Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2074865266> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 91 of
91
with 100 items per page.
- W2074865266 endingPage "7" @default.
- W2074865266 startingPage "1" @default.
- W2074865266 abstract "This study was designed to test the goodness of fit hypothesis, which proposes that the effectiveness of different coping strategies will be dependent on the appraised controllability of the event. Problem-focused strategies are proposed to be adaptive in situations perceived to be controllable and maladaptive in situations perceived to be uncontrollable. In contrast, high levels of emotion-focused coping are proposed to have positive effects on adaptation in uncontrollable situations and negative effects in controllable situations. Data obtained from a sample of university students and community residents (n = 101), provided some support for these hypotheses. High relative levels of problem-focused coping were associated with favourable ratings of coping efficacy only in situations appraised to be controllable, while the negative effects of self-denigration were more marked in controllable than uncontrollable situations. There was, however, no support for the expectation that high levels of problem-focused coping would be maladaptive in situations appraised to be uncontrollable, or for the expectation that the use of emotion-focused coping would be adaptive in such situations. There was also no support for the proposal that the effectiveness of escapism (an emotion-focused strategy) would be moderated by the appraised controllability of the event. Irrespective of the level of appraised control, escapism was associated with low levels of adaptation." @default.
- W2074865266 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W2074865266 creator A5063057689 @default.
- W2074865266 creator A5083703580 @default.
- W2074865266 date "1992-04-01" @default.
- W2074865266 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
- W2074865266 title "Appraised controllability as a moderator of the effectiveness of different coping strategies: A test of the goodness of fit hypothesis" @default.
- W2074865266 cites W1980436697 @default.
- W2074865266 cites W1989558666 @default.
- W2074865266 cites W1998158116 @default.
- W2074865266 cites W2012463795 @default.
- W2074865266 cites W2067495470 @default.
- W2074865266 cites W2072833030 @default.
- W2074865266 cites W2123180639 @default.
- W2074865266 cites W2132806123 @default.
- W2074865266 cites W2313987504 @default.
- W2074865266 cites W2334464106 @default.
- W2074865266 cites W2413111057 @default.
- W2074865266 cites W2494482106 @default.
- W2074865266 cites W2501776771 @default.
- W2074865266 cites W4231064319 @default.
- W2074865266 cites W4232509873 @default.
- W2074865266 cites W4237042419 @default.
- W2074865266 cites W4247025938 @default.
- W2074865266 cites W4249920979 @default.
- W2074865266 cites W4250288012 @default.
- W2074865266 cites W4250513675 @default.
- W2074865266 cites W4293204512 @default.
- W2074865266 cites W4365787416 @default.
- W2074865266 doi "https://doi.org/10.1080/00049539208260155" @default.
- W2074865266 hasPublicationYear "1992" @default.
- W2074865266 type Work @default.
- W2074865266 sameAs 2074865266 @default.
- W2074865266 citedByCount "169" @default.
- W2074865266 countsByYear W20748652662012 @default.
- W2074865266 countsByYear W20748652662013 @default.
- W2074865266 countsByYear W20748652662014 @default.
- W2074865266 countsByYear W20748652662015 @default.
- W2074865266 countsByYear W20748652662016 @default.
- W2074865266 countsByYear W20748652662017 @default.
- W2074865266 countsByYear W20748652662018 @default.
- W2074865266 countsByYear W20748652662019 @default.
- W2074865266 countsByYear W20748652662020 @default.
- W2074865266 countsByYear W20748652662021 @default.
- W2074865266 countsByYear W20748652662022 @default.
- W2074865266 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2074865266 hasAuthorship W2074865266A5063057689 @default.
- W2074865266 hasAuthorship W2074865266A5083703580 @default.
- W2074865266 hasConcept C118562606 @default.
- W2074865266 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
- W2074865266 hasConcept C180747234 @default.
- W2074865266 hasConcept C28826006 @default.
- W2074865266 hasConcept C3019808486 @default.
- W2074865266 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
- W2074865266 hasConcept C48209547 @default.
- W2074865266 hasConcept C70410870 @default.
- W2074865266 hasConcept C73282008 @default.
- W2074865266 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
- W2074865266 hasConcept C93225998 @default.
- W2074865266 hasConceptScore W2074865266C118562606 @default.
- W2074865266 hasConceptScore W2074865266C15744967 @default.
- W2074865266 hasConceptScore W2074865266C180747234 @default.
- W2074865266 hasConceptScore W2074865266C28826006 @default.
- W2074865266 hasConceptScore W2074865266C3019808486 @default.
- W2074865266 hasConceptScore W2074865266C33923547 @default.
- W2074865266 hasConceptScore W2074865266C48209547 @default.
- W2074865266 hasConceptScore W2074865266C70410870 @default.
- W2074865266 hasConceptScore W2074865266C73282008 @default.
- W2074865266 hasConceptScore W2074865266C77805123 @default.
- W2074865266 hasConceptScore W2074865266C93225998 @default.
- W2074865266 hasIssue "1" @default.
- W2074865266 hasLocation W20748652661 @default.
- W2074865266 hasOpenAccess W2074865266 @default.
- W2074865266 hasPrimaryLocation W20748652661 @default.
- W2074865266 hasRelatedWork W1580797668 @default.
- W2074865266 hasRelatedWork W1991270174 @default.
- W2074865266 hasRelatedWork W2016727237 @default.
- W2074865266 hasRelatedWork W2038868688 @default.
- W2074865266 hasRelatedWork W2060095730 @default.
- W2074865266 hasRelatedWork W2080970762 @default.
- W2074865266 hasRelatedWork W2121983536 @default.
- W2074865266 hasRelatedWork W3042749926 @default.
- W2074865266 hasRelatedWork W3093893337 @default.
- W2074865266 hasRelatedWork W4244915563 @default.
- W2074865266 hasVolume "44" @default.
- W2074865266 isParatext "false" @default.
- W2074865266 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W2074865266 magId "2074865266" @default.
- W2074865266 workType "article" @default.