FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2072829136> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2072829136 endingPage "e23" @default.
• W2072829136 startingPage "e23" @default.
• W2072829136 abstract "Improved communication from physician- patient emailing is an important element of patient centeredness. Physician-patient email use has been low; and previous data from Florida suggest that physicians who email with patients rarely implement best-practice guidelines designed to protect physicians and patients.Our objective was to examine whether email use with patients has changed over time (2005-2008) by using two surveys of Florida physicians, and to determine whether physicians have more readily embraced the best-practice guidelines in 2008 versus 2005. Lastly, we explored the 2008 factors associated with email use with patients and determined whether these factors changed relative to 2005.Our pooled time-series design used results from a 2005 survey (targeting 14,921 physicians) and a separate 2008 survey (targeting 7003 different physicians). In both years, physicians practicing in the outpatient setting were targeted with proportionally identical sampling strategies. Combined data from questions focusing on email use were analyzed using chi-square analysis, Fisher exact test, and logistic regression.A combined 6260 responses were available for analyses, representing a participation rate of 28.2% (4203/14,921) in 2005 and 29.4% (2057/7003) in 2008. Relative to 2005, respondents in 2008 were more likely to indicate that they personally used email with patients (690/4148, 16.6% vs 408/2001, 20.4%, c(2) (1) = 13.0, P < .001). However, physicians who reported frequently using email with patients did not change from 2005 to 2008 (2.9% vs 59/2001, 2.9%). Interest among physicians in future email use with patients was lower in 2008 (58.4% vs 52.8%, c(2) (2) = 16.6, P < .001). Adherence to email best practices remained low in 2008. When comparing 2005 and 2008 adherences with each of the individual guidelines, rates decreased over time in each category and were significantly lower for 4 of the 13 guidelines. Physician characteristics in 2008 that predicted email use with patients were different from 2005. Specifically, in multivariate analysis female physicians (OR 1.48, 95% CI 1.12-1.95), specialist physicians (OR 1.43, 95% CI 1.12-1.84), and those in a multispecialty practice (OR 1.76, 95% CI 1.30-2.37) were more likely than their counterparts to email with patients. Additionally, self-reported computer competency levels (on a 5-point Likert scale) among physicians predicted email use at every level of response.Email use between physicians and patients has changed little between 2005 and 2008. However, future physician interest in using email with patients has decreased. More troubling is the decrease in adherence to best practices designed to protect physicians and patients when using email. Policy makers wanting to harness the potential benefits of physician-patient email should devise plans to encourage adherence to best practices. These plans should also educate physicians on the existence of best practices and methods to incorporate these guidelines into routine workflows." @default.
• W2072829136 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2072829136 creator A5021369070 @default.
• W2072829136 creator A5068434823 @default.
• W2072829136 creator A5070192685 @default.
• W2072829136 date "2011-02-25" @default.
• W2072829136 modified "2023-10-01" @default.
• W2072829136 title "The Use of Physician-Patient Email: A Follow-up Examination of Adoption and Best-Practice Adherence 2005-2008" @default.
• W2072829136 cites W1974978438 @default.
• W2072829136 cites W1979771499 @default.
• W2072829136 cites W1982420458 @default.
• W2072829136 cites W1987774112 @default.
• W2072829136 cites W1988760093 @default.
• W2072829136 cites W1991166317 @default.
• W2072829136 cites W1991599215 @default.
• W2072829136 cites W2016713554 @default.
• W2072829136 cites W2018183097 @default.
• W2072829136 cites W2021581506 @default.
• W2072829136 cites W2033759514 @default.
• W2072829136 cites W2039522453 @default.
• W2072829136 cites W2045623841 @default.
• W2072829136 cites W2048201887 @default.
• W2072829136 cites W2051963088 @default.
• W2072829136 cites W2060519192 @default.
• W2072829136 cites W2066748180 @default.
• W2072829136 cites W2072712239 @default.
• W2072829136 cites W2074474751 @default.
• W2072829136 cites W2082168677 @default.
• W2072829136 cites W2085207521 @default.
• W2072829136 cites W2090405343 @default.
• W2072829136 cites W2094604004 @default.
• W2072829136 cites W2099143194 @default.
• W2072829136 cites W2119517687 @default.
• W2072829136 cites W2124899758 @default.
• W2072829136 cites W2135640763 @default.
• W2072829136 cites W2135732292 @default.
• W2072829136 cites W2149623910 @default.
• W2072829136 cites W2150917554 @default.
• W2072829136 cites W2331305813 @default.
• W2072829136 doi "https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.1578" @default.
• W2072829136 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/3221345" @default.
• W2072829136 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21447468" @default.
• W2072829136 hasPublicationYear "2011" @default.
• W2072829136 type Work @default.
• W2072829136 sameAs 2072829136 @default.
• W2072829136 citedByCount "47" @default.
• W2072829136 countsByYear W20728291362012 @default.
• W2072829136 countsByYear W20728291362013 @default.
• W2072829136 countsByYear W20728291362014 @default.
• W2072829136 countsByYear W20728291362015 @default.
• W2072829136 countsByYear W20728291362016 @default.
• W2072829136 countsByYear W20728291362017 @default.
• W2072829136 countsByYear W20728291362018 @default.
• W2072829136 countsByYear W20728291362019 @default.
• W2072829136 countsByYear W20728291362021 @default.
• W2072829136 countsByYear W20728291362022 @default.
• W2072829136 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2072829136 hasAuthorship W2072829136A5021369070 @default.
• W2072829136 hasAuthorship W2072829136A5068434823 @default.
• W2072829136 hasAuthorship W2072829136A5070192685 @default.
• W2072829136 hasBestOaLocation W20728291361 @default.
• W2072829136 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2072829136 hasConcept C151956035 @default.
• W2072829136 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W2072829136 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2072829136 hasConcept C184356942 @default.
• W2072829136 hasConcept C187736073 @default.
• W2072829136 hasConcept C191093355 @default.
• W2072829136 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2072829136 hasConcept C2779473830 @default.
• W2072829136 hasConcept C512399662 @default.
• W2072829136 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2072829136 hasConceptScore W2072829136C126322002 @default.
• W2072829136 hasConceptScore W2072829136C151956035 @default.
• W2072829136 hasConceptScore W2072829136C162324750 @default.
• W2072829136 hasConceptScore W2072829136C17744445 @default.
• W2072829136 hasConceptScore W2072829136C184356942 @default.
• W2072829136 hasConceptScore W2072829136C187736073 @default.
• W2072829136 hasConceptScore W2072829136C191093355 @default.
• W2072829136 hasConceptScore W2072829136C199539241 @default.
• W2072829136 hasConceptScore W2072829136C2779473830 @default.
• W2072829136 hasConceptScore W2072829136C512399662 @default.
• W2072829136 hasConceptScore W2072829136C71924100 @default.
• W2072829136 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W2072829136 hasLocation W20728291361 @default.
• W2072829136 hasLocation W20728291362 @default.
• W2072829136 hasLocation W20728291363 @default.
• W2072829136 hasLocation W20728291364 @default.
• W2072829136 hasOpenAccess W2072829136 @default.
• W2072829136 hasPrimaryLocation W20728291361 @default.
• W2072829136 hasRelatedWork W2006205095 @default.
• W2072829136 hasRelatedWork W2090557972 @default.
• W2072829136 hasRelatedWork W2389709268 @default.
• W2072829136 hasRelatedWork W2489449084 @default.
• W2072829136 hasRelatedWork W2885961965 @default.
• W2072829136 hasRelatedWork W3194282429 @default.
• W2072829136 hasRelatedWork W3214034395 @default.
• W2072829136 hasRelatedWork W4248444984 @default.

• next