FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2076368577> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2076368577 endingPage "263" @default.
• W2076368577 startingPage "259" @default.
• W2076368577 abstract "Last year at the meeting of the National Conference in Ethics in Human Research (NCEHR), I discussed three aspects of research ethics and research integrity in relation to journal publishing. These were: conflict of interest; research ethics approval and research funding. This year, I want to reflect on the challenge of research integrity and journal publishing more broadly as well as discuss how these issues have changed over the past thirty years that I have been involved in journal editing. In revising this paper from the discussion at the NCEHR conference this year, I have included reference to the very helpful Singapore Statement on Research Integrity approved this past summer at the Second World Conference on Research Integrity. I begin with the first case of journal misconduct that I dealt with in the 1980s. An article that was co-authored was sent to one of the journals that I was editing. It was duly blindrefereed and accepted for publication. When it appeared in print, another academic contacted the journal saying that the first 5–6 pages of the article were identical to her article which had appeared in another scholarly journal two years previously. She then faxed her article which was as she had described it. Dealing with the co-authors was complex and unpleasant. One co-author immediately hired a lawyer who sent threatening letters, suggesting both suits to the publisher and personally to me and the editor-in-chief. The other author, among other things, suggested that he had not written any part of the article and that his co-author had forged his signature on the consent to publish form that all authors were required to sign prior to publication. Upon contacting the Vice-President Academic at his university, we discovered that he had included this article on his resume when he applied for promotion. One of the authors blamed his graduate student for being sloppy in entering material that he had only intended to quote and somehow this material had inadvertently been included in the article without due references. I could go on but the behaviour is clear. There was denial, threat, blaming others and deceit involved. There was never any adequate explanation of how a significant part of the article that we accepted was identical to the work of another author that had been published by another scholarly journal two years previously. J Acad Ethics (2010) 8:259–263 DOI 10.1007/s10805-010-9126-8" @default.
• W2076368577 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2076368577 creator A5036480203 @default.
• W2076368577 date "2010-12-01" @default.
• W2076368577 modified "2023-09-28" @default.
• W2076368577 title "Reflections on the Relationship of Research Integrity to Research Ethics in Publishing" @default.
• W2076368577 doi "https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-010-9126-8" @default.
• W2076368577 hasPublicationYear "2010" @default.
• W2076368577 type Work @default.
• W2076368577 sameAs 2076368577 @default.
• W2076368577 citedByCount "8" @default.
• W2076368577 countsByYear W20763685772012 @default.
• W2076368577 countsByYear W20763685772013 @default.
• W2076368577 countsByYear W20763685772016 @default.
• W2076368577 countsByYear W20763685772019 @default.
• W2076368577 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2076368577 hasAuthorship W2076368577A5036480203 @default.
• W2076368577 hasBestOaLocation W20763685771 @default.
• W2076368577 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
• W2076368577 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W2076368577 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W2076368577 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W2076368577 hasConcept C151719136 @default.
• W2076368577 hasConcept C153997805 @default.
• W2076368577 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2076368577 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2076368577 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2076368577 hasConcept C2779390046 @default.
• W2076368577 hasConcept C2994190893 @default.
• W2076368577 hasConcept C39549134 @default.
• W2076368577 hasConcept C55587333 @default.
• W2076368577 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
• W2076368577 hasConceptScore W2076368577C111472728 @default.
• W2076368577 hasConceptScore W2076368577C127413603 @default.
• W2076368577 hasConceptScore W2076368577C138885662 @default.
• W2076368577 hasConceptScore W2076368577C144024400 @default.
• W2076368577 hasConceptScore W2076368577C151719136 @default.
• W2076368577 hasConceptScore W2076368577C153997805 @default.
• W2076368577 hasConceptScore W2076368577C15744967 @default.
• W2076368577 hasConceptScore W2076368577C17744445 @default.
• W2076368577 hasConceptScore W2076368577C199539241 @default.
• W2076368577 hasConceptScore W2076368577C2779390046 @default.
• W2076368577 hasConceptScore W2076368577C2994190893 @default.
• W2076368577 hasConceptScore W2076368577C39549134 @default.
• W2076368577 hasConceptScore W2076368577C55587333 @default.
• W2076368577 hasConceptScore W2076368577C77805123 @default.
• W2076368577 hasIssue "4" @default.
• W2076368577 hasLocation W20763685771 @default.
• W2076368577 hasOpenAccess W2076368577 @default.
• W2076368577 hasPrimaryLocation W20763685771 @default.
• W2076368577 hasRelatedWork W2342140212 @default.
• W2076368577 hasRelatedWork W2342855595 @default.
• W2076368577 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
• W2076368577 hasRelatedWork W2795255987 @default.
• W2076368577 hasRelatedWork W3210137649 @default.
• W2076368577 hasRelatedWork W4287218651 @default.
• W2076368577 hasRelatedWork W4310376775 @default.
• W2076368577 hasRelatedWork W4380479869 @default.
• W2076368577 hasRelatedWork W2560873500 @default.
• W2076368577 hasRelatedWork W3128006206 @default.
• W2076368577 hasVolume "8" @default.
• W2076368577 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2076368577 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2076368577 magId "2076368577" @default.
• W2076368577 workType "article" @default.