Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2076228267> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 83 of
83
with 100 items per page.
- W2076228267 endingPage "360" @default.
- W2076228267 startingPage "356" @default.
- W2076228267 abstract "To compare the histomorphologic and colposcopic results of cold knife conization and loop excision.Sixty-six women were randomly allocated to have the cone specimen removed by cold knife excision (n = 38) or loop excision (n = 28). Subjects eligible for inclusion were those who presented histologically verified grade 3 cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) or grade 2 CIN with squamocolumnar junction not seen.The mean height of the cone specimens was greater in the cold knife group [18.9 mm (SD = 5. 5) and 12.8 mm (SD = 4.3), respectively; P = 0.0001], as was the frequency of clear margins (100 and 80%, respectively; P = 0.001). In the loop excision group, thermal injuries were present in half of the cone sections. The median (range) thickness of thermal injury was 0.98 mm (0-1.5 mm) in the ectocervix and 0.95 mm (0-1.75 mm) in the endocervix. Histologic evaluation of the endocervical margins was not possible in 2 cases (7%). At follow-up colposcopy, evaluation of the entire squamocolumnar junction was possible in 15 (39%) and 20 (71%) women, respectively (P < 0.01). Four patients in the cold knife group and 6 in the loop group had histologically confirmed persistent dysplasia (P > 0.05), yielding success rates of 90 and 79%, respectively (P > 0.05).Loop excision provides a sample that is adequate for histologic evaluation in most cases, results in the same success rate as cold knife conization, and allows optimal colposcopic surveillance in significantly more cases than cold knife excision." @default.
- W2076228267 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W2076228267 creator A5014822595 @default.
- W2076228267 creator A5017819841 @default.
- W2076228267 creator A5020037049 @default.
- W2076228267 creator A5024880435 @default.
- W2076228267 creator A5046541916 @default.
- W2076228267 creator A5065974579 @default.
- W2076228267 date "1999-12-01" @default.
- W2076228267 modified "2023-09-25" @default.
- W2076228267 title "Randomized Study Comparing Two Techniques of Conization: Cold Knife versus Loop Excision" @default.
- W2076228267 cites W2004745857 @default.
- W2076228267 cites W2015554185 @default.
- W2076228267 cites W2027390624 @default.
- W2076228267 cites W2028757010 @default.
- W2076228267 cites W2031122869 @default.
- W2076228267 cites W2042248493 @default.
- W2076228267 cites W2049104331 @default.
- W2076228267 cites W2079630074 @default.
- W2076228267 cites W2113696328 @default.
- W2076228267 doi "https://doi.org/10.1006/gyno.1999.5626" @default.
- W2076228267 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10600289" @default.
- W2076228267 hasPublicationYear "1999" @default.
- W2076228267 type Work @default.
- W2076228267 sameAs 2076228267 @default.
- W2076228267 citedByCount "43" @default.
- W2076228267 countsByYear W20762282672012 @default.
- W2076228267 countsByYear W20762282672013 @default.
- W2076228267 countsByYear W20762282672014 @default.
- W2076228267 countsByYear W20762282672015 @default.
- W2076228267 countsByYear W20762282672016 @default.
- W2076228267 countsByYear W20762282672017 @default.
- W2076228267 countsByYear W20762282672018 @default.
- W2076228267 countsByYear W20762282672020 @default.
- W2076228267 countsByYear W20762282672021 @default.
- W2076228267 countsByYear W20762282672022 @default.
- W2076228267 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2076228267 hasAuthorship W2076228267A5014822595 @default.
- W2076228267 hasAuthorship W2076228267A5017819841 @default.
- W2076228267 hasAuthorship W2076228267A5020037049 @default.
- W2076228267 hasAuthorship W2076228267A5024880435 @default.
- W2076228267 hasAuthorship W2076228267A5046541916 @default.
- W2076228267 hasAuthorship W2076228267A5065974579 @default.
- W2076228267 hasConcept C121608353 @default.
- W2076228267 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
- W2076228267 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
- W2076228267 hasConcept C2775894508 @default.
- W2076228267 hasConcept C2776117191 @default.
- W2076228267 hasConcept C2777343196 @default.
- W2076228267 hasConcept C2778220009 @default.
- W2076228267 hasConcept C2780742577 @default.
- W2076228267 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W2076228267 hasConceptScore W2076228267C121608353 @default.
- W2076228267 hasConceptScore W2076228267C126322002 @default.
- W2076228267 hasConceptScore W2076228267C141071460 @default.
- W2076228267 hasConceptScore W2076228267C2775894508 @default.
- W2076228267 hasConceptScore W2076228267C2776117191 @default.
- W2076228267 hasConceptScore W2076228267C2777343196 @default.
- W2076228267 hasConceptScore W2076228267C2778220009 @default.
- W2076228267 hasConceptScore W2076228267C2780742577 @default.
- W2076228267 hasConceptScore W2076228267C71924100 @default.
- W2076228267 hasIssue "3" @default.
- W2076228267 hasLocation W20762282671 @default.
- W2076228267 hasLocation W20762282672 @default.
- W2076228267 hasOpenAccess W2076228267 @default.
- W2076228267 hasPrimaryLocation W20762282671 @default.
- W2076228267 hasRelatedWork W1966289441 @default.
- W2076228267 hasRelatedWork W197244745 @default.
- W2076228267 hasRelatedWork W1991048910 @default.
- W2076228267 hasRelatedWork W2024032547 @default.
- W2076228267 hasRelatedWork W2275778052 @default.
- W2076228267 hasRelatedWork W2411009320 @default.
- W2076228267 hasRelatedWork W2412410882 @default.
- W2076228267 hasRelatedWork W2413884042 @default.
- W2076228267 hasRelatedWork W2417662031 @default.
- W2076228267 hasRelatedWork W2593836422 @default.
- W2076228267 hasVolume "75" @default.
- W2076228267 isParatext "false" @default.
- W2076228267 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W2076228267 magId "2076228267" @default.
- W2076228267 workType "article" @default.