FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2073182685> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2073182685 endingPage "686" @default.
• W2073182685 startingPage "681" @default.
• W2073182685 abstract "This study is a reliability analysis of coronal Cobb angle measurements in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis obtained by multiple observers.We sought to quantify and compare the interobserver reliability of conventional radiographs and 3 methods of digital radiography.The use of digital radiography for the evaluation of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis is being widely adopted. Previous studies comparing manual and computer-based measurements have found excellent intraobserver reliability for both techniques. Interobserver reliability of computer-based measurements on digital radiographs has not been compared with manual measurements on conventional radiographs. Other commonly used forms of output of digital radiography have not been studied.Preoperative standing posteroanterior full-length spine radiographs from 40 patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis were examined by 4 observers. Patients were divided into 2 groups of 20 patients. In 1 group, radiographs were obtained by conventional technique. In the other group, radiographs were obtained using a digital radiography system. Three types of output of the identical image obtained by a digital radiography system were examined, including computer-based image, printing of the image fitted onto a single film, or printing of the image onto 2 unstitched films. The Cobb angle, upper vertebra, and lower vertebra of the major curve were measured by each observer. Interobserver reliability for each technique was calculated by intraclass correlation coefficient and interobserver variance.Interobserver reliability as described by intraclass correlation coefficient and interobserver variance was excellent (0.93-0.98) for measurements made on conventional, computer-based, and fitted printed radiographs. The intraclass correlation coefficient was good (0.87) in measurements obtained on radiographs printed on 2 unstitched films.Measurements made on conventional and digital radiographs using manual and computer-based techniques have similar good to excellent interobserver reliability. Interobserver reliability was lower for digital radiographs when printed onto 2 unstitched films. The results suggest that different observers will obtain similar measurements when viewing the same image, but care should be taken when interpreting images printed on 2 unstitched films." @default.
• W2073182685 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2073182685 creator A5011671262 @default.
• W2073182685 creator A5021346899 @default.
• W2073182685 creator A5041636508 @default.
• W2073182685 creator A5059868247 @default.
• W2073182685 creator A5062167398 @default.
• W2073182685 creator A5067679162 @default.
• W2073182685 date "2008-03-01" @default.
• W2073182685 modified "2023-10-01" @default.
• W2073182685 title "Comparison of Observer Variation in Conventional and Three Digital Radiographic Methods Used in the Evaluation of Patients With Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis" @default.
• W2073182685 cites W152404302 @default.
• W2073182685 cites W1965406032 @default.
• W2073182685 cites W1968623643 @default.
• W2073182685 cites W2040255623 @default.
• W2073182685 cites W2042311485 @default.
• W2073182685 cites W2046757375 @default.
• W2073182685 cites W2059935978 @default.
• W2073182685 cites W2072907028 @default.
• W2073182685 cites W2074837677 @default.
• W2073182685 cites W2110733101 @default.
• W2073182685 cites W2118733911 @default.
• W2073182685 cites W2139774746 @default.
• W2073182685 cites W2277902788 @default.
• W2073182685 cites W2286403959 @default.
• W2073182685 cites W2288557819 @default.
• W2073182685 cites W2327931466 @default.
• W2073182685 cites W2328221614 @default.
• W2073182685 doi "https://doi.org/10.1097/brs.0b013e318166aa8d" @default.
• W2073182685 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18344863" @default.
• W2073182685 hasPublicationYear "2008" @default.
• W2073182685 type Work @default.
• W2073182685 sameAs 2073182685 @default.
• W2073182685 citedByCount "58" @default.
• W2073182685 countsByYear W20731826852012 @default.
• W2073182685 countsByYear W20731826852013 @default.
• W2073182685 countsByYear W20731826852014 @default.
• W2073182685 countsByYear W20731826852015 @default.
• W2073182685 countsByYear W20731826852016 @default.
• W2073182685 countsByYear W20731826852017 @default.
• W2073182685 countsByYear W20731826852018 @default.
• W2073182685 countsByYear W20731826852019 @default.
• W2073182685 countsByYear W20731826852020 @default.
• W2073182685 countsByYear W20731826852021 @default.
• W2073182685 countsByYear W20731826852022 @default.
• W2073182685 countsByYear W20731826852023 @default.
• W2073182685 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2073182685 hasAuthorship W2073182685A5011671262 @default.
• W2073182685 hasAuthorship W2073182685A5021346899 @default.
• W2073182685 hasAuthorship W2073182685A5041636508 @default.
• W2073182685 hasAuthorship W2073182685A5059868247 @default.
• W2073182685 hasAuthorship W2073182685A5062167398 @default.
• W2073182685 hasAuthorship W2073182685A5067679162 @default.
• W2073182685 hasConcept C104709138 @default.
• W2073182685 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
• W2073182685 hasConcept C115961682 @default.
• W2073182685 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W2073182685 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
• W2073182685 hasConcept C134093067 @default.
• W2073182685 hasConcept C13483470 @default.
• W2073182685 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2073182685 hasConcept C163258240 @default.
• W2073182685 hasConcept C171606756 @default.
• W2073182685 hasConcept C2778871979 @default.
• W2073182685 hasConcept C2780955175 @default.
• W2073182685 hasConcept C2781305912 @default.
• W2073182685 hasConcept C29694066 @default.
• W2073182685 hasConcept C2989005 @default.
• W2073182685 hasConcept C2993634128 @default.
• W2073182685 hasConcept C31972630 @default.
• W2073182685 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W2073182685 hasConcept C36454342 @default.
• W2073182685 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2073182685 hasConcept C43214815 @default.
• W2073182685 hasConcept C55020928 @default.
• W2073182685 hasConcept C62520636 @default.
• W2073182685 hasConcept C70410870 @default.
• W2073182685 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2073182685 hasConcept C9893847 @default.
• W2073182685 hasConceptScore W2073182685C104709138 @default.
• W2073182685 hasConceptScore W2073182685C105795698 @default.
• W2073182685 hasConceptScore W2073182685C115961682 @default.
• W2073182685 hasConceptScore W2073182685C121332964 @default.
• W2073182685 hasConceptScore W2073182685C126838900 @default.
• W2073182685 hasConceptScore W2073182685C134093067 @default.
• W2073182685 hasConceptScore W2073182685C13483470 @default.
• W2073182685 hasConceptScore W2073182685C141071460 @default.
• W2073182685 hasConceptScore W2073182685C163258240 @default.
• W2073182685 hasConceptScore W2073182685C171606756 @default.
• W2073182685 hasConceptScore W2073182685C2778871979 @default.
• W2073182685 hasConceptScore W2073182685C2780955175 @default.
• W2073182685 hasConceptScore W2073182685C2781305912 @default.
• W2073182685 hasConceptScore W2073182685C29694066 @default.
• W2073182685 hasConceptScore W2073182685C2989005 @default.
• W2073182685 hasConceptScore W2073182685C2993634128 @default.
• W2073182685 hasConceptScore W2073182685C31972630 @default.
• W2073182685 hasConceptScore W2073182685C33923547 @default.
• W2073182685 hasConceptScore W2073182685C36454342 @default.

• next