FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2076473123> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2076473123 endingPage "452" @default.
• W2076473123 startingPage "423" @default.
• W2076473123 abstract "The Fall of Robespierre and the Sublime Machine of Agency William Jewett Debates about historical agency—about the power or the obligation of individuals and collectives to act in making their own history—have recently been turning away from the sterile metaphysics of free subjects and conditioning structures, toward more pragmatic questions about how we understand things to get done. Theorists addressing such questions now seem less interested in identifying themselves as humanists or as antihumanists than in uncovering the interests that motivate people to try on those labels. 1 Questions about the grounds of agency, seen as unanswerable, have given way to questions about the beliefs we hold about acting: beliefs that are built into our everyday assumptions about rational behavior, and that are replicated in ordinary language. To ponder the rhetorical construction of agency is no longer to endorse Nietzsche’s dismissal of the human agent as “merely a fiction added to the deed”; to argue for the social production of agency no longer entails subscribing to Althusser’s cartoon of subjects hailed into existence by ideology. Thinking about agency is being done less in the service of theoretical olemic, and more by nuanced historical inquiry into situations, events, and texts that display unfamiliar configurations of circumstances, actions, and beliefs about agency. This change of mood among critics at large has coincided—not accidentally, perhaps—with a renewal of interest among literary historians in romantic drama. Drama, of course, is the genre featuring complete actions with beginnings, middles, and ends, exhibited within an irreducibly social framework. Romanticism, however, is notoriously vexed both in its handling of action and in its social commitments. One might have expected that critics would confine themselves to the discovery of newly refined tools to use in the traditional bludgeoning of romantic playwrights; but this has not been the case. For romanticists have simultaneously begun to see how much contemporary criticism owes, in its understanding of the social production of agency, to the same romantic writers. Steven E. Cole, for instance, has uncovered in Coleridge an understanding of agency that fits remarkably well with recent pragmatist discussions. In Cole’s paraphrase of Coleridge, “personhood is itself constituted [End Page 423] by first, the capacity to recognize others as agents capable of having their behavior motivated by ends, and second, the belief that others are similarly capable of recognizing my own motivation by ends rather than means.” 2 Agency, in this understanding, is produced by a structure of reciprocal projection accepted as belief: it is irreducibly social, or, one might also say, irreducibly dramatic in its constitution and functioning. At the same time, however, it is indissociable from the tradition of the liberal individual, which might be said to have reached its apotheosis in the first years of the French Revolution. That these beliefs about agency came together, under specific historical pressures, to alter the making of history, was of such acute interest among romantic writers that it is no exaggeration to suggest we owe our fascination with historical agency to them. At the very least, I believe we should recognize our obligation to consult romantic drama as part of our efforts to rethink historical agency. As a case in point, I offer Coleridge and Southey’s neglected 1794 historical drama The Fall of Robespierre. This text opens a wide range of questions about historical agency, and it does so, in the first instance, by virtue of its ambivalent stance on problems relating to the concept of individuality. On the one hand, it can be read as a kind of apotropaic defense of the individual, warning against the root causes of a political scene it depicts as devoted to the tragic annihilation of individuals. As such, it would belong to the same discursive universe as Burke’s Letters on a Regicide Peace, with its denunciation of French totalitarianism: “To them the will, the wish, the want, the liberty, the toil, the blood of individuals is as nothing. Individuality is left out of their scheme of government. The state is all in all.” 3 On the other hand, however, as a collaborative play about conspiracy, it must also be seen as instancing a critical rejection of..." @default.
• W2076473123 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2076473123 creator A5019790386 @default.
• W2076473123 date "1996-01-01" @default.
• W2076473123 modified "2023-10-17" @default.
• W2076473123 title "The Fall of Robespierre and the Sublime Machine of Agency" @default.
• W2076473123 cites W1488884374 @default.
• W2076473123 cites W1524562639 @default.
• W2076473123 cites W1526836172 @default.
• W2076473123 cites W1534568544 @default.
• W2076473123 cites W1537866182 @default.
• W2076473123 cites W1556569256 @default.
• W2076473123 cites W1598305713 @default.
• W2076473123 cites W1977639890 @default.
• W2076473123 cites W1977800926 @default.
• W2076473123 cites W2002289861 @default.
• W2076473123 cites W2008796221 @default.
• W2076473123 cites W2011304623 @default.
• W2076473123 cites W2015756904 @default.
• W2076473123 cites W2025860549 @default.
• W2076473123 cites W2028235351 @default.
• W2076473123 cites W2056879345 @default.
• W2076473123 cites W2071592352 @default.
• W2076473123 cites W2082725191 @default.
• W2076473123 cites W2085746678 @default.
• W2076473123 cites W2088482083 @default.
• W2076473123 cites W2116198121 @default.
• W2076473123 cites W2151902793 @default.
• W2076473123 cites W2317003051 @default.
• W2076473123 cites W2325231906 @default.
• W2076473123 cites W2797678451 @default.
• W2076473123 cites W2801684840 @default.
• W2076473123 cites W2802234536 @default.
• W2076473123 cites W397761312 @default.
• W2076473123 cites W411284841 @default.
• W2076473123 cites W2000329012 @default.
• W2076473123 cites W2329287902 @default.
• W2076473123 cites W583652145 @default.
• W2076473123 doi "https://doi.org/10.1353/elh.1996.0017" @default.
• W2076473123 hasPublicationYear "1996" @default.
• W2076473123 type Work @default.
• W2076473123 sameAs 2076473123 @default.
• W2076473123 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2076473123 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2076473123 hasAuthorship W2076473123A5019790386 @default.
• W2076473123 hasConcept C107038049 @default.
• W2076473123 hasConcept C108170787 @default.
• W2076473123 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
• W2076473123 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W2076473123 hasConcept C124952713 @default.
• W2076473123 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W2076473123 hasConcept C142362112 @default.
• W2076473123 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W2076473123 hasConcept C158071213 @default.
• W2076473123 hasConcept C163258240 @default.
• W2076473123 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2076473123 hasConcept C192562157 @default.
• W2076473123 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2076473123 hasConcept C2776717531 @default.
• W2076473123 hasConcept C523419034 @default.
• W2076473123 hasConcept C543847140 @default.
• W2076473123 hasConcept C62520636 @default.
• W2076473123 hasConcept C94625758 @default.
• W2076473123 hasConceptScore W2076473123C107038049 @default.
• W2076473123 hasConceptScore W2076473123C108170787 @default.
• W2076473123 hasConceptScore W2076473123C111472728 @default.
• W2076473123 hasConceptScore W2076473123C121332964 @default.
• W2076473123 hasConceptScore W2076473123C124952713 @default.
• W2076473123 hasConceptScore W2076473123C138885662 @default.
• W2076473123 hasConceptScore W2076473123C142362112 @default.
• W2076473123 hasConceptScore W2076473123C144024400 @default.
• W2076473123 hasConceptScore W2076473123C158071213 @default.
• W2076473123 hasConceptScore W2076473123C163258240 @default.
• W2076473123 hasConceptScore W2076473123C17744445 @default.
• W2076473123 hasConceptScore W2076473123C192562157 @default.
• W2076473123 hasConceptScore W2076473123C199539241 @default.
• W2076473123 hasConceptScore W2076473123C2776717531 @default.
• W2076473123 hasConceptScore W2076473123C523419034 @default.
• W2076473123 hasConceptScore W2076473123C543847140 @default.
• W2076473123 hasConceptScore W2076473123C62520636 @default.
• W2076473123 hasConceptScore W2076473123C94625758 @default.
• W2076473123 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W2076473123 hasLocation W20764731231 @default.
• W2076473123 hasOpenAccess W2076473123 @default.
• W2076473123 hasPrimaryLocation W20764731231 @default.
• W2076473123 hasRelatedWork W1042974768 @default.
• W2076473123 hasRelatedWork W1703894171 @default.
• W2076473123 hasRelatedWork W2140106396 @default.
• W2076473123 hasRelatedWork W2151184793 @default.
• W2076473123 hasRelatedWork W2362656186 @default.
• W2076473123 hasRelatedWork W2391307054 @default.
• W2076473123 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
• W2076473123 hasRelatedWork W2944854833 @default.
• W2076473123 hasRelatedWork W3048266942 @default.
• W2076473123 hasRelatedWork W65178584 @default.
• W2076473123 hasVolume "63" @default.
• W2076473123 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2076473123 isRetracted "false" @default.

• next