FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2074425614> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2074425614 endingPage "331" @default.
• W2074425614 startingPage "323" @default.
• W2074425614 abstract "Objective: to evaluate the implementation of a ‘problem-based’ learning (PBL) curriculum within midwifery. Design: a ‘realistic evaluation’ model based on cost-effectiveness models of economics, and incorporating both qualitative and quantitative methodology. The design used historical comparison, comparing students following the new curriculum with a baseline of previous student cohorts and exploring staff and student experiences. Setting: a ‘new’ university, providing a degree-level 18 month pre-registration midwifery programme for an intake of about 40 students per cohort. Participants: all students in the cohort qualifying immediately before the implementation and all those in the first cohort following the new curriculum were invited to participate fully. Assessment outcomes for three cohorts of students qualifying before and the first three cohorts qualifying following the change were analysed. All clinical staff directly involved in mentoring the relevant student groups, all academic staff involved in delivering the new curriculum and the course external examiner were invited to participate. Intervention: the evaluation studied a major change in the way the overall midwifery curriculum was delivered, widely described as PBL. Measurements: students' experiences and perspectives were sought through review of routine evaluation documents, nominal group technique exercises and focus group discussions at about six months following qualification. Clinical staff experiences and perspectives were sought through written structured questionnaires. Academic staff views were sought through personal semi-structured interviews. Participant observation of the process, review of course documents and of staff reflective commentaries were also conducted. Data on student completion rates and final grade were analysed. Findings: although students' views of the curriculum were generally positive, they experienced some discomfort and difficulty in adjustment to a new style of learning. Small group learning, independence and skills in using and conveying information and research evidence were valued aspects of the new approach. Quality of clinical placement experience and university-practice links were an important area of positive experience or concern. Clinical staff views of the curriculum showed considerable stability, with major concerns being the balance of theory and practice time and skills which were not influenced by the curriculum change. At both points, ability to critically evaluate and use evidence in practice was regarded highly. Student outcomes showed some evidence of possible divergence of grades in the new curriculum. Conclusions and implications for practice: the manner and context of implementation of educational change may have important implications for student experiences and outcomes and the experiences of educators. Adequate preparation at all levels for a different, more independent style of learning is important and students are likely to need clear guidance and feedback on their progress in the early stages of the curriculum, to monitor progress and to provide reassurance. Longer-term research is needed to assess the impact of PBL on theory-practice links and on the midwives as practitioners." @default.
• W2074425614 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2074425614 creator A5072028305 @default.
• W2074425614 creator A5076195655 @default.
• W2074425614 date "2001-12-01" @default.
• W2074425614 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
• W2074425614 title "Evaluation of a problem-based curriculum in midwifery" @default.
• W2074425614 cites W1986397504 @default.
• W2074425614 cites W2027188865 @default.
• W2074425614 cites W2029460724 @default.
• W2074425614 cites W2034868451 @default.
• W2074425614 cites W2034894907 @default.
• W2074425614 cites W2075416894 @default.
• W2074425614 cites W2114244972 @default.
• W2074425614 cites W2142535625 @default.
• W2074425614 cites W2568066971 @default.
• W2074425614 cites W4250639036 @default.
• W2074425614 doi "https://doi.org/10.1054/midw.2001.0276" @default.
• W2074425614 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11749065" @default.
• W2074425614 hasPublicationYear "2001" @default.
• W2074425614 type Work @default.
• W2074425614 sameAs 2074425614 @default.
• W2074425614 citedByCount "27" @default.
• W2074425614 countsByYear W20744256142012 @default.
• W2074425614 countsByYear W20744256142013 @default.
• W2074425614 countsByYear W20744256142014 @default.
• W2074425614 countsByYear W20744256142015 @default.
• W2074425614 countsByYear W20744256142019 @default.
• W2074425614 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2074425614 hasAuthorship W2074425614A5072028305 @default.
• W2074425614 hasAuthorship W2074425614A5076195655 @default.
• W2074425614 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2074425614 hasConcept C131872663 @default.
• W2074425614 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W2074425614 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W2074425614 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2074425614 hasConcept C159110408 @default.
• W2074425614 hasConcept C190248442 @default.
• W2074425614 hasConcept C19165224 @default.
• W2074425614 hasConcept C19417346 @default.
• W2074425614 hasConcept C201903717 @default.
• W2074425614 hasConcept C2778000598 @default.
• W2074425614 hasConcept C2780665704 @default.
• W2074425614 hasConcept C36289849 @default.
• W2074425614 hasConcept C47177190 @default.
• W2074425614 hasConcept C509550671 @default.
• W2074425614 hasConcept C56995899 @default.
• W2074425614 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2074425614 hasConcept C72563966 @default.
• W2074425614 hasConceptScore W2074425614C126322002 @default.
• W2074425614 hasConceptScore W2074425614C131872663 @default.
• W2074425614 hasConceptScore W2074425614C142724271 @default.
• W2074425614 hasConceptScore W2074425614C144024400 @default.
• W2074425614 hasConceptScore W2074425614C15744967 @default.
• W2074425614 hasConceptScore W2074425614C159110408 @default.
• W2074425614 hasConceptScore W2074425614C190248442 @default.
• W2074425614 hasConceptScore W2074425614C19165224 @default.
• W2074425614 hasConceptScore W2074425614C19417346 @default.
• W2074425614 hasConceptScore W2074425614C201903717 @default.
• W2074425614 hasConceptScore W2074425614C2778000598 @default.
• W2074425614 hasConceptScore W2074425614C2780665704 @default.
• W2074425614 hasConceptScore W2074425614C36289849 @default.
• W2074425614 hasConceptScore W2074425614C47177190 @default.
• W2074425614 hasConceptScore W2074425614C509550671 @default.
• W2074425614 hasConceptScore W2074425614C56995899 @default.
• W2074425614 hasConceptScore W2074425614C71924100 @default.
• W2074425614 hasConceptScore W2074425614C72563966 @default.
• W2074425614 hasIssue "4" @default.
• W2074425614 hasLocation W20744256141 @default.
• W2074425614 hasLocation W20744256142 @default.
• W2074425614 hasOpenAccess W2074425614 @default.
• W2074425614 hasPrimaryLocation W20744256141 @default.
• W2074425614 hasRelatedWork W2149191991 @default.
• W2074425614 hasRelatedWork W2293999526 @default.
• W2074425614 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
• W2074425614 hasRelatedWork W2757517411 @default.
• W2074425614 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
• W2074425614 hasRelatedWork W2912567278 @default.
• W2074425614 hasRelatedWork W3176527268 @default.
• W2074425614 hasRelatedWork W4206818082 @default.
• W2074425614 hasRelatedWork W4210373641 @default.
• W2074425614 hasRelatedWork W4224219969 @default.
• W2074425614 hasVolume "17" @default.
• W2074425614 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2074425614 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2074425614 magId "2074425614" @default.
• W2074425614 workType "article" @default.