FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2076285093> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2076285093 endingPage "24" @default.
• W2076285093 startingPage "8" @default.
• W2076285093 abstract "The relationship between teachers' judgments of students' academic achievement and students' performances on an achievement test was investigated. The major questions examined were: (a) How accurate are teachers' ratings of students' academic achievement? (b) What is the relationship between teachers' judgments, as operationalized by item predictions on a standardized achievement test, and students' actual performances on an achievement test? (c) Does a student's educational status, high-achieving versus low-achieving, affect the accuracy of teachers' judgments? The study included 12 teachers who volunteered to participate, and 47 students randomly selected from Wisconsin public schools. The students consisted of 30 females and 17 males, ranging from first- to fourthgrade levels. Teachers filled out the Academic Competence Scale from the Social Skills Rating System-Teacher version (Gresham & Elliott, 1990) and one questionnaire for each student. The questionnaire, developed by the authors of the current study, required teachers to predict how students would do on each item of the Kaufman Test of Educational Achievement, Brief form (K-TEA; Kaufman & Kaufman, 1985). Students were then administered the K-TEA by a qualified examiner. Teachers' judgments of students' academic achievement on the Academic Competence Scale were correlated moderately high (r = .70) with students' actual K-TEA scores. Furthermore, mean percent agreement between teachers' item predictions and students' actual performances on the K-TEA was moderately high (79%) (Kappa-coefficient of 67%). Lastly, there was partial support for the prediction that teachers were better predictors of higher-achieving than lower-achieving students. Analyses demonstrated a slightly higher percent agreement between teachers and students with above-average K-TEA scores (81 %) than between teachers and students with below-average K-TEA scores (77%). This article concludes with a discussion of the practical implications of these findings for psychologists conducting academic assessments." @default.
• W2076285093 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2076285093 creator A5053605630 @default.
• W2076285093 creator A5081952500 @default.
• W2076285093 date "1998-01-01" @default.
• W2076285093 modified "2023-10-14" @default.
• W2076285093 title "Teachers' judgments of students' academic functioning: A comparison of actual and predicted performances." @default.
• W2076285093 cites W137862887 @default.
• W2076285093 cites W1483112721 @default.
• W2076285093 cites W151057870 @default.
• W2076285093 cites W1964992049 @default.
• W2076285093 cites W1966420917 @default.
• W2076285093 cites W1990908253 @default.
• W2076285093 cites W1991142165 @default.
• W2076285093 cites W1994804072 @default.
• W2076285093 cites W1996845496 @default.
• W2076285093 cites W1996955162 @default.
• W2076285093 cites W2006267271 @default.
• W2076285093 cites W2013948243 @default.
• W2076285093 cites W2038921358 @default.
• W2076285093 cites W2039234455 @default.
• W2076285093 cites W2047222180 @default.
• W2076285093 cites W2056512440 @default.
• W2076285093 cites W2064396657 @default.
• W2076285093 cites W2075689187 @default.
• W2076285093 cites W2079655599 @default.
• W2076285093 cites W2095167726 @default.
• W2076285093 cites W2111985766 @default.
• W2076285093 cites W2118164945 @default.
• W2076285093 cites W2160179841 @default.
• W2076285093 cites W2165058121 @default.
• W2076285093 cites W2727180577 @default.
• W2076285093 cites W2733707029 @default.
• W2076285093 doi "https://doi.org/10.1037/h0088969" @default.
• W2076285093 hasPublicationYear "1998" @default.
• W2076285093 type Work @default.
• W2076285093 sameAs 2076285093 @default.
• W2076285093 citedByCount "142" @default.
• W2076285093 countsByYear W20762850932012 @default.
• W2076285093 countsByYear W20762850932013 @default.
• W2076285093 countsByYear W20762850932014 @default.
• W2076285093 countsByYear W20762850932015 @default.
• W2076285093 countsByYear W20762850932016 @default.
• W2076285093 countsByYear W20762850932017 @default.
• W2076285093 countsByYear W20762850932018 @default.
• W2076285093 countsByYear W20762850932019 @default.
• W2076285093 countsByYear W20762850932020 @default.
• W2076285093 countsByYear W20762850932021 @default.
• W2076285093 countsByYear W20762850932022 @default.
• W2076285093 countsByYear W20762850932023 @default.
• W2076285093 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2076285093 hasAuthorship W2076285093A5053605630 @default.
• W2076285093 hasAuthorship W2076285093A5081952500 @default.
• W2076285093 hasConcept C145420912 @default.
• W2076285093 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2076285093 hasConcept C2781206393 @default.
• W2076285093 hasConcept C75630572 @default.
• W2076285093 hasConceptScore W2076285093C145420912 @default.
• W2076285093 hasConceptScore W2076285093C15744967 @default.
• W2076285093 hasConceptScore W2076285093C2781206393 @default.
• W2076285093 hasConceptScore W2076285093C75630572 @default.
• W2076285093 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W2076285093 hasLocation W20762850931 @default.
• W2076285093 hasOpenAccess W2076285093 @default.
• W2076285093 hasPrimaryLocation W20762850931 @default.
• W2076285093 hasRelatedWork W1999504618 @default.
• W2076285093 hasRelatedWork W2123529469 @default.
• W2076285093 hasRelatedWork W2125669077 @default.
• W2076285093 hasRelatedWork W2136525902 @default.
• W2076285093 hasRelatedWork W2324716222 @default.
• W2076285093 hasRelatedWork W2367638453 @default.
• W2076285093 hasRelatedWork W2372770114 @default.
• W2076285093 hasRelatedWork W2587817805 @default.
• W2076285093 hasRelatedWork W2626081181 @default.
• W2076285093 hasRelatedWork W3210620913 @default.
• W2076285093 hasVolume "13" @default.
• W2076285093 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2076285093 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2076285093 magId "2076285093" @default.
• W2076285093 workType "article" @default.