FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2074865135> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2074865135 endingPage "147" @default.
• W2074865135 startingPage "127" @default.
• W2074865135 abstract "In Chapter 12 of the thirteenth-century Oxford logician William of Sherwood's Treatise on Syncategorematic Words (Syncategoremata), Sherwood discusses the word only (tantum), which in the example Only Socrates is running indicates, according to Sherwood, ‘how much of the subject is under the predicate—viz. that the subject Socrates and no more is under it. In that case it is an exclusive word’ (Sherwood 1968: 8I). In Chapter 7 of the twentieth-century English logician Peter Geach's (1962/1980) Reference and Generality, Geach discusses the words only and alone, remarking that medieval logicians ‘were greatly interested in exclusive propositions, but their treatment of them was on the whole superficial. This comes out in their having generally accepted the idea that exclusive propositions were exponible as conjunctions “Socrates alone is wise”, say, as “Socrates is wise and nobody besides (other than) Socrates is wise”… If the force of the exclusive proposition is to exclude everything other than what is named in or by the subject–term from “sharing in the predicate”, that is no reason for reading in an implication that something named by the subject–term does “share in the predicate”’ (Geach 1962/ 208–9). This dispute between English logicians across seven centuries has been echoed in recent and influential work by the Anglo-American philosopher H. Paul Grice and by linguists, notably Laurence Horn in his (1969) ‘A Presuppositional Analysis of ONLY and EVEN’, in his (1989) treatise A Natural History of Negation, Lauri Karttunen and Stanley Peters in their (1979) ‘Conventional Implicature’, and Josef Taglicht in his (1984) book Message and Emphasis: On Focus and Scope in English. In this paper I shall argue that neither Sherwood, with his conjunction analysis of Only x is F, nor Geach, with his non–conjunctive analysis, nor Horn, with his presuppositional analysis, nor Taglicht, with his conjunction analysis of only and his conventional implicature analysis of also and even, have accounted for the semantic and pragmatic facts, for their analyses have failed to integrate linguistic facts about topic and focus, about entailments, and about Gricean (1975, 1989) ‘implicatures’. By reconsidering their views I hope to show how a more coherent account can be achieved. In the course of this paper I will offer my own analysis, building on what I have learned from theirs and, I hope, improving on them." @default.
• W2074865135 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2074865135 creator A5039226927 @default.
• W2074865135 date "1991-01-01" @default.
• W2074865135 modified "2023-10-02" @default.
• W2074865135 title "Topic/Comment, Presupposition, Logical Form and Focus Stress Implicatures: The Case of Focal Particles <i>only</i> and <i>also</i>" @default.
• W2074865135 doi "https://doi.org/10.1093/jos/8.1-2.127" @default.
• W2074865135 hasPublicationYear "1991" @default.
• W2074865135 type Work @default.
• W2074865135 sameAs 2074865135 @default.
• W2074865135 citedByCount "61" @default.
• W2074865135 countsByYear W20748651352013 @default.
• W2074865135 countsByYear W20748651352014 @default.
• W2074865135 countsByYear W20748651352015 @default.
• W2074865135 countsByYear W20748651352019 @default.
• W2074865135 countsByYear W20748651352021 @default.
• W2074865135 countsByYear W20748651352022 @default.
• W2074865135 countsByYear W20748651352023 @default.
• W2074865135 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2074865135 hasAuthorship W2074865135A5039226927 @default.
• W2074865135 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
• W2074865135 hasConcept C124952713 @default.
• W2074865135 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W2074865135 hasConcept C142362112 @default.
• W2074865135 hasConcept C161191863 @default.
• W2074865135 hasConcept C21190884 @default.
• W2074865135 hasConcept C2777855551 @default.
• W2074865135 hasConcept C2779259174 @default.
• W2074865135 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2074865135 hasConceptScore W2074865135C111472728 @default.
• W2074865135 hasConceptScore W2074865135C124952713 @default.
• W2074865135 hasConceptScore W2074865135C138885662 @default.
• W2074865135 hasConceptScore W2074865135C142362112 @default.
• W2074865135 hasConceptScore W2074865135C161191863 @default.
• W2074865135 hasConceptScore W2074865135C21190884 @default.
• W2074865135 hasConceptScore W2074865135C2777855551 @default.
• W2074865135 hasConceptScore W2074865135C2779259174 @default.
• W2074865135 hasConceptScore W2074865135C41008148 @default.
• W2074865135 hasIssue "1-2" @default.
• W2074865135 hasLocation W20748651351 @default.
• W2074865135 hasOpenAccess W2074865135 @default.
• W2074865135 hasPrimaryLocation W20748651351 @default.
• W2074865135 hasRelatedWork W119181208 @default.
• W2074865135 hasRelatedWork W1979373494 @default.
• W2074865135 hasRelatedWork W2038475439 @default.
• W2074865135 hasRelatedWork W2132997838 @default.
• W2074865135 hasRelatedWork W2371719309 @default.
• W2074865135 hasRelatedWork W2477638480 @default.
• W2074865135 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
• W2074865135 hasRelatedWork W3208564037 @default.
• W2074865135 hasRelatedWork W4245536940 @default.
• W2074865135 hasRelatedWork W4285011987 @default.
• W2074865135 hasVolume "8" @default.
• W2074865135 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2074865135 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2074865135 magId "2074865135" @default.
• W2074865135 workType "article" @default.