Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2076465416> ?p ?o ?g. }
- W2076465416 endingPage "162" @default.
- W2076465416 startingPage "150" @default.
- W2076465416 abstract "1 The impacts of habitat disturbance on biodiversity within tropical forests are an area of current concern but are poorly understood and difficult to predict. This is due in part to a poor understanding of how species respond to natural variation in environmental conditions within primary forest and how these conditions alter following anthropogenic disturbance. Within this context, the main aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that the gap and shade preferences of fruit-feeding butterflies in primary forest in northern Borneo can be used to predict species’ responses to selective logging and thus explain changes in diversity and geographical distinctness in relation to habitat disturbance. 2 Overall, there was little difference in butterfly diversity between primary forest and forest that had been selectively logged 10–12 years previously. In contrast, there were marked differences in the composition of the butterfly assemblages in the two habitats, which were strongly associated with species’ gap preferences and geographical distributions. In Satyrinae and Morphinae, those species with higher shade preferences and narrower geographical distributions were most adversely affected by logging, whereas cosmopolitan species with high light preferences benefited from logging. In Nymphalinae and Charaxinae the opposite was observed: those species with wider geographical distributions were adversely affected and those species with relatively restricted distributions were more common in logged forest. 3 These changes in butterfly assemblages were associated with changes in vegetation structure following selective logging, which resulted in much lower habitat heterogeneity with less dense shade and fewer open gaps in logged forest. Areas of dense shade, which were more common in unlogged forest, supported species of Satyrinae and Morphinae with restricted geographical distributions, whereas open gaps, which were also more common in unlogged forest, attracted widespread species of Nymphalinae and Charaxinae. These butterfly–habitat associations in primary forest explain the opposite responses of the two groups of butterflies to selective logging. 4 Synthesis and applications. This study highlights the need to sample at a sufficiently large spatial scale to account for impacts of disturbance on heterogeneity in forest environments. It also demonstrates how understanding the responses of species to natural variation in environmental conditions within undisturbed forest is crucial to interpreting responses of species to anthropogenic habitat modification. The results further indicate that selectively logged forests can make an important contribution to the conservation of tropical biodiversity, provided that they are managed in a way that maintains environmental heterogeneity." @default.
- W2076465416 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W2076465416 creator A5010033316 @default.
- W2076465416 creator A5011851793 @default.
- W2076465416 creator A5042170359 @default.
- W2076465416 creator A5053681190 @default.
- W2076465416 creator A5072528328 @default.
- W2076465416 creator A5075413202 @default.
- W2076465416 creator A5080353941 @default.
- W2076465416 date "2003-02-01" @default.
- W2076465416 modified "2023-10-17" @default.
- W2076465416 title "Ecology of butterflies in natural and selectively logged forests of northern Borneo: the importance of habitat heterogeneity" @default.
- W2076465416 cites W1970602440 @default.
- W2076465416 cites W1974260884 @default.
- W2076465416 cites W1975773062 @default.
- W2076465416 cites W1979073388 @default.
- W2076465416 cites W1979601846 @default.
- W2076465416 cites W1984185175 @default.
- W2076465416 cites W1987200270 @default.
- W2076465416 cites W2001981982 @default.
- W2076465416 cites W2003120080 @default.
- W2076465416 cites W2003485756 @default.
- W2076465416 cites W2006098233 @default.
- W2076465416 cites W2007451826 @default.
- W2076465416 cites W2016358773 @default.
- W2076465416 cites W2021839660 @default.
- W2076465416 cites W2025729130 @default.
- W2076465416 cites W2025760702 @default.
- W2076465416 cites W2028597658 @default.
- W2076465416 cites W2037853184 @default.
- W2076465416 cites W2043184271 @default.
- W2076465416 cites W2052655283 @default.
- W2076465416 cites W2057384296 @default.
- W2076465416 cites W2063487789 @default.
- W2076465416 cites W2070575831 @default.
- W2076465416 cites W2074150345 @default.
- W2076465416 cites W2080834798 @default.
- W2076465416 cites W2084731057 @default.
- W2076465416 cites W2091395676 @default.
- W2076465416 cites W2103776730 @default.
- W2076465416 cites W2104767862 @default.
- W2076465416 cites W2106484350 @default.
- W2076465416 cites W2108057700 @default.
- W2076465416 cites W2122508680 @default.
- W2076465416 cites W2136025335 @default.
- W2076465416 cites W2136130652 @default.
- W2076465416 cites W2139667401 @default.
- W2076465416 cites W2143669664 @default.
- W2076465416 cites W2144547005 @default.
- W2076465416 cites W2145280582 @default.
- W2076465416 cites W2148777071 @default.
- W2076465416 cites W2151532290 @default.
- W2076465416 cites W2151786356 @default.
- W2076465416 cites W2166722801 @default.
- W2076465416 cites W2166886852 @default.
- W2076465416 cites W2171656301 @default.
- W2076465416 cites W2180315197 @default.
- W2076465416 cites W2323832062 @default.
- W2076465416 cites W2325006764 @default.
- W2076465416 cites W2495082846 @default.
- W2076465416 cites W2502354381 @default.
- W2076465416 cites W4302177819 @default.
- W2076465416 doi "https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2664.2003.00783.x" @default.
- W2076465416 hasPublicationYear "2003" @default.
- W2076465416 type Work @default.
- W2076465416 sameAs 2076465416 @default.
- W2076465416 citedByCount "202" @default.
- W2076465416 countsByYear W20764654162012 @default.
- W2076465416 countsByYear W20764654162013 @default.
- W2076465416 countsByYear W20764654162014 @default.
- W2076465416 countsByYear W20764654162015 @default.
- W2076465416 countsByYear W20764654162016 @default.
- W2076465416 countsByYear W20764654162017 @default.
- W2076465416 countsByYear W20764654162018 @default.
- W2076465416 countsByYear W20764654162019 @default.
- W2076465416 countsByYear W20764654162020 @default.
- W2076465416 countsByYear W20764654162021 @default.
- W2076465416 countsByYear W20764654162022 @default.
- W2076465416 countsByYear W20764654162023 @default.
- W2076465416 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2076465416 hasAuthorship W2076465416A5010033316 @default.
- W2076465416 hasAuthorship W2076465416A5011851793 @default.
- W2076465416 hasAuthorship W2076465416A5042170359 @default.
- W2076465416 hasAuthorship W2076465416A5053681190 @default.
- W2076465416 hasAuthorship W2076465416A5072528328 @default.
- W2076465416 hasAuthorship W2076465416A5075413202 @default.
- W2076465416 hasAuthorship W2076465416A5080353941 @default.
- W2076465416 hasBestOaLocation W20764654161 @default.
- W2076465416 hasConcept C121560416 @default.
- W2076465416 hasConcept C125620115 @default.
- W2076465416 hasConcept C130217890 @default.
- W2076465416 hasConcept C133382796 @default.
- W2076465416 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
- W2076465416 hasConcept C151730666 @default.
- W2076465416 hasConcept C166957645 @default.
- W2076465416 hasConcept C180395843 @default.
- W2076465416 hasConcept C185933670 @default.
- W2076465416 hasConcept C18903297 @default.