FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2073206578> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2073206578 endingPage "202" @default.
• W2073206578 startingPage "202" @default.
• W2073206578 abstract "To the Editor Although it is encouraging to read of the awareness of the potential impact of anesthesiologists on disease transmission in the operating room (OR) through a prospective study1 and expert opinion,2,3 with emphasis on more diligent handwashing, the data do not support the conclusion by Loftus et al.1 that “bacterial organisms on hands of providers explained a fairly large proportion of overall environmental and patient IV stopcock set contamination.” More specifically, anesthesia providers were identified as the origin in 12% of environmental contamination cases (10% of total cases) and 5.5% of the IV stopcock cases. Neither of these are “a fairly large proportion.” More pressing is the origin of 88% of environmental and 94.5% of stopcock contaminants. These could be innumerable personnel in the OR, preoperative area, patient escort, or even the valet parking attendant. Anesthesiologist transmission to the stopcock is no more likely than ineffective decontamination between cases (7% for environment, 5% for stopcock). How does this documented transmission rate compare to the daily OR activity with 6-armed robots, lengthy laparoscopic instruments or orthopedic nailing apparatus, or redraping of the radiograph machine for multiple lateral views? One editorial opines, “If we have reached a plateau in attempts to lower the SSI rate because we have gone as far as we reasonably can with surgical antisepsis, then remaining targets are the patient and anesthesia provider.”2 Clearly, we have not reached any plateau of surgical antisepsis given daily OR logistics. How does the anesthesia provider become a primary focus when the anesthesiologist is associated with contamination in 1/12 (environmental) and 1/20 (stopcock) cases? As leaders in patient safety, identification of any ill effect that anesthesiologists could have on patients is necessary. However, an individual's “microbiome” does not equal infection. Evidence cannot be overinterpreted, as we run the risk of being “slimed” in the more customary fashion: if a surgical patient has complications, it must have been due to the coincidental anesthetic. Evan G. Pivalizza, MD Sam D. Gumbert, MD Douglas Maposa, MD Department of Anesthesiology University of Texas Medical School–Houston Houston, Texas [email protected]" @default.
• W2073206578 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2073206578 creator A5010051009 @default.
• W2073206578 creator A5038383658 @default.
• W2073206578 creator A5046842417 @default.
• W2073206578 date "2011-07-01" @default.
• W2073206578 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
• W2073206578 title "Is Hand Contamination of Anesthesiologists Really an “Important” Risk Factor for Intraoperative Bacterial Transmission?" @default.
• W2073206578 cites W2167741446 @default.
• W2073206578 cites W2110430200 @default.
• W2073206578 doi "https://doi.org/10.1213/ane.0b013e31821d0b21" @default.
• W2073206578 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21700695" @default.
• W2073206578 hasPublicationYear "2011" @default.
• W2073206578 type Work @default.
• W2073206578 sameAs 2073206578 @default.
• W2073206578 citedByCount "2" @default.
• W2073206578 countsByYear W20732065782013 @default.
• W2073206578 countsByYear W20732065782014 @default.
• W2073206578 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2073206578 hasAuthorship W2073206578A5010051009 @default.
• W2073206578 hasAuthorship W2073206578A5038383658 @default.
• W2073206578 hasAuthorship W2073206578A5046842417 @default.
• W2073206578 hasBestOaLocation W20732065781 @default.
• W2073206578 hasConcept C112570922 @default.
• W2073206578 hasConcept C119599485 @default.
• W2073206578 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W2073206578 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2073206578 hasConcept C18903297 @default.
• W2073206578 hasConcept C2908920802 @default.
• W2073206578 hasConcept C545542383 @default.
• W2073206578 hasConcept C61434518 @default.
• W2073206578 hasConcept C68312169 @default.
• W2073206578 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2073206578 hasConcept C761482 @default.
• W2073206578 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2073206578 hasConceptScore W2073206578C112570922 @default.
• W2073206578 hasConceptScore W2073206578C119599485 @default.
• W2073206578 hasConceptScore W2073206578C127413603 @default.
• W2073206578 hasConceptScore W2073206578C141071460 @default.
• W2073206578 hasConceptScore W2073206578C18903297 @default.
• W2073206578 hasConceptScore W2073206578C2908920802 @default.
• W2073206578 hasConceptScore W2073206578C545542383 @default.
• W2073206578 hasConceptScore W2073206578C61434518 @default.
• W2073206578 hasConceptScore W2073206578C68312169 @default.
• W2073206578 hasConceptScore W2073206578C71924100 @default.
• W2073206578 hasConceptScore W2073206578C761482 @default.
• W2073206578 hasConceptScore W2073206578C86803240 @default.
• W2073206578 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W2073206578 hasLocation W20732065781 @default.
• W2073206578 hasLocation W20732065782 @default.
• W2073206578 hasLocation W20732065783 @default.
• W2073206578 hasOpenAccess W2073206578 @default.
• W2073206578 hasPrimaryLocation W20732065781 @default.
• W2073206578 hasRelatedWork W1586374228 @default.
• W2073206578 hasRelatedWork W2003938723 @default.
• W2073206578 hasRelatedWork W2047967234 @default.
• W2073206578 hasRelatedWork W2118496982 @default.
• W2073206578 hasRelatedWork W214433981 @default.
• W2073206578 hasRelatedWork W2364998975 @default.
• W2073206578 hasRelatedWork W2369162477 @default.
• W2073206578 hasRelatedWork W2439875401 @default.
• W2073206578 hasRelatedWork W4238867864 @default.
• W2073206578 hasRelatedWork W2525756941 @default.
• W2073206578 hasVolume "113" @default.
• W2073206578 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2073206578 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2073206578 magId "2073206578" @default.
• W2073206578 workType "article" @default.