FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2074979907> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2074979907 endingPage "530" @default.
• W2074979907 startingPage "525" @default.
• W2074979907 abstract "This careful study compared videoconference visits with face-to-face visits in 30 established patients recruited from a general medicine practice. The video visit was followed immediately by a face-to-face visit. The patients preferred the face-to-face visit but were quite satisfied with the video visit. The physical examination was significantly less satisfactory in the video visit, but the ability to take a history and prescribe was not affected. The purpose of this pilot study is to investigate the feasibility, effectiveness, and acceptability of a patient-physician real-time encounter using videoconferencing technology (a virtual visit) compared to a face-to-face office visit in the general medical setting. The three broad aims of the study are (1) to compare the physician’s ability to make diagnoses in both settings, (2) to compare the physician’s ability to provide therapy in both settings, and (3) to examine both patient and physician satisfaction with both modalities. Thirty patients were recruited from a single practice to participate in the study. Patients were first interviewed and examined in the virtual setting, and then in the face-to-face setting. Both patients and physician were surveyed after each visit type with regard to quality of the history, quality of the examination, and satisfaction with the experience. The data were analyzed using two-tailed t-tests and analysis of variance. Patients significantly preferred the in-person visit (4.7 of 5), but were very satisfied with the virtual visit as well (4.1 of 5) (p < 0.0001) (scale: 1= poor, 2 = fair, 3 = good, 4 = very good, 5 = excellent). Physical examination effectiveness was significantly worse in the virtual visit modality (2.3 versus 4.9 for the face-to-face visit, p < 0.0001), but history and therapeutic effectiveness were not significantly different. Both patients and the physician felt comfortable with the technology: patients 4.1, physician 4.3. Results suggest that both patients and the physician found the virtual visit a potentially useful alternative to the traditional visit for many medical conditions. This may have significant implications for the general medical care environment. Patients may benefit from reduced opportunity costs associated with physician visits and clinicians may benefit from decrease overhead costs. Further research is ongoing to investigate the generalizability of these findings." @default.
• W2074979907 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2074979907 creator A5019533478 @default.
• W2074979907 creator A5026034059 @default.
• W2074979907 date "2008-08-01" @default.
• W2074979907 modified "2023-10-18" @default.
• W2074979907 title "Virtual Visits in a General Medicine Practice: A Pilot Study" @default.
• W2074979907 cites W1967516389 @default.
• W2074979907 cites W2024236102 @default.
• W2074979907 cites W2149883528 @default.
• W2074979907 cites W4233158638 @default.
• W2074979907 doi "https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2007.0101" @default.
• W2074979907 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18729750" @default.
• W2074979907 hasPublicationYear "2008" @default.
• W2074979907 type Work @default.
• W2074979907 sameAs 2074979907 @default.
• W2074979907 citedByCount "56" @default.
• W2074979907 countsByYear W20749799072012 @default.
• W2074979907 countsByYear W20749799072013 @default.
• W2074979907 countsByYear W20749799072014 @default.
• W2074979907 countsByYear W20749799072015 @default.
• W2074979907 countsByYear W20749799072016 @default.
• W2074979907 countsByYear W20749799072017 @default.
• W2074979907 countsByYear W20749799072018 @default.
• W2074979907 countsByYear W20749799072019 @default.
• W2074979907 countsByYear W20749799072020 @default.
• W2074979907 countsByYear W20749799072021 @default.
• W2074979907 countsByYear W20749799072022 @default.
• W2074979907 countsByYear W20749799072023 @default.
• W2074979907 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2074979907 hasAuthorship W2074979907A5019533478 @default.
• W2074979907 hasAuthorship W2074979907A5026034059 @default.
• W2074979907 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
• W2074979907 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W2074979907 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2074979907 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W2074979907 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W2074979907 hasConcept C159110408 @default.
• W2074979907 hasConcept C206179267 @default.
• W2074979907 hasConcept C22561748 @default.
• W2074979907 hasConcept C2775944032 @default.
• W2074979907 hasConcept C2777359053 @default.
• W2074979907 hasConcept C2778533338 @default.
• W2074979907 hasConcept C2779530757 @default.
• W2074979907 hasConcept C2779903281 @default.
• W2074979907 hasConcept C36289849 @default.
• W2074979907 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2074979907 hasConcept C49774154 @default.
• W2074979907 hasConcept C509550671 @default.
• W2074979907 hasConcept C512399662 @default.
• W2074979907 hasConcept C534262118 @default.
• W2074979907 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2074979907 hasConceptScore W2074979907C111472728 @default.
• W2074979907 hasConceptScore W2074979907C138885662 @default.
• W2074979907 hasConceptScore W2074979907C141071460 @default.
• W2074979907 hasConceptScore W2074979907C142724271 @default.
• W2074979907 hasConceptScore W2074979907C144024400 @default.
• W2074979907 hasConceptScore W2074979907C159110408 @default.
• W2074979907 hasConceptScore W2074979907C206179267 @default.
• W2074979907 hasConceptScore W2074979907C22561748 @default.
• W2074979907 hasConceptScore W2074979907C2775944032 @default.
• W2074979907 hasConceptScore W2074979907C2777359053 @default.
• W2074979907 hasConceptScore W2074979907C2778533338 @default.
• W2074979907 hasConceptScore W2074979907C2779530757 @default.
• W2074979907 hasConceptScore W2074979907C2779903281 @default.
• W2074979907 hasConceptScore W2074979907C36289849 @default.
• W2074979907 hasConceptScore W2074979907C41008148 @default.
• W2074979907 hasConceptScore W2074979907C49774154 @default.
• W2074979907 hasConceptScore W2074979907C509550671 @default.
• W2074979907 hasConceptScore W2074979907C512399662 @default.
• W2074979907 hasConceptScore W2074979907C534262118 @default.
• W2074979907 hasConceptScore W2074979907C71924100 @default.
• W2074979907 hasIssue "6" @default.
• W2074979907 hasLocation W20749799071 @default.
• W2074979907 hasLocation W20749799072 @default.
• W2074979907 hasOpenAccess W2074979907 @default.
• W2074979907 hasPrimaryLocation W20749799071 @default.
• W2074979907 hasRelatedWork W1979296670 @default.
• W2074979907 hasRelatedWork W1999518197 @default.
• W2074979907 hasRelatedWork W2011808192 @default.
• W2074979907 hasRelatedWork W2091100319 @default.
• W2074979907 hasRelatedWork W2213819692 @default.
• W2074979907 hasRelatedWork W2613400541 @default.
• W2074979907 hasRelatedWork W2886214291 @default.
• W2074979907 hasRelatedWork W4206687253 @default.
• W2074979907 hasRelatedWork W4313122503 @default.
• W2074979907 hasRelatedWork W4386698201 @default.
• W2074979907 hasVolume "14" @default.
• W2074979907 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2074979907 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2074979907 magId "2074979907" @default.
• W2074979907 workType "article" @default.