FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2075376725> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2075376725 endingPage "237" @default.
• W2075376725 startingPage "213" @default.
• W2075376725 abstract "Purpose During past ten years China and India have emerged as the favorite destination for R&D investment. In this paper a comparative evaluation of the process of technology development in China and India is carried out. The objective is to identify the rate of growth of technology and the patterns of development in different technology sectors. Design/methodology/approach The analysis is based on the tangible, measurable and recorded output of the technology development process – namely grant of patents. The authors have used US patents as the surrogate measure for the technological output between 1992 to 2007. The authors obtained data on inventor's background, ownership pattern of the patents, as well as technology sectors and descriptive statistics are used to compare the trends between the two countries. Findings The paper finds that both China and India have achieved very high growth rates in patents granted with some resident research between 1992 and 2007. Both have a high percentage of foreign‐owned and low percentage of joint ownership of patents. Also, a clear polarization in the composition of research teams is detected in both China and India in that international researcher teams have largely been used only for foreign and jointly owned patents. The authors find that corporations have become much more active in recent years in patenting and multi national companies have led the local companies in patent development across many sectors. The authors also detect some significant differences in the Chinese and Indian pursuit of patent development. About 30 to 35 percent of all patents developed in China are design patents – the rest being utility patents. For India almost all such patents – more than 95 percent – are utility patents. The authors find a clear dominance along the mechanical trajectory among the patents developed in China, while for India a similar dominance is along the chemical trajectory that includes pharmaceuticals and biotechnology. Another interesting finding is the growing share of ICT patents in both China and India, particularly in the last few years China has emerged ahead of India in terms of its patent development as well as in the internationalization of its patent development as reflected in the ownership of patents developed. However, even for foreign patents developed in these countries, researcher collaboration is showing a downward trend. Originality/value This paper carries out a comparative evaluation of the process of technology development in China and India. The analysis is based on the tangible, measurable and recorded output of the technology development process – namely grant of patents. The paper uses US patents as the surrogate measure for the technological output from China and India." @default.
• W2075376725 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2075376725 creator A5003894189 @default.
• W2075376725 creator A5017525850 @default.
• W2075376725 creator A5043773463 @default.
• W2075376725 date "2009-10-09" @default.
• W2075376725 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W2075376725 title "Technology development in China and India: a comparative evaluation" @default.
• W2075376725 cites W1561438477 @default.
• W2075376725 cites W1568354448 @default.
• W2075376725 cites W1906944042 @default.
• W2075376725 cites W1982424431 @default.
• W2075376725 cites W1985619075 @default.
• W2075376725 cites W1989446429 @default.
• W2075376725 cites W1994814777 @default.
• W2075376725 cites W1998445893 @default.
• W2075376725 cites W2007376129 @default.
• W2075376725 cites W2046890673 @default.
• W2075376725 cites W2083856790 @default.
• W2075376725 cites W2111300188 @default.
• W2075376725 cites W3126001644 @default.
• W2075376725 cites W4230970959 @default.
• W2075376725 doi "https://doi.org/10.1108/17554190911013292" @default.
• W2075376725 hasPublicationYear "2009" @default.
• W2075376725 type Work @default.
• W2075376725 sameAs 2075376725 @default.
• W2075376725 citedByCount "9" @default.
• W2075376725 countsByYear W20753767252014 @default.
• W2075376725 countsByYear W20753767252015 @default.
• W2075376725 countsByYear W20753767252016 @default.
• W2075376725 countsByYear W20753767252017 @default.
• W2075376725 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2075376725 hasAuthorship W2075376725A5003894189 @default.
• W2075376725 hasAuthorship W2075376725A5017525850 @default.
• W2075376725 hasAuthorship W2075376725A5043773463 @default.
• W2075376725 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
• W2075376725 hasConcept C117671659 @default.
• W2075376725 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W2075376725 hasConcept C139719470 @default.
• W2075376725 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W2075376725 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W2075376725 hasConcept C162853370 @default.
• W2075376725 hasConcept C166957645 @default.
• W2075376725 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2075376725 hasConcept C191935318 @default.
• W2075376725 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2075376725 hasConcept C205649164 @default.
• W2075376725 hasConcept C27548731 @default.
• W2075376725 hasConcept C2988118331 @default.
• W2075376725 hasConcept C33842695 @default.
• W2075376725 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W2075376725 hasConcept C39896193 @default.
• W2075376725 hasConcept C50522688 @default.
• W2075376725 hasConcept C94625758 @default.
• W2075376725 hasConceptScore W2075376725C105795698 @default.
• W2075376725 hasConceptScore W2075376725C117671659 @default.
• W2075376725 hasConceptScore W2075376725C127413603 @default.
• W2075376725 hasConceptScore W2075376725C139719470 @default.
• W2075376725 hasConceptScore W2075376725C144133560 @default.
• W2075376725 hasConceptScore W2075376725C162324750 @default.
• W2075376725 hasConceptScore W2075376725C162853370 @default.
• W2075376725 hasConceptScore W2075376725C166957645 @default.
• W2075376725 hasConceptScore W2075376725C17744445 @default.
• W2075376725 hasConceptScore W2075376725C191935318 @default.
• W2075376725 hasConceptScore W2075376725C199539241 @default.
• W2075376725 hasConceptScore W2075376725C205649164 @default.
• W2075376725 hasConceptScore W2075376725C27548731 @default.
• W2075376725 hasConceptScore W2075376725C2988118331 @default.
• W2075376725 hasConceptScore W2075376725C33842695 @default.
• W2075376725 hasConceptScore W2075376725C33923547 @default.
• W2075376725 hasConceptScore W2075376725C39896193 @default.
• W2075376725 hasConceptScore W2075376725C50522688 @default.
• W2075376725 hasConceptScore W2075376725C94625758 @default.
• W2075376725 hasIssue "4" @default.
• W2075376725 hasLocation W20753767251 @default.
• W2075376725 hasOpenAccess W2075376725 @default.
• W2075376725 hasPrimaryLocation W20753767251 @default.
• W2075376725 hasRelatedWork W1592383871 @default.
• W2075376725 hasRelatedWork W2014723396 @default.
• W2075376725 hasRelatedWork W2056762839 @default.
• W2075376725 hasRelatedWork W2092735512 @default.
• W2075376725 hasRelatedWork W2128485870 @default.
• W2075376725 hasRelatedWork W2365607114 @default.
• W2075376725 hasRelatedWork W2379484597 @default.
• W2075376725 hasRelatedWork W2393734241 @default.
• W2075376725 hasRelatedWork W3124134169 @default.
• W2075376725 hasRelatedWork W395145186 @default.
• W2075376725 hasVolume "1" @default.
• W2075376725 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2075376725 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2075376725 magId "2075376725" @default.
• W2075376725 workType "article" @default.