FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2075322857> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2075322857 endingPage "319" @default.
• W2075322857 startingPage "312" @default.
• W2075322857 abstract "Abstract Background: Practice tools, such as patienthandouts, pocket cards, and documentationforms, can help pharmacists initiate practicechange and improve routine care provided topatients. In this project, 5 practice tools weredesigned to help pharmacists improve theirusual care of patients with diabetes. Methods:A group of practising pharmacists wasinvited to use the practice tools and report ontheir feasibility. Participants met with theresearchers, were introduced to the practicetools, and were asked to field-test the tools. Theywere encouraged to use each tool at least 3 times,and were asked to complete a tool report formeach time they used a tool.Results: Eight pharmacists, primarily from com-munity practice, tested the diabetes tools. Par-ticipants completed each tool report form atleast once, for a total of 51 reports. Participantstook an average of 6 minutes to use the tools.The longest mean time required to use a toolwas 9 minutes, and the shortest was 4 minutes.Participants indicated that they would use thetools again. In 76% of tool uses, participantsfound the tools “easy” or “very easy” to use. Formost tool uses, participants indicated that thepatient was receptive (77%) and the tool fulfilledits purpose (73%). When asked to rate theiroverall experience with the practice tools, mostparticipants (71%) strongly agreed that thesetools would help them communicate with theirpatients and they liked the fact that they couldphotocopy them. Conclusion: A select group of pharmacists werewilling to test diabetes practice tools in theirworkplace, and several continued to use themin their practice during the following year.When practice tools fit with pharmacists’ cur-rent roles, they are more likely to be used. Itmay be particularly challenging to help phar-macists use tools that support innovative andunfamiliar practices. Further research is neededto determine the use of tools in other practicesettings, the impact of tools on the manner inwhich pharmacists deliver patient care, the levelof pharmacist support needed to facilitate toolimplementation, and the impact of tool use onpatients’ economic, clinical, and humanisticoutcomes." @default.
• W2075322857 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2075322857 creator A5036411845 @default.
• W2075322857 creator A5067514299 @default.
• W2075322857 creator A5087339027 @default.
• W2075322857 creator A5088806758 @default.
• W2075322857 date "2007-09-01" @default.
• W2075322857 modified "2023-09-25" @default.
• W2075322857 title "Evaluating pharmacists' experience using diabetes practice tools: A pilot study" @default.
• W2075322857 cites W1587306107 @default.
• W2075322857 cites W2000987038 @default.
• W2075322857 cites W2006113200 @default.
• W2075322857 cites W2025526340 @default.
• W2075322857 cites W2095570152 @default.
• W2075322857 cites W2105203857 @default.
• W2075322857 cites W2125596383 @default.
• W2075322857 cites W2161137968 @default.
• W2075322857 cites W2163302849 @default.
• W2075322857 cites W2314967576 @default.
• W2075322857 cites W2337454357 @default.
• W2075322857 cites W2769264260 @default.
• W2075322857 cites W4256431271 @default.
• W2075322857 cites W51997267 @default.
• W2075322857 doi "https://doi.org/10.3821/1913-701x(2007)140[312:epeudp]2.0.co;2" @default.
• W2075322857 hasPublicationYear "2007" @default.
• W2075322857 type Work @default.
• W2075322857 sameAs 2075322857 @default.
• W2075322857 citedByCount "1" @default.
• W2075322857 countsByYear W20753228572015 @default.
• W2075322857 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2075322857 hasAuthorship W2075322857A5036411845 @default.
• W2075322857 hasAuthorship W2075322857A5067514299 @default.
• W2075322857 hasAuthorship W2075322857A5087339027 @default.
• W2075322857 hasAuthorship W2075322857A5088806758 @default.
• W2075322857 hasConcept C134018914 @default.
• W2075322857 hasConcept C19527891 @default.
• W2075322857 hasConcept C555293320 @default.
• W2075322857 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2075322857 hasConceptScore W2075322857C134018914 @default.
• W2075322857 hasConceptScore W2075322857C19527891 @default.
• W2075322857 hasConceptScore W2075322857C555293320 @default.
• W2075322857 hasConceptScore W2075322857C71924100 @default.
• W2075322857 hasIssue "5" @default.
• W2075322857 hasLocation W20753228571 @default.
• W2075322857 hasOpenAccess W2075322857 @default.
• W2075322857 hasPrimaryLocation W20753228571 @default.
• W2075322857 hasRelatedWork W1563850031 @default.
• W2075322857 hasRelatedWork W2032287785 @default.
• W2075322857 hasRelatedWork W2094113608 @default.
• W2075322857 hasRelatedWork W2167444163 @default.
• W2075322857 hasRelatedWork W2233866314 @default.
• W2075322857 hasRelatedWork W2374391052 @default.
• W2075322857 hasRelatedWork W2383009242 @default.
• W2075322857 hasRelatedWork W2415759662 @default.
• W2075322857 hasRelatedWork W3036934084 @default.
• W2075322857 hasRelatedWork W88627568 @default.
• W2075322857 hasVolume "140" @default.
• W2075322857 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2075322857 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2075322857 magId "2075322857" @default.
• W2075322857 workType "article" @default.