Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2073408369> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 60 of
60
with 100 items per page.
- W2073408369 endingPage "S352" @default.
- W2073408369 startingPage "S351" @default.
- W2073408369 abstract "The National Burn Repository (NBR) currently only contains inpatient data from participating United States burn centres. However, the majority of the patients treated in burn centres are managed as outpatients. Unfortunately, this significant demographic is not represented in the NBR annual report. The purpose of this study is to compare the difference in aetiology and demographics between inpatient and outpatient burn patients. In addition, the workload demands for data entry of inpatient and outpatient records in the burn registry will be compared.Outpatient and inpatient burn data at an American Burn Association-Verified Burn Center were prospectively collected during fiscal year 2008. Data collected included age, burn size and aetiology of burn. Aetiology was also stratified by age group. Inpatient data were compared with outpatient data with Fisher's exact test. The amount of time taken to enter inpatients’ and outpatients’ data parameters in the TRACS v5.0 database was also recorded.Data were collected for 241 inpatients and for 543 outpatients during fiscal year 2008. No significant differences in gender or race were found between the two groups. When comparing demographics, outpatients tended to be younger (26 ± 19 years vs. 32 ± 22 years, p = 0.01) with a smaller burn size (2.5 ± 7% vs. 6.8 ± 12%, p < 0.001) and a lower frequency of full-thickness burns (17% vs. 41%, p < 0.001).Of the patients managed as an outpatient, a total 29.7% were eventually admitted to the hospital. Just over half of those (16.7%) initially managed in the outpatient setting were admitted for a planned surgical procedure. The other 13% were admitted for pain control and wound-care issues.Injury was more likely to be caused by flame in inpatients (p < 0.001). Scald injuries were more common in the outpatient setting (34% vs. 27%), but this difference did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.079). Outpatients were more likely to be injured with a contact burn (p < 0.0001). Outpatient injury was more likely to be work-related than inpatient injury (p = 0.0497), but less likely to be related to recreational activity (p = 0.006) or arson/abuse/assault (p = 0.0158). An experienced TRACSv5.0 user required 11 ± 0.6 min to enter an inpatient record and 6 ± 0.6 min to enter an outpatient record in the system (p = 0.002).Inpatient injury is more likely to be caused by flame, whereas outpatient injury is more likely to be caused by scald and contact burns. Work-related burn is more likely to be treated in the outpatient setting. Outpatient burn data also take less time to enter. Since significant differences in aetiology exist, outpatient data should be reported separately from inpatient data in order to understand the full spectrum of burn aetiology. The NBR and other registries should be modified to track outpatient burn data and outcomes." @default.
- W2073408369 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W2073408369 creator A5044478853 @default.
- W2073408369 creator A5083182140 @default.
- W2073408369 date "2003-09-01" @default.
- W2073408369 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
- W2073408369 title "1156 Intravenous ports: experience of oncology patients" @default.
- W2073408369 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/s1359-6349(03)91182-7" @default.
- W2073408369 hasPublicationYear "2003" @default.
- W2073408369 type Work @default.
- W2073408369 sameAs 2073408369 @default.
- W2073408369 citedByCount "0" @default.
- W2073408369 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2073408369 hasAuthorship W2073408369A5044478853 @default.
- W2073408369 hasAuthorship W2073408369A5083182140 @default.
- W2073408369 hasConcept C111919701 @default.
- W2073408369 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
- W2073408369 hasConcept C137627325 @default.
- W2073408369 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
- W2073408369 hasConcept C149923435 @default.
- W2073408369 hasConcept C194828623 @default.
- W2073408369 hasConcept C2778476105 @default.
- W2073408369 hasConcept C2778838822 @default.
- W2073408369 hasConcept C2780084366 @default.
- W2073408369 hasConcept C3017944768 @default.
- W2073408369 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
- W2073408369 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W2073408369 hasConceptScore W2073408369C111919701 @default.
- W2073408369 hasConceptScore W2073408369C126322002 @default.
- W2073408369 hasConceptScore W2073408369C137627325 @default.
- W2073408369 hasConceptScore W2073408369C144024400 @default.
- W2073408369 hasConceptScore W2073408369C149923435 @default.
- W2073408369 hasConceptScore W2073408369C194828623 @default.
- W2073408369 hasConceptScore W2073408369C2778476105 @default.
- W2073408369 hasConceptScore W2073408369C2778838822 @default.
- W2073408369 hasConceptScore W2073408369C2780084366 @default.
- W2073408369 hasConceptScore W2073408369C3017944768 @default.
- W2073408369 hasConceptScore W2073408369C41008148 @default.
- W2073408369 hasConceptScore W2073408369C71924100 @default.
- W2073408369 hasIssue "5" @default.
- W2073408369 hasLocation W20734083691 @default.
- W2073408369 hasOpenAccess W2073408369 @default.
- W2073408369 hasPrimaryLocation W20734083691 @default.
- W2073408369 hasRelatedWork W2008908422 @default.
- W2073408369 hasRelatedWork W2034764363 @default.
- W2073408369 hasRelatedWork W2064870554 @default.
- W2073408369 hasRelatedWork W2137758663 @default.
- W2073408369 hasRelatedWork W2203384425 @default.
- W2073408369 hasRelatedWork W2377142024 @default.
- W2073408369 hasRelatedWork W3002986063 @default.
- W2073408369 hasRelatedWork W3017824371 @default.
- W2073408369 hasRelatedWork W4322705554 @default.
- W2073408369 hasRelatedWork W4322729359 @default.
- W2073408369 hasVolume "1" @default.
- W2073408369 isParatext "false" @default.
- W2073408369 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W2073408369 magId "2073408369" @default.
- W2073408369 workType "article" @default.