FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2072846287> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2072846287 endingPage "371" @default.
• W2072846287 startingPage "357" @default.
• W2072846287 abstract "Metaphors have traditionally been defined as mappings between two conceptual domains, the target and the source. A fundamental question here is how people assign the target and source functions in a given metaphorical expression. The present paper proposes that there are two potential mechanisms, a linguistic one and a conceptual one that people might use to assign the target and source functions in a given metaphorical expression (e.g., “a green inspiration”). The linguistic mechanism is based on certain conventions which assign the target function to certain grammatical categories (e.g., the head noun of a metaphorical noun phrase), and the source function to others (e.g., the modifying adjective). The conceptual preference mechanism favors the assignment of the source function to accessible concepts and the target function to less accessible ones. Since there are clashing cases, namely, cases where the two mechanisms yield conflicting target/source assignments, the question of interest is which of these two mechanisms, the linguistic or the conceptual one is a better predictor of the way people assign the target and source functions in metaphorical expressions. The major goal of the present paper is to investigate this issue for a specific type of figure—the synaesthetic metaphor. The paper begins by introducing a conceptual preference principle, according to which terms belonging to lower sensory modalities (e.g., touch and taste) are generally assigned the source function, while terms belonging to higher sensory modalities (e.g., vision and hearing) are generally assigned the target function. We then introduce a linguistic convention for assigning these functions to the linguistic constituents of the Hebrew noun–noun genitive construction. We report the findings of two interpretation generation experiments which support the hypothesis that the conceptual preference principle overrules the linguistic convention in people’s assignments of the target and source functions in the synaesthetic genitive construction. The implications of these findings are elaborated in the discussion." @default.
• W2072846287 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2072846287 creator A5007452448 @default.
• W2072846287 creator A5076593895 @default.
• W2072846287 date "2009-02-01" @default.
• W2072846287 modified "2023-10-11" @default.
• W2072846287 title "How to interpret the music of caressing: Target and source assignment in synaesthetic genitive constructions" @default.
• W2072846287 cites W1981106480 @default.
• W2072846287 cites W1995883077 @default.
• W2072846287 cites W1999134540 @default.
• W2072846287 cites W2005622578 @default.
• W2072846287 cites W2007306169 @default.
• W2072846287 cites W2031508092 @default.
• W2072846287 cites W2059975159 @default.
• W2072846287 cites W2074036902 @default.
• W2072846287 cites W2077537995 @default.
• W2072846287 cites W2085639768 @default.
• W2072846287 cites W2129459981 @default.
• W2072846287 cites W2131275378 @default.
• W2072846287 cites W2163084291 @default.
• W2072846287 cites W2312344930 @default.
• W2072846287 cites W2313932733 @default.
• W2072846287 cites W2324608545 @default.
• W2072846287 cites W4238576779 @default.
• W2072846287 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2008.08.002" @default.
• W2072846287 hasPublicationYear "2009" @default.
• W2072846287 type Work @default.
• W2072846287 sameAs 2072846287 @default.
• W2072846287 citedByCount "17" @default.
• W2072846287 countsByYear W20728462872013 @default.
• W2072846287 countsByYear W20728462872015 @default.
• W2072846287 countsByYear W20728462872019 @default.
• W2072846287 countsByYear W20728462872020 @default.
• W2072846287 countsByYear W20728462872021 @default.
• W2072846287 countsByYear W20728462872022 @default.
• W2072846287 countsByYear W20728462872023 @default.
• W2072846287 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2072846287 hasAuthorship W2072846287A5007452448 @default.
• W2072846287 hasAuthorship W2072846287A5076593895 @default.
• W2072846287 hasConcept C121934690 @default.
• W2072846287 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W2072846287 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2072846287 hasConcept C28490314 @default.
• W2072846287 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2072846287 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
• W2072846287 hasConcept C46312422 @default.
• W2072846287 hasConcept C5747526 @default.
• W2072846287 hasConceptScore W2072846287C121934690 @default.
• W2072846287 hasConceptScore W2072846287C138885662 @default.
• W2072846287 hasConceptScore W2072846287C15744967 @default.
• W2072846287 hasConceptScore W2072846287C28490314 @default.
• W2072846287 hasConceptScore W2072846287C41008148 @default.
• W2072846287 hasConceptScore W2072846287C41895202 @default.
• W2072846287 hasConceptScore W2072846287C46312422 @default.
• W2072846287 hasConceptScore W2072846287C5747526 @default.
• W2072846287 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W2072846287 hasLocation W20728462871 @default.
• W2072846287 hasOpenAccess W2072846287 @default.
• W2072846287 hasPrimaryLocation W20728462871 @default.
• W2072846287 hasRelatedWork W1992173961 @default.
• W2072846287 hasRelatedWork W2019013480 @default.
• W2072846287 hasRelatedWork W2068584649 @default.
• W2072846287 hasRelatedWork W2115841570 @default.
• W2072846287 hasRelatedWork W2235685183 @default.
• W2072846287 hasRelatedWork W2769406623 @default.
• W2072846287 hasRelatedWork W3033066957 @default.
• W2072846287 hasRelatedWork W3095745100 @default.
• W2072846287 hasRelatedWork W2043522774 @default.
• W2072846287 hasRelatedWork W2582290357 @default.
• W2072846287 hasVolume "41" @default.
• W2072846287 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2072846287 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2072846287 magId "2072846287" @default.
• W2072846287 workType "article" @default.