Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2076804725> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 63 of
63
with 100 items per page.
- W2076804725 endingPage "696" @default.
- W2076804725 startingPage "685" @default.
- W2076804725 abstract "We welcome the animated debate raised by Analytic Narratives concerning social scientific methods and the scope of rational choice. Advocates of mathematical and rational models have long claimed they have much to tell us about situations where behavior can be quantified or where the situation under study recurs many times. However, it was thought impermissible for rational choice theories (and rational choice) to venture into the analysis of big events. Political scientists like Gary King, Robert Keohane, and Sidney Verba (1994) implicitly conceded the issue by concentrating on the problem of case selection when the number of cases is small but greater than one. We believe unique events are too important to leave aside, and we use rational choice, particularly game theory, as a means to study unique events. A symposium on AN is a difficult exercise. The writing of analytic narratives is still in its infancy, and the topics and aims of the volume range across disciplines and over more than a millennium. The commentaries by Daniel Carpenter, Sunita Parikh, and Theda Skocpol reflect a patience and openness that we can only applaud. Overall they agree on the merits of the enterprise but debate the nature, relevance, and extensiveness of our contribution. The question that we must therefore confront is not whether to craft analytic narratives but what constitute the standards for research in this vein. Our critics perceptively indict us for a number of misdemeanors and perhaps even a few felonies. To most of Carpenter’s, Parikh’s, and Skocpol’s charges we plead guilty with honor. Rather than responding to each of their criticisms individually we recognize that they fundamentally concern four issues: (1) Does AN actually deliver what the introduction promises? (2) Where is the narrative? (3) Where is the analytical method? (4) How do we transform an approach to problems into a research area in social science?" @default.
- W2076804725 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W2076804725 creator A5006515995 @default.
- W2076804725 creator A5018742841 @default.
- W2076804725 creator A5033941912 @default.
- W2076804725 creator A5065106026 @default.
- W2076804725 creator A5090224756 @default.
- W2076804725 date "2000-12-01" @default.
- W2076804725 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
- W2076804725 title "Analytic Narratives Revisited" @default.
- W2076804725 cites W1978116453 @default.
- W2076804725 cites W2094736317 @default.
- W2076804725 cites W3152149978 @default.
- W2076804725 cites W379602626 @default.
- W2076804725 doi "https://doi.org/10.1215/01455532-24-4-685" @default.
- W2076804725 hasPublicationYear "2000" @default.
- W2076804725 type Work @default.
- W2076804725 sameAs 2076804725 @default.
- W2076804725 citedByCount "24" @default.
- W2076804725 countsByYear W20768047252012 @default.
- W2076804725 countsByYear W20768047252013 @default.
- W2076804725 countsByYear W20768047252014 @default.
- W2076804725 countsByYear W20768047252015 @default.
- W2076804725 countsByYear W20768047252016 @default.
- W2076804725 countsByYear W20768047252019 @default.
- W2076804725 countsByYear W20768047252021 @default.
- W2076804725 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2076804725 hasAuthorship W2076804725A5006515995 @default.
- W2076804725 hasAuthorship W2076804725A5018742841 @default.
- W2076804725 hasAuthorship W2076804725A5033941912 @default.
- W2076804725 hasAuthorship W2076804725A5065106026 @default.
- W2076804725 hasAuthorship W2076804725A5090224756 @default.
- W2076804725 hasBestOaLocation W20768047252 @default.
- W2076804725 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
- W2076804725 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
- W2076804725 hasConcept C199033989 @default.
- W2076804725 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
- W2076804725 hasConceptScore W2076804725C138885662 @default.
- W2076804725 hasConceptScore W2076804725C144024400 @default.
- W2076804725 hasConceptScore W2076804725C199033989 @default.
- W2076804725 hasConceptScore W2076804725C41895202 @default.
- W2076804725 hasIssue "4" @default.
- W2076804725 hasLocation W20768047251 @default.
- W2076804725 hasLocation W20768047252 @default.
- W2076804725 hasOpenAccess W2076804725 @default.
- W2076804725 hasPrimaryLocation W20768047251 @default.
- W2076804725 hasRelatedWork W1510197202 @default.
- W2076804725 hasRelatedWork W1966572006 @default.
- W2076804725 hasRelatedWork W2018944067 @default.
- W2076804725 hasRelatedWork W2044491910 @default.
- W2076804725 hasRelatedWork W2139511556 @default.
- W2076804725 hasRelatedWork W2163015735 @default.
- W2076804725 hasRelatedWork W2587403755 @default.
- W2076804725 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
- W2076804725 hasRelatedWork W3157356919 @default.
- W2076804725 hasRelatedWork W4206424409 @default.
- W2076804725 hasVolume "24" @default.
- W2076804725 isParatext "false" @default.
- W2076804725 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W2076804725 magId "2076804725" @default.
- W2076804725 workType "article" @default.