites W2118425782 @default.
• W2072383802 cites W2119763856 @default.
• W2072383802 cites W2169280509 @default.
• W2072383802 cites W2170566221 @default.
• W2072383802 cites W2312196048 @default.
• W2072383802 cites W3142654781 @default.
• W2072383802 doi "https://doi.org/10.3402/meo.v18i0.21885" @default.
• W2072383802 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/3849511" @default.
• W2072383802 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24300749" @default.
• W2072383802 hasPublicationYear "2013" @default.
• W2072383802 type Work @default.
• W2072383802 sameAs 2072383802 @default.
• W2072383802 citedByCount "45" @default.
• W2072383802 countsByYear W20723838022015 @default.
• W2072383802 countsByYear W20723838022016 @default.
• W2072383802 countsByYear W20723838022017 @default.
• W2072383802 countsByYear W20723838022018 @default.
• W2072383802 countsByYear W20723838022019 @default.
• W2072383802 countsByYear W20723838022020 @default.
• W2072383802 countsByYear W20723838022021 @default.
• W2072383802 countsByYear W20723838022022 @default.
• W2072383802 countsByYear W20723838022023 @default.
• W2072383802 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2072383802 hasAuthorship W2072383802A5012193786 @default.
• W2072383802 hasAuthorship W2072383802A5032038527 @default.
• W2072383802 hasAuthorship W2072383802A5053880055 @default.
• W2072383802 hasAuthorship W2072383802A5067602842 @default.
• W2072383802 hasBestOaLocation W20723838021 @default.
• W2072383802 hasConcept C104863432 @default.
• W2072383802 hasConcept C105776082 @default.
• W2072383802 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
• W2072383802 hasConcept C106906290 @default.
• W2072383802 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W2072383802 hasConcept C138496976 @default.
• W2072383802 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2072383802 hasConcept C160735492 @default.
• W2072383802 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W2072383802 hasConcept C171606756 @default.
• W2072383802 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2072383802 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2072383802 hasConcept C2778755073 @default.
• W2072383802 hasConcept C2780367502 @default.
• W2072383802 hasConcept C2780783599 @default.
• W2072383802 hasConcept C2992671056 @default.
• W2072383802 hasConcept C3018868096 @default.
• W2072383802 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W2072383802 hasConcept C39896193 @default.
• W2072383802 hasConcept C50522688 @default.
• W2072383802 hasConcept C509550671 @default.
• W2072383802 hasConcept C512399662 @default.
• W2072383802 hasConcept C62520636 @default.
• W2072383802 hasConcept C70410870 @default.
• W2072383802 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2072383802 hasConceptScore W2072383802C104863432 @default.
• W2072383802 hasConceptScore W2072383802C105776082 @default.
• W2072383802 hasConceptScore W2072383802C105795698 @default.
• W2072383802 hasConceptScore W2072383802C106906290 @default.
• W2072383802 hasConceptScore W2072383802C121332964 @default.
• W2072383802 hasConceptScore W2072383802C138496976 @default.
• W2072383802 hasConceptScore W2072383802C15744967 @default.
• W2072383802 hasConceptScore W2072383802C160735492 @default.
• W2072383802 hasConceptScore W2072383802C162324750 @default.
• W2072383802 hasConceptScore W2072383802C171606756 @default.
• W2072383802 hasConceptScore W2072383802C17744445 @default.
• W2072383802 hasConceptScore W2072383802C199539241 @default.
• W2072383802 hasConceptScore W2072383802C2778755073 @default.
• W2072383802 hasConceptScore W2072383802C2780367502 @default.
• W2072383802 hasConceptScore W2072383802C2780783599 @default.
• W2072383802 hasConceptScore W2072383802C2992671056 @default.
• W2072383802 hasConceptScore W2072383802C3018868096 @default.
• W2072383802 hasConceptScore W2072383802C33923547 @default.
• W2072383802 hasConceptScore W2072383802C39896193 @default.
• W2072383802 hasConceptScore W2072383802C50522688 @default.
• W2072383802 hasConceptScore W2072383802C509550671 @default.

• next