FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2072496385> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2072496385 endingPage "478" @default.
• W2072496385 startingPage "471" @default.
• W2072496385 abstract "Fractures of the distal radius are very common and mainly occur in the elderly. There has been an increasing use of locked volar plate fixations which report satisfactory results. However, some authors advocate the use of nail fixation.The aim of this study is to compare dorsal nail plate versus locked volar plate fixation in the treatment of distal radius fractures with dorsal tilt.The mean age of the patients was over 50 years. The study included extra-articular distal radius fractures with posterior tilt. We conducted a prospective randomized study between December 2007 and February 2009 including a group of 16 patients treated with a dorsal nail fixation (group 1) and a group of 15 patients managed with a locked volar plate fixation (group II). We analyzed both the clinical results (complications, Range of motion [ROM], tightening strength, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand [DASH] and Mayo Clinic scores) and the radiographic results from A/P and lateral radiographs in the early postoperative period and at 6-month follow-up.ROM toward extension was better in the volar plating subgroup (group I, 42.5°, group II, 57.5°; P<0.05). Pronation mobility was better in the dorsal nail subgroup (group I, 85°; group II, 80°; P<0.05). The locked volar plate fixation subgroup demonstrated a better recovery of the tightening strength as compared with the uninjured side (group I, 78%, group II, 90%, P=0.03). The DASH score was similar in both groups (group I, 22.09±22.9; group II, 20.62±20.3, P>0.05). The Mayo Clinic score was better in the locked volar plate fixation subgroup (group I, 65±13.4; group II, 85.6±19.2; P=0.002). Radiographic results were good in both groups, however anatomical reduction of the volar tilt was significantly better in group II (plate) when compared with the uninjured side. Moreover, we report on two cases of tendinous damages to the long extensor muscle of the thumb in the dorsal nail fixation subgroup despite the use of a minimally invasive implant.The management of distal radius fractures with locked volar plate fixation in active elderly patients has proved successful and leads to better results than nail fixation regarding both reduction quality and objective functional scores.Level II, prospective, randomized of low-level." @default.
• W2072496385 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2072496385 creator A5003343143 @default.
• W2072496385 creator A5028713301 @default.
• W2072496385 creator A5066636586 @default.
• W2072496385 date "2011-09-01" @default.
• W2072496385 modified "2023-10-12" @default.
• W2072496385 title "Dorsally displaced extra-articular distal radius fractures fixation: Dorsal IM nailing versus volar plating. A randomized controlled trial" @default.
• W2072496385 cites W1966103476 @default.
• W2072496385 cites W1970754496 @default.
• W2072496385 cites W1972728422 @default.
• W2072496385 cites W1973466401 @default.
• W2072496385 cites W1974884549 @default.
• W2072496385 cites W1975014657 @default.
• W2072496385 cites W1997752968 @default.
• W2072496385 cites W2053854573 @default.
• W2072496385 cites W2065746126 @default.
• W2072496385 cites W2074170271 @default.
• W2072496385 cites W2077697561 @default.
• W2072496385 cites W2080276030 @default.
• W2072496385 cites W2083407632 @default.
• W2072496385 cites W2095998687 @default.
• W2072496385 cites W2098628276 @default.
• W2072496385 cites W2109131664 @default.
• W2072496385 cites W2109490480 @default.
• W2072496385 cites W2117429843 @default.
• W2072496385 cites W2121797208 @default.
• W2072496385 cites W2124463422 @default.
• W2072496385 cites W2126926535 @default.
• W2072496385 cites W2162060350 @default.
• W2072496385 cites W2174566585 @default.
• W2072496385 cites W2203831960 @default.
• W2072496385 cites W2983763873 @default.
• W2072496385 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2010.11.011" @default.
• W2072496385 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21659011" @default.
• W2072496385 hasPublicationYear "2011" @default.
• W2072496385 type Work @default.
• W2072496385 sameAs 2072496385 @default.
• W2072496385 citedByCount "38" @default.
• W2072496385 countsByYear W20724963852012 @default.
• W2072496385 countsByYear W20724963852013 @default.
• W2072496385 countsByYear W20724963852014 @default.
• W2072496385 countsByYear W20724963852015 @default.
• W2072496385 countsByYear W20724963852016 @default.
• W2072496385 countsByYear W20724963852017 @default.
• W2072496385 countsByYear W20724963852018 @default.
• W2072496385 countsByYear W20724963852019 @default.
• W2072496385 countsByYear W20724963852020 @default.
• W2072496385 countsByYear W20724963852021 @default.
• W2072496385 countsByYear W20724963852022 @default.
• W2072496385 countsByYear W20724963852023 @default.
• W2072496385 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2072496385 hasAuthorship W2072496385A5003343143 @default.
• W2072496385 hasAuthorship W2072496385A5028713301 @default.
• W2072496385 hasAuthorship W2072496385A5066636586 @default.
• W2072496385 hasBestOaLocation W20724963851 @default.
• W2072496385 hasConcept C105702510 @default.
• W2072496385 hasConcept C111919701 @default.
• W2072496385 hasConcept C140530291 @default.
• W2072496385 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2072496385 hasConcept C146249460 @default.
• W2072496385 hasConcept C2776090536 @default.
• W2072496385 hasConcept C2908647359 @default.
• W2072496385 hasConcept C29694066 @default.
• W2072496385 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2072496385 hasConcept C60465272 @default.
• W2072496385 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2072496385 hasConcept C99454951 @default.
• W2072496385 hasConceptScore W2072496385C105702510 @default.
• W2072496385 hasConceptScore W2072496385C111919701 @default.
• W2072496385 hasConceptScore W2072496385C140530291 @default.
• W2072496385 hasConceptScore W2072496385C141071460 @default.
• W2072496385 hasConceptScore W2072496385C146249460 @default.
• W2072496385 hasConceptScore W2072496385C2776090536 @default.
• W2072496385 hasConceptScore W2072496385C2908647359 @default.
• W2072496385 hasConceptScore W2072496385C29694066 @default.
• W2072496385 hasConceptScore W2072496385C41008148 @default.
• W2072496385 hasConceptScore W2072496385C60465272 @default.
• W2072496385 hasConceptScore W2072496385C71924100 @default.
• W2072496385 hasConceptScore W2072496385C99454951 @default.
• W2072496385 hasIssue "5" @default.
• W2072496385 hasLocation W20724963851 @default.
• W2072496385 hasLocation W20724963852 @default.
• W2072496385 hasOpenAccess W2072496385 @default.
• W2072496385 hasPrimaryLocation W20724963851 @default.
• W2072496385 hasRelatedWork W1558801379 @default.
• W2072496385 hasRelatedWork W1603294850 @default.
• W2072496385 hasRelatedWork W2290529631 @default.
• W2072496385 hasRelatedWork W2361827796 @default.
• W2072496385 hasRelatedWork W2415356993 @default.
• W2072496385 hasRelatedWork W2603355878 @default.
• W2072496385 hasRelatedWork W2982488398 @default.
• W2072496385 hasRelatedWork W3123507829 @default.
• W2072496385 hasRelatedWork W3172060415 @default.
• W2072496385 hasRelatedWork W4376486551 @default.
• W2072496385 hasVolume "97" @default.
• W2072496385 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2072496385 isRetracted "false" @default.

• next