FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2075053350> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2075053350 endingPage "547" @default.
• W2075053350 startingPage "537" @default.
• W2075053350 abstract "Objectives The combination of prolapse surgery with an incontinence procedure can reduce the incidence of stress urinary incontinence ( SUI ) after surgery, but may increase adverse events. We compared the effectiveness and safety of prolapse surgery versus combined prolapse and incontinence surgery in women with pelvic organ prolapse. Design and setting Pubmed, EMBASE , DARE , the Cochrane Library and the register of Current Controlled Trials were searched for randomised trials (restricted to Burch colposuspension and midurethral sling as incontinence procedure) from 1995 to 2013 limited to the English literature. Methods Two reviewers selected eligible articles and extracted the data. Pooling for SUI was based on three patient groups: (1) women with coexisting SUI ; (2) women asymptomatic for SUI ; and (3) women with occult SUI . For adverse events, pooling was based on incontinence procedure. Main outcome measures The primary outcome was SUI . The secondary outcomes were treatment for SUI , bladder storage symptoms, obstructive voiding and adverse events. Results Seven trials were included. Pooling for women with coexisting SUI was possible for objective SUI with two studies and showed no difference. Statistical ( I 2 = 95%) and clinical heterogeneity was, however, high. The largest study showed a lower incidence of persisting SUI (5% versus 23%) and treatment for this (0% versus 57%) in women who underwent prolapse repair with a midurethral sling. The second study did not find a difference in women undergoing a sacrocolpopexy with or without Burch colposuspension. In asymptomatic women, combination surgery resulted in a lower incidence of de novo subjective SUI (two studies; 24% versus 41%; relative risk [ RR ], 0.6; 95% confidence interval [ CI ], 0.3–0.9; I 2 = 36%) and the need for subsequent anti‐incontinence surgery (three studies; 2% versus 7%; RR , 0.4; 95% CI , 0.2–0.8; I 2 = 13%). For the outcome objective SUI , pooling was possible for five studies, but statistical heterogeneity was high ( I 2 = 82%) and the difference was not statistically significant. In the subgroup of women with occult stress incontinence, we found a lower incidence of objective SUI after combination surgery (two studies; 22% versus 52%; RR , 0.4; 95% CI , 0.3–0.8; I 2 = 32%). There were no differences in bladder storage symptoms, urgency incontinence or long‐term obstructive voiding symptoms. Adverse events (two studies; 15% versus 10%; RR , 1.6; 95% CI , 1.0–2.5; I 2 = 0%) and prolonged catheterisation (three studies; 6% versus 1%; RR , 4.5; 95% CI , 1.5–13.3; I 2 = 0%) were more frequent after vaginal prolapse repair with a midurethral sling. Conclusions Combination surgery reduces the risk of postoperative stress incontinence, but short‐term voiding difficulties and adverse events were more frequent after combination surgery with a midurethral sling." @default.
• W2075053350 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2075053350 creator A5031776072 @default.
• W2075053350 creator A5041022535 @default.
• W2075053350 creator A5041635458 @default.
• W2075053350 creator A5045806296 @default.
• W2075053350 creator A5087850955 @default.
• W2075053350 date "2014-01-02" @default.
• W2075053350 modified "2023-10-17" @default.
• W2075053350 title "Prolapse surgery with or without stress incontinence surgery for pelvic organ prolapse: a systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomised trials" @default.
• W2075053350 cites W1965572207 @default.
• W2075053350 cites W1968743354 @default.
• W2075053350 cites W1969956769 @default.
• W2075053350 cites W1970539446 @default.
• W2075053350 cites W1970645608 @default.
• W2075053350 cites W1976765718 @default.
• W2075053350 cites W1976890255 @default.
• W2075053350 cites W1980626864 @default.
• W2075053350 cites W1982504332 @default.
• W2075053350 cites W1991947341 @default.
• W2075053350 cites W1994306343 @default.
• W2075053350 cites W1998250614 @default.
• W2075053350 cites W2003089222 @default.
• W2075053350 cites W2005221293 @default.
• W2075053350 cites W2009538928 @default.
• W2075053350 cites W2010596042 @default.
• W2075053350 cites W2016670963 @default.
• W2075053350 cites W2019649884 @default.
• W2075053350 cites W2020592590 @default.
• W2075053350 cites W2020655201 @default.
• W2075053350 cites W2040604491 @default.
• W2075053350 cites W2043845694 @default.
• W2075053350 cites W2046548044 @default.
• W2075053350 cites W2060031073 @default.
• W2075053350 cites W2071743186 @default.
• W2075053350 cites W2087960347 @default.
• W2075053350 cites W2087987153 @default.
• W2075053350 cites W2091985827 @default.
• W2075053350 cites W2098718880 @default.
• W2075053350 cites W2103371125 @default.
• W2075053350 cites W2105192970 @default.
• W2075053350 cites W2112290843 @default.
• W2075053350 cites W2123811240 @default.
• W2075053350 cites W2123840591 @default.
• W2075053350 cites W2127198252 @default.
• W2075053350 cites W2136161545 @default.
• W2075053350 cites W2142283594 @default.
• W2075053350 cites W2146191753 @default.
• W2075053350 cites W2153054592 @default.
• W2075053350 cites W2165561096 @default.
• W2075053350 cites W2330207891 @default.
• W2075053350 cites W2787962068 @default.
• W2075053350 cites W4238613472 @default.
• W2075053350 doi "https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.12509" @default.
• W2075053350 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24382099" @default.
• W2075053350 hasPublicationYear "2014" @default.
• W2075053350 type Work @default.
• W2075053350 sameAs 2075053350 @default.
• W2075053350 citedByCount "88" @default.
• W2075053350 countsByYear W20750533502014 @default.
• W2075053350 countsByYear W20750533502015 @default.
• W2075053350 countsByYear W20750533502016 @default.
• W2075053350 countsByYear W20750533502017 @default.
• W2075053350 countsByYear W20750533502018 @default.
• W2075053350 countsByYear W20750533502019 @default.
• W2075053350 countsByYear W20750533502020 @default.
• W2075053350 countsByYear W20750533502021 @default.
• W2075053350 countsByYear W20750533502022 @default.
• W2075053350 countsByYear W20750533502023 @default.
• W2075053350 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2075053350 hasAuthorship W2075053350A5031776072 @default.
• W2075053350 hasAuthorship W2075053350A5041022535 @default.
• W2075053350 hasAuthorship W2075053350A5041635458 @default.
• W2075053350 hasAuthorship W2075053350A5045806296 @default.
• W2075053350 hasAuthorship W2075053350A5087850955 @default.
• W2075053350 hasConcept C120665830 @default.
• W2075053350 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W2075053350 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2075053350 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2075053350 hasConcept C168563851 @default.
• W2075053350 hasConcept C178103971 @default.
• W2075053350 hasConcept C197934379 @default.
• W2075053350 hasConcept C2777910003 @default.
• W2075053350 hasConcept C2778531004 @default.
• W2075053350 hasConcept C2779523193 @default.
• W2075053350 hasConcept C29456083 @default.
• W2075053350 hasConcept C61511704 @default.
• W2075053350 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2075053350 hasConcept C95190672 @default.
• W2075053350 hasConceptScore W2075053350C120665830 @default.
• W2075053350 hasConceptScore W2075053350C121332964 @default.
• W2075053350 hasConceptScore W2075053350C126322002 @default.
• W2075053350 hasConceptScore W2075053350C141071460 @default.
• W2075053350 hasConceptScore W2075053350C168563851 @default.
• W2075053350 hasConceptScore W2075053350C178103971 @default.
• W2075053350 hasConceptScore W2075053350C197934379 @default.
• W2075053350 hasConceptScore W2075053350C2777910003 @default.
• W2075053350 hasConceptScore W2075053350C2778531004 @default.

• next