FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2076403048> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2076403048 endingPage "1534" @default.
• W2076403048 startingPage "1530" @default.
• W2076403048 abstract "To assess the accuracy of the diagnosis of tubal occlusion with the use of color Doppler flow ultrasonography and hysterosalpingography, 129 infertile women were studied. All 129 women had the procedure performed with an ATL Ultramark 9 (Advanced Technology Laboratories, Bothel, Wash.) color Doppler ultrasonography machine. Eighty-five of the 129 women also had an additional study including x-ray hysterosalpingography and/or chromopertubation. Of these 85 women, 58 had pelviscopic examination with chromopertubation. The frequency of diagnosis of tubal occlusion was compared among the three methods. When results of ultrasonography-hysterosalpingography were compared with those of x-ray hysterosalpingography and/or chromopertubation, 69 of 85 (81%) studies showed agreement, and 50 of 58 (86%) ultrasonography-hysterosalpingography findings agreed with observations at chromopertubation. The frequency of comparable findings between x-ray hysterosalpingography and chromopertubation is 75%. These data suggest that ultrasonography-hysterosalpingography is at least as accurate as x-ray hysterosalpingography in diagnosing tubal occlusion. In addition, ultrasonography-hysterosalpingography is safer and more cost-effective than x-ray hysterosalpingography and chromopertubation. To assess the accuracy of the diagnosis of tubal occlusion with the use of color Doppler flow ultrasonography and hysterosalpingography, 129 infertile women were studied. All 129 women had the procedure performed with an ATL Ultramark 9 (Advanced Technology Laboratories, Bothel, Wash.) color Doppler ultrasonography machine. Eighty-five of the 129 women also had an additional study including x-ray hysterosalpingography and/or chromopertubation. Of these 85 women, 58 had pelviscopic examination with chromopertubation. The frequency of diagnosis of tubal occlusion was compared among the three methods. When results of ultrasonography-hysterosalpingography were compared with those of x-ray hysterosalpingography and/or chromopertubation, 69 of 85 (81%) studies showed agreement, and 50 of 58 (86%) ultrasonography-hysterosalpingography findings agreed with observations at chromopertubation. The frequency of comparable findings between x-ray hysterosalpingography and chromopertubation is 75%. These data suggest that ultrasonography-hysterosalpingography is at least as accurate as x-ray hysterosalpingography in diagnosing tubal occlusion. In addition, ultrasonography-hysterosalpingography is safer and more cost-effective than x-ray hysterosalpingography and chromopertubation." @default.
• W2076403048 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2076403048 creator A5022083591 @default.
• W2076403048 creator A5046405629 @default.
• W2076403048 date "1991-06-01" @default.
• W2076403048 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W2076403048 title "Hysterosalpingography with color Doppler ultrasonography" @default.
• W2076403048 cites W2148759003 @default.
• W2076403048 cites W2398215183 @default.
• W2076403048 cites W2414862966 @default.
• W2076403048 cites W2414893462 @default.
• W2076403048 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9378(91)91432-v" @default.
• W2076403048 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2048599" @default.
• W2076403048 hasPublicationYear "1991" @default.
• W2076403048 type Work @default.
• W2076403048 sameAs 2076403048 @default.
• W2076403048 citedByCount "33" @default.
• W2076403048 countsByYear W20764030482012 @default.
• W2076403048 countsByYear W20764030482017 @default.
• W2076403048 countsByYear W20764030482020 @default.
• W2076403048 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2076403048 hasAuthorship W2076403048A5022083591 @default.
• W2076403048 hasAuthorship W2076403048A5046405629 @default.
• W2076403048 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
• W2076403048 hasConcept C2777688143 @default.
• W2076403048 hasConcept C2779234561 @default.
• W2076403048 hasConcept C2779492760 @default.
• W2076403048 hasConcept C529618451 @default.
• W2076403048 hasConcept C54355233 @default.
• W2076403048 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2076403048 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2076403048 hasConceptScore W2076403048C126838900 @default.
• W2076403048 hasConceptScore W2076403048C2777688143 @default.
• W2076403048 hasConceptScore W2076403048C2779234561 @default.
• W2076403048 hasConceptScore W2076403048C2779492760 @default.
• W2076403048 hasConceptScore W2076403048C529618451 @default.
• W2076403048 hasConceptScore W2076403048C54355233 @default.
• W2076403048 hasConceptScore W2076403048C71924100 @default.
• W2076403048 hasConceptScore W2076403048C86803240 @default.
• W2076403048 hasIssue "6" @default.
• W2076403048 hasLocation W20764030481 @default.
• W2076403048 hasLocation W20764030482 @default.
• W2076403048 hasOpenAccess W2076403048 @default.
• W2076403048 hasPrimaryLocation W20764030481 @default.
• W2076403048 hasRelatedWork W1980174677 @default.
• W2076403048 hasRelatedWork W2049214470 @default.
• W2076403048 hasRelatedWork W2339862855 @default.
• W2076403048 hasRelatedWork W2348665213 @default.
• W2076403048 hasRelatedWork W2354828478 @default.
• W2076403048 hasRelatedWork W2355170027 @default.
• W2076403048 hasRelatedWork W2383988748 @default.
• W2076403048 hasRelatedWork W2405104912 @default.
• W2076403048 hasRelatedWork W4233064811 @default.
• W2076403048 hasRelatedWork W4237473907 @default.
• W2076403048 hasVolume "164" @default.
• W2076403048 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2076403048 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2076403048 magId "2076403048" @default.
• W2076403048 workType "article" @default.